Cited by 41Skin Protection and AgingGinkgo biloba and Cashew Applicationsmelanin and skin pigmentation

Photoprotective Effects of Topical Formulations Containing a Combination of Ginkgo biloba and Green Tea Extracts

Belo, Susi Elaine Dal, Gaspar, Lorena Rigo, Campos, Patrícia Maria Berardo Gonçalves Maia·2011·Phytotherapy Research

Abstract

The beneficial photoprotective effects of topical formulations containing combined extracts of Ginkgo biloba (GB) and green tea (GT) have not been investigated. The present study aims to assess the photoprotective effects of topical formulations containing GB and GT combined or not by applications on the dorsal skin of hairless mice prior to UVA/B irradiation. After 20 h, skin barrier damage (TEWL), erythema, histological alterations and sunburn cell formation were evaluated. The results showed that only extract supplemented formulations protected the skin against the UV‐induced damage. Formulations containing GB provided total protection of the skin barrier function avoiding UV radiation damage such as TEWL and erythema and were more effective than those containing GT. However, it is suggested that formulations containing combined GB and GT may provide substantial photoprotective effects since different aspects of skin damage were influenced by each extract. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ptr.3507

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Belo et al. in vitro study on Ginkgo biloba and green tea extracts was classified as Level 3 evidence and was limited by in vitro design, small sample size, and lack of a control group.

    “According to the Oxford Centre for Evidence‐Based Medicine Levels of Evidence, this study would be classified as Level 3: evidence from well‐designed controlled trials without randomization.”

    From Cosmeceuticals in photoaging: A review. (2024) · cites this paper as [11]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 33 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Belo, S. E. D., Gaspar, L. R., & Campos, P. M. B. G. M.
Affiliations
Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
Corresponding author
Campos, Patrícia Maria Berardo Gonçalves Maia
Venue
Phytotherapy Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-04-25
Volume
25
Issue
12
Pages
1854-1860
ISSN
  • 0951-418X (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-1573
OpenAlex
W1561803985
Cited by
41
References
33
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Phytotherapy Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo
  • Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Skin Protection and Aging
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Ginkgo biloba and Cashew Applications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › melanin and skin pigmentation
Keywords
photoprotection, Ginkgo biloba extract, green tea extract, topical formulation, skin barrier function, transepidermal water loss, erythema, sunburn cells, skin histopathology, hairless mice
MeSH terms
Administration, Cutaneous, Animals, Erythema, Male, Mice, Hairless, Plant Extracts, Skin, Sunburn, Sunscreening Agents, Tea, Ultraviolet Rays, Ginkgo biloba, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review