The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evaluation of SmartStax and SmartStax PRO maize against western corn rootworm and northern corn rootworm: efficacy and resistance management
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cases of western corn rootworm (WCR) field‐evolved resistance to Cry3Bb1 and other corn rootworm (CRW) control traits have been reported. Pyramid products expressing multiple CRW traits can delay resistance compared to single trait products. We used field studies to assess the pyramid CRW corn products, SmartStax (expressing Cry3Bb1 and Cry34Ab1/Cry35Ab1) and SmartStax PRO (expressing Cry3Bb1, Cry34Ab1/Cry35Ab1 and DvSnf7), at locations with high WCR densities and possible Cry3Bb1 resistance, and to assess the reduction in adult emergence attributable to DvSnf7 and other traits. Insect resistance models were used to assess durability of SmartStax and SmartStax PRO to WCR resistance. RESULTS: SmartStax significantly reduced root injury compared to non‐CRW‐trait controls at all but one location with measurable WCR pressure, while SmartStax PRO significantly reduced root injury at all locations, despite evidence of Cry3Bb1 resistance at some locations. The advantage of SmartStax PRO over SmartStax in reducing root damage was positively correlated with root damage on non‐CRW‐trait controls. DvSnf7 was estimated to reduce WCR emergence by approximately 80–95%, which modeling indicated will improve durability of Cry3Bb1 and Cry34Ab1/Cry35Ab1 compared to SmartStax. CONCLUSION: The addition of DvSnf7 in SmartStax PRO can reduce root damage under high WCR densities and prolong Cry3Bb1 and Cry34Ab1/Cry35Ab1 durability. © 2017 Society of Chemical Industry
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
R Core Team (2025) · doi:10.32614/r.manuals · Cited by 352,181
Sustainability of Transgenic Insecticidal Cultivars: Integrating Pest Genetics and Ecology
Gould, F. (1998) · Annual Review of Entomology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ento.43.1.701 · Cited by 1,392
A stagewise rejective multiple test procedure based on a modified Bonferroni test
HOMMEL, G. (1988) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/75.2.383 · Cited by 1,367
Field-Evolved Resistance to Bt Maize by Western Corn Rootworm
Gassmann, A. J., Petzold-Maxwell, J. L., Keweshan, R. S., & Dunbar, M. W. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0022629 · Cited by 666
Bolognesi, R., Ramaseshadri, P., Anderson, J., Bachman, P., Clinton, W., Flannagan, R., Ilagan, O., Lawrence, C., Levine, S., Moar, W., et al. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0047534 · Cited by 473
Roush, R. T. (1998) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.1998.0330 · Cited by 444
Methods for the Study of Pest Diabrotica
(1986) · Springer Series in Experimental Entomology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-4868-2 · Cited by 349
Gassmann, A. J., Petzold-Maxwell, J. L., Clifton, E. H., Dunbar, M. W., Hoffmann, A. M., Ingber, D. A., & Keweshan, R. S. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1317179111 · Cited by 340
Vaughn, T., Cavato, T., Brar, G., Coombe, T., DeGooyer, T., Ford, S., Groth, M., Howe, A., Johnson, S., Kolacz, K., et al. (2005) · Crop Science · doi:10.2135/cropsci2004.0304 · Cited by 242
Can Pyramids and Seed Mixtures Delay Resistance to Bt Crops?
Carrière, Y., Fabrick, J. A., & Tabashnik, B. E. (2016) · Trends in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2015.12.011 · Cited by 237
Cited by
An Overview of Some Biopesticides and Their Importance in Plant Protection for Commercial Acceptance
Kumar, J., Ramlal, A., Mallick, D., & Mishra, V. (2021) · Plants · doi:10.3390/plants10061185 · Cited by 474
Khajuria, C., Ivashuta, S., Wiggins, E., Flagel, L., Moar, W., Pleau, M., Miller, K., Zhang, Y., Ramaseshadri, P., Jiang, C., et al. (2018) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0197059 · Cited by 251
Self-citationGenetically engineered crops help support conservation biological control
Romeis, J., Naranjo, S. E., Meissle, M., & Shelton, A. M. (2019) · Biological Control · doi:10.1016/j.biocontrol.2018.10.001 · Cited by 231
Crop rotation mitigates impacts of corn rootworm resistance to transgenic Bt corn
Carrière, Y., Brown, Z., Aglasan, S., Dutilleul, P., Carroll, M., Head, G., Tabashnik, B. E., Jørgensen, P. S., & Carroll, S. P. (2020) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2003604117 · Cited by 58
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Head, G. P., Carroll, M. W., Evans, S. P., Rule, D. M., Willse, A. R., Clark, T. L., Storer, N. P., Flannagan, R. D., Samuel, L. W., & Meinke, L. J.
- Venue
- Pest Management Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017-03-17
- Volume
- 73
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1883-1899
- ISSN
- 1526-498X (ISSN-L)
- 1526-4998
- OpenAlex
- W2588634698
- Cited by
- 284
- References
- 24
- FWCI
- 6.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evaluation of SmartStax and SmartStax PRO maize against western corn rootworm and northern corn rootworm: efficacy and resistance management. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ps.4554
- The paper
- Head, G. P., Carroll, M. W., Evans, S. P., Rule, D. M., Willse, A. R., Clark, T. L., Storer, N. P., Flannagan, R. D., Samuel, L. W., & Meinke, L. J. (2017). Evaluation of SmartStax and SmartStax PRO maize against western corn rootworm and northern corn rootworm: efficacy and resistance management. Pest Management Science. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.4554
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
