Cited by 1,831Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty EvaluationAnalytical chemistry methods developmentChemistry and Stereochemistry Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 38 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

Guidelines and recommended terms for expression of stable-isotope-ratio and gas-ratio measurement results

Open access
Coplen, Tyler B.·2011·Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry

Abstract

To minimize confusion in the expression of measurement results of stable isotope and gas-ratio measurements, recommendations based on publications of the Commission on Isotopic Abundances and Atomic Weights of the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC) are presented. Whenever feasible, entries are consistent with the Système International d'Unités, the SI (known in English as the International System of Units), and the third edition of the International Vocabulary of Basic and General Terms in Metrology (VIM, 3rd edition). The recommendations presented herein are approved by the Commission on Isotopic Abundances and Atomic Weights and are designed to clarify expression of quantities related to measurement of isotope and gas ratios to ensure that quantity equations instead of numerical value equations are used for quantity definitions. Examples of column headings consistent with quantity calculus (also called the algebra of quantities) and examples of various deprecated usages connected with the terms recommended are presented.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/rcm.5129

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

0 of 38 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

Show all 6 claims

  • Probably not a substantial claim. 67
  • It may state two separate claims as one. 22
70 of 70
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    There is confusion about the notation of delta values in isotope studies.

    “During the 2003 meeting in Ottawa, Canada, of the Commission on Isotopic Abundances and Atomic Weights of the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry, members recognized that there is confusion about the notation of delta values in isotope studies.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Most chemical elements have more than one stable isotope.

    “Most chemical elements have more than one stable isotope.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    An isotope effect is related to, and may be predicted from, molecular structures of reactants, transition states, and products of an elementary chemical reaction, and it is position- and reaction-specific.

    “An isotope effect is related to, and may be predicted from, molecular structures of reactants, transition states, and products of an elementary chemical reaction.It is position-and reaction-specific (i.e., for the same reaction, each molecular position has a different isotope effect, and the same position shows different isotope effects in different reactions).”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    All elements of even atomic number greater than that of oxygen have three or more stable isotopes and have the potential to exhibit non-mass-dependent isotopic fractionation.

    “All elements of even atomic number greater than that of oxygen have three or more stable isotopes and have the potential to exhibit non-mass-dependent isotopic fractionation.”
4 of 4

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 42 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. BIPM.The International System of Units (SI) 8th edition brochure (in English);2006. Available:http://www.bipm.org/.
  2. IUPAC.Compendium of Chemical Terminology 2nd ed. (the ‘Gold Book’). Compiled by A. D. McNaught A. Wilkinson.Blackwell Scientific Publications Oxford 1997. XML on‐line corrected version:http://goldbook.iupac.org(2006) created by M. Nic J. Jirat B. Kosata. Updates compiled by A. Jenkins.
  3. Friedman I., 1977, U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 440–KK, Data of Geochemistry
  4. Hayes J. M., 1983, Organic Geochemistry of Contemporaneous and Ancient Sediments, 5.1

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–400 of 1,821

Metadata

Authors
Coplen, T. B.
Affiliations
United States Geological Survey (US)
Corresponding author
Coplen, Tyler B.
Venue
Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-08-19
Volume
25
Issue
17
Pages
2538-2560
ISSN
  • 0951-4198 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0231
OpenAlex
W2123004271
Cited by
1,831
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 118 · 2025: 114 · 2024: 106 · 2023: 141 · 2022: 129 · 2021: 173 · 2020: 166 · 2019: 159 · 2018: 142 · 2017: 128 · 2016: 119 · 2015: 106 · 2014: 83 · 2013: 72 · 2012: 67
FWCI
77.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Geological Survey
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Instrumentation › Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Analytical chemistry methods development
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Chemistry and Stereochemistry Studies
Keywords
stable isotope ratios, gas mixture ratio, isotope ratio measurement, terminology, SI units, VIM, IUPAC recommendations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-10, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-10 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review