Cited by 140

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Site‐specific deamidation of glutamine: a new marker of bone collagen deterioration

van Doorn, Nienke L., Wilson, Julie, Hollund, Hege, Soressi, Marie, Collins, Matthew J.·2012·Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry

Abstract

RATIONALE: Non‐enzymatic deamidation accumulates in aging tissues in vivo and has been proposed to be potentially useful as a molecular clock. The process continues post mortem, and here we explore the increase in levels of deamidation in archaeological collagen, as measured during Zooarchaeology by Mass Spectrometry (ZooMS) analysis. METHODS: With the high sensitivity of current generation mass spectrometers, ZooMS provides a non‐destructive and highly cost‐effective method to characterise collagen peptides. Deamidation can be detected by mass spectrometry as a +0.984 Da mass shift; therefore, aside from its original purpose, peptide mass‐fingerprinting for bone identification, ZooMS concurrently yields a 'thermal indicator' of the samples. RESULTS: By analysis of conventional ZooMS spectra, we determined the deamidation rate for glutamine residues in 911 bone collagen samples from 50 sites, with ages varying from medieval to Palaeolithic. The degree of deamidation was compared to diagenetic parameters and nearby sequence properties. CONCLUSIONS: The extent of deamidation was found to be influenced more by burial conditions and thermal age than, for example, chronological age, the extent of bioerosion or crystallinity. The method lends itself mostly to screening heterogenic deposits of bone to identify outliers. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/rcm.6351

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Ramsøe et al. developed a novel software tool (deamiDATE) to measure site-specific deamidation rates, based on previous work by van Doorn et al. exploring site-specific deamidation.

    “On the basis of the previous work by van Doorn et al. (84) exploring deamidation rates based on the presence of other amino acids adjacent to glutamine (site-specific deamidation), Ramsøe et al. (83) developed a novel software tool (deamiDATE) to measure these site-specific deamidation rates.”

    From Ancient protein analysis in archaeology (2021) · cites this paper as [84]

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 46

  1. 10.1021/pr070182x · DOI
  2. 10.1073/pnas.221463198 · DOI
  3. Robinson N. E., 2004, Molecular Clocks: Deamidation of Asparaginyl and Glutaminyl Residues in Peptides and Proteins
  4. 10.1006/exer.2001.0983 · DOI
  5. 10.1002/rcm.5237 · DOI
  6. 10.1167/iovs.09-4308 · DOI
  7. 10.1021/ac1027275 · DOI
  8. 10.1110/ps.8.11.2519 · DOI
  9. 10.1073/pnas.66.3.753 · DOI
  10. 10.1073/pnas.071066498 · DOI
  11. 10.1021/js9802493 · DOI
  12. 10.1126/science.3353715 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1002/jps.1165 · DOI
  14. 10.1074/mcp.O111.009381 · DOI
  15. 10.1111/j.1399-3011.2004.00151.x · DOI
  16. 10.1098/rstb.1999.0359 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/S0146-6380(98)00098-9 · DOI
  18. 10.1021/ac202980z · DOI
  19. 10.1073/pnas.98.3.944 · DOI
  20. 10.1016/S0006-3495(99)77476-X · DOI
  21. 10.4081/antiqua.2011.e1 · DOI
  22. 10.1002/rcm.4316 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1016/j.jas.2011.02.014 · DOI
  24. 10.1007/s12520-011-0067-y · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1021/ac301333t · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1021/pr801054w · DOI
  27. Zhu Q., 2011, A Bayesian model averaging approach to the quantification of overlapping peptides in an MALDI‐TOF mass spectrum.pdf, International Journal of Proteomics, 928391
  28. 10.1016/j.palaeo.2008.03.038 · DOI
  29. 10.1016/j.jas.2008.11.013 · DOI
  30. 10.1111/j.1475‐4754.2012.00695.x · DOI
  31. 10.1006/jasc.1996.0087 · DOI
  32. 10.1016/S0040-6031(00)00620-1 · DOI
  33. 10.1016/S0047-2484(03)00106-4 · DOI
  34. 10.1021/jf050944d · DOI
  35. 10.1007/s12520-009-0002-7 · DOI · Paper page
  36. 10.1007/s12520-009-0004-5 · DOI
  37. 10.1016/0305-4403(90)90058-D · DOI
  38. 10.1006/jasc.1999.0537 · DOI
  39. 10.1021/ac061017o · DOI
  40. 10.1007/s00114-008-0478-5 · DOI
  41. 10.1002/oa.1273 · DOI
  42. 10.1016/j.jas.2007.08.012 · DOI
  43. Schmölcke U., 2001, Wangels MN V – erste Auswertung der Tierknochenfunde von einem ungewöhnlichen Fundplatz der Trichterbecherkultur in Ostholstein, Beiträge zur Archäozoologie und Prähistorischen Anthropologie, 44
  44. Tarrús J., 2008, La Draga (Banyoles, Catalonia), an Early Neolithic lakeside village in Mediterranean Europe, Catalan Historical Rev., 1, 17
  45. 10.1016/j.jas.2011.09.019 · DOI
  46. 10.1016/j.jas.2011.04.012 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
van Doorn, N. L., Wilson, J., Hollund, H., Soressi, M., & Collins, M. J.
Affiliations
  • BioArCh, Biology (S‐Block) University of York York YO10 5YW UK
  • Department of Mathematics University of York York YO10 5YW UK
  • Department of Geoarchaeology Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam De Boelelaan 1085 1081 HV Amsterdam The Netherlands
  • Inrap 525 Avenue de la Pomme dePin 45590 Saint‐Cyr‐en‐Val France
Venue
Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-08-28
Volume
26
Issue
19
Pages
2319-2327
ISSN
  • 0951-4198
  • 1097-0231
Cited by
140
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review