The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An empirical energy function for threading protein sequence through the folding motif
Abstract
In this paper we present a new residue contact potantial derived by statistical analysis of protein crystal structures. This gives mean hydrophobic and pairwise contact energies as a function of residue type and distance interval. To test the accuracy of this potential we generate model structures by “threading” different sequences through backbone folding motifs found in the structural data base. We find that conformational energies calculated by summing contact potentials show perfect specificity in matching the correct sequences with each globular folding motif in a 161‐protcin data set. They also identify correct models with the core folding motifs of heme‐rythrin and immunoglobulin McPC603 V 1‐do‐ main, among millions of alternatives possible when we align subsequences with α‐helices and β‐strands, and allow for variation in the lengths of intervening loops. We suggest that contact potentials reflect important constraints on nonbonded interaction in native proteins, and that “threading” may be useful for structure prediction by recognition of folding motif. © 1993 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The relation between the divergence of sequence and structure in proteins.
Chothia, C., & Lesk, A. M. (1986) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1002/j.1460-2075.1986.tb04288.x · Cited by 2,458
A new approach to protein fold recognition
Jones, D. T., Taylort, W. R., & Thornton, J. M. (1992) · Nature · doi:10.1038/358086a0 · Cited by 1,221
Topology fingerprint approach to the inverse protein folding problem
Godzik, A., Kolinski, A., & Skolnick, J. (1992) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/0022-2836(92)90693-e · Cited by 339
Cited by
Statistical potential for assessment and prediction of protein structures
Shen, M., & Sali, A. (2006) · Protein Science · doi:10.1110/ps.062416606 · Cited by 2,307
Zhou, H., & Zhou, Y. (2002) · Protein Science · doi:10.1110/ps.0217002 · Cited by 902
GenTHREADER: an efficient and reliable protein fold recognition method for genomic sequences
Jones, D. T. (1999) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.1999.2583 · Cited by 895
Perspective: Coarse-grained models for biomolecular systems
Noid, W. G. (2013) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.4818908 · Cited by 893
Conservation and prediction of solvent accessibility in protein families
Rost, B., & Sander, C. (1994) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.340200303 · Cited by 665
Metadata
- Authors
- Bryant, S. H., & Lawrence, C. E.
- Venue
- Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1993-05
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 92-112
- ISSN
- 0887-3585 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0134
- OpenAlex
- W2136739161
- Cited by
- 400
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 12.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An empirical energy function for threading protein sequence through the folding motif. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/prot.340160110
- The paper
- Bryant, S. H., & Lawrence, C. E. (1993). An empirical energy function for threading protein sequence through the folding motif. Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics. https://doi.org/10.1002/prot.340160110
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.