Cited by 46Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances researchGroundwater flow and contamination studiesEnvironmental and Analytical Chemistry Studies

Application of PFAS- mobile lab to support adaptive characterization and flux- based conceptual site models at AFFF releases

Quinnan, Joseph, Rossi, Michael, Curry, Patrick, Lupo, Mark, Miller, Margaret, Korb, Helmer, Orth, Cameron, Hasbrouck, Kristen·2021·Remediation Journal

Abstract

Abstract This article presents two aspects of an Environmental Security Technology Certification Program (ESTCP) demonstration conducted at Camp Grayling Army Airfield in Grayling, Michigan: verification of an accelerated per‐ and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) screening method using liquid chromatography and tandem mass spectroscopy and its application to develop a flux‐based conceptual model. The ESTCP project information can be found here: https://serdp‐estcp.org/Program‐Areas/Environmental‐Restoration/Contaminated‐Groundwater/Emerging‐Issues/ER19‐5203 . The objective is to demonstrate the value of adaptive high‐resolution PFAS site characterization using a quantitative screening method that is selective for PFAS compounds and sensitive across the range of concentrations between screening levels at 40 nanograms per liter and source impacts within the milligram per liter range. The reliability of the method is demonstrated using three metrics: sample pair comparability statistics with an Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program‐certified lab, visual interpretation of characterization and relative flux, and comparison of contaminant mass discharge calculated at flux transects. In addition, the study measured vadose zone source strength using three methods: soil to groundwater concentration ratios, lysimeter porewater sample analysis, and synthetic precipitation leaching procedure testing. The overall results demonstrate that application of the mobile lab and the stratigraphic flux approach can distinguish individual PFAS sources, visually map perfluorooctanoic acid and perfluorooctane sulfonate and migration pathways, and provide an efficient means of ranking source contributions to plumes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/rem.21680

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Quinnan, J., Rossi, M., Curry, P., Lupo, M., Miller, M., Korb, H., Orth, C., & Hasbrouck, K.
Affiliations
  • Arcadis Novi Michigan USA
  • NutritionQuest (United States) (US)
  • Arcadis Houston Texas USA
  • Arcadis (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Quinnan, Joseph
Venue
Remediation Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-03-16
Volume
31
Issue
3
Pages
7-26
ISSN
  • 1051-5658 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-6831
OpenAlex
W3138239425
Cited by
46
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 2
FWCI
2.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Remediation Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Groundwater flow and contamination studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Environmental and Analytical Chemistry Studies
Keywords
PFAS, aqueous film-forming foam, liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry, perfluorooctanoic acid, PFOS, synthetic precipitation leaching procedure, groundwater contamination

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review