The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Investigation of matrix effects in bioanalytical high‐performance liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometric assays: application to drug discovery
Abstract
A series of studies was performed to investigate some of the causes for matrix effects (‘ion suppression’ or ‘ion enhancement’) in bioanalytical high‐performance liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC/MS/MS) assays. Previous studies have reported that matrix effects are mainly due to endogenous components in biological fluids and are a greater concern for electrospray ionization (ESI) than for atmospheric pressure chemical ionization (APCI). In this report we demonstrate that: (1) matrix effects can also be caused by exogenous materials, such as polymers contained in different brands of plastic tubes, or Li‐heparin, a commonly used anticoagulant; (2) matrix effects are not only ionization mode (APCI or ESI) dependent, but also source design (Sciex, Finnigan, Micromass) dependent; and (3) for at least one vendor's design, we found the APCI mode to be more sensitive to matrix effects than the ESI mode. Based on these findings, we have proposed the following simple strategies to avoid matrix effects: (1) select the same brand of plastic tubes for processing and storing plasma samples and spiked plasma standards; (2) avoid using Li‐heparin as the anticoagulant; and (3) try switching the ionization mode or switching to different mass spectrometers when matrix effects are encountered. These three strategies have allowed us to use protein precipitation and generic fast LC techniques to generate reliable LC/MS/MS data for the support of pharmacokinetic studies at the early drug discovery stage. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Ferrer, C., Lozano, A., Agüera, A., Girón, A. J., & Fernández-Alba, A. R. (2011) · Journal of Chromatography A · doi:10.1016/j.chroma.2011.07.033 · Cited by 485
Mallet, C. R., Lu, Z., & Mazzeo, J. R. (2004) · Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry · doi:10.1002/rcm.1276 · Cited by 441
Effects of pre-analytical processes on blood samples used in metabolomics studies
Yin, P., Lehmann, R., & Xu, G. (2015) · Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry · doi:10.1007/s00216-015-8565-x · Cited by 278
Challenges for measuring oxytocin: the blind men and the elephant?
MacLean, E. L., Wilson, S. R., Martin, W. L., Davis, J. M., Nazarloo, H. P., & Carter, C. S. (2019) · Psychoneuroendocrinology · doi:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2019.05.018 · Cited by 183
González‐Mariño, I., Quintana, J. B., Rodríguez, I., & Cela, R. (2009) · Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry · doi:10.1002/rcm.4069 · Cited by 160
Metadata
- Authors
- Mei, H., Hsieh, Y., Nardo, C., Xu, X., Wang, S., Ng, K., & Korfmacher, W. A.
- Venue
- Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-11-28
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 97-103
- ISSN
- 0951-4198 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0231
- OpenAlex
- W2133597621
- Cited by
- 350
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Investigation of matrix effects in bioanalytical high‐performance liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometric assays: application to drug discovery. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/rcm.876
- The paper
- Mei, H., Hsieh, Y., Nardo, C., Xu, X., Wang, S., Ng, K., & Korfmacher, W. A. (2003). Investigation of matrix effects in bioanalytical high‐performance liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometric assays: application to drug discovery. Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.876
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.