Cited by 183Neuroendocrine regulation and behaviorNeuropeptides and Animal PhysiologyStress Responses and Cortisol

Challenges for measuring oxytocin: the blind men and the elephant?

Open access
MacLean, Evan L., Wilson, Steven Ray, Martin, W. Lance, Davis, John M., Nazarloo, Hossein P., Carter, C. Sue·2019·Psychoneuroendocrinology

Abstract

Since its discovery more than a century ago, oxytocin has become one of the most intensively studied molecules in behavioral biology. In the last five years, Psychoneuroendocrinology has published more than 500 articles with oxytocin in the title, with many of these articles including measures of endogenous oxytocin concentrations. Despite longstanding interest, methods of measuring endogenous oxytocin are still in active development. The widely varying oxytocin concentrations detected by different approaches to measurement - and lack of correlation among these techniques - has led to controversy and confusion. We identify features of oxytocin that may help to explain why various approaches may be differentially sensitive to diverse conformational states of the oxytocin molecule. We propose that discrepancies in data generated by different methods of measurement are not necessarily an indicator that some methods are valid whereas others are not. Rather, we propose that current challenges in the measurement of oxytocin may be analogous to the parable of the blind men and the elephant, with different methods of sample preparation and measurement being sensitive to different states in which the oxytocin molecule can exist.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2019.05.018

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Discrepancies in music-induced OXT findings may arise from differences in participant characteristics, types of music-based intervention, study designs, OXT measurements, and contextual factors.

    “The discrepancies may arise from differences in participant characteristics, types of music-based intervention, study designs, OXT measurements, and contextual factors (Engel et al., 2019; MacLean et al., 2019; Tabak et al., 2023).”

    From Music's context-dependent influence on oxytocin, social bonding, and emotion regulation: a systematic review (2026) · cites this paper as MacLean et al., 2019

    The Implications section (page unavailable) explains that different oxytocin measurement methods can yield discrepant results because they detect different forms of the molecule. This supports OXT measurement as a possible source of discrepancies, but the paper does not address music-induced findings or attribute their differences to participant characteristics, music interventions, study designs, or contextual factors. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
MacLean, E. L., Wilson, S. R., Martin, W. L., Davis, J. M., Nazarloo, H. P., & Carter, C. S.
Affiliations
  • University of Arizona (US)
  • University of Oslo (NO)
  • University of Illinois Chicago (US)
  • Indiana University (US)
Corresponding author
MacLean, Evan L.
Venue
Psychoneuroendocrinology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-09
Volume
107
Pages
225-231
ISSN
0306-4530 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2945572346
Cited by
183
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 48 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 7
FWCI
3.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychoneuroendocrinology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • Norges Forskningsråd (262613)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
  • National Institutes of Health (R21HD095217, P01HD07575)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
Keywords
oxytocin, measurement method comparison, sample preparation, method sensitivity
MeSH terms
Animals, Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid, Humans, Immunoassay, Oxytocin, Specimen Handling, Vasopressins, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review