Cited by 19Stroke Rehabilitation and RecoveryAcute Ischemic Stroke ManagementDysphagia Assessment and Management

Serious Adverse Events Experienced by Survivors of Stroke in the First Year Following Discharge from Inpatient Rehabilitation

Open access
Ostwald, Sharon K., Godwin, Kyler M., Ye, Fang, Cron, Stanley G.·2013·Rehabilitation Nursing

Abstract

PURPOSE: To identify the incidence of adverse events (AE) that occurred in stroke survivors during the first year following discharge from inpatient rehabilitation and to determine the type and patterns of AE. METHODS: Data were collected for 12 months on events resulting in admissions to the emergency department, hospital, long-term care facility, or death. Descriptive statistics were used to depict the patterns of AE and univariate comparisons were made of the differences between survivors who did or did not experience one or more AE. RESULTS: Of the 159 participants, 50% reported a total of 163 AE. Most AE (82.2%) were unexpected and the majority occurred during the first 6 months; 12 recurrent strokes and 6 transient ischemic attacks occcurred. CONCLUSIONS: Education on prevention and treatment of common AE is important prior to discharge. Anticipatory guidance may help survivors and caregivers modify their lifestyle and prevent common AE.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/rnj.87

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Hip/femur fracture and stroke were chosen because they account for many SNF admissions and carry high risk of adverse outcomes.

    “These conditions were selected as they constitute a high proportion of SNF admissions and are at high risk for adverse outcomes.36–38”

    From Discharge Communication of Dementia-Related Neuropsychiatric Symptoms and Care Management Strategies during Hospital to Skilled Nursing Facility Transitions (2021) · cites this paper as [38]

    The Results > Unexpected Adverse Events section (page unavailable) reports serious adverse events among stroke survivors after inpatient rehabilitation, supporting the adverse-outcome rationale for stroke. The paper does not establish that stroke or hip/femur fracture accounts for a high proportion of SNF admissions, or assess adverse-outcome risk among patients admitted for hip/femur fracture. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Chalermwannopong S Panuthai S Srisuphan W Panya P Ostwald SK 2010 Effects of the transitional care program on functional ability and quality of life of stroke survivors CMU Journal of Natural Science 9 1 49 66
  2. Lamb SE Ferrucci L Volapto S Fried LP Guralnik JM 2003 Risk factors for falling in home-dwelling older women with stroke: The women's health and aging study Stroke 34 494 501 12574566
  3. Russo CA Andrews RM 2008 Hospital stays for stroke and other cerebrovascular diseases, 2005 (Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) Statistical Briefs #51)Retrieved from Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality website: http://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/statbriefs/sb51.pdf 21735576

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ostwald, S. K., Godwin, K. M., Ye, F., & Cron, S. G.
Affiliations
The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (US)
Corresponding author
Ostwald, Sharon K.
Venue
Rehabilitation Nursing
Published
2013-09
Volume
38
Issue
5
Pages
254-263
ISSN
0278-4807 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2144283512
Cited by
19
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1
FWCI
2.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Rehabilitation Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Nursing Research (R01NR005316)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Dysphagia Assessment and Management
Keywords
stroke survivors, adverse events, post-discharge outcomes, inpatient rehabilitation, stroke recurrence, transient ischemic attack, emergency department visits, hospital readmission, long-term care admission, anticipatory guidance, patient education, secondary stroke prevention
MeSH terms
Stroke Rehabilitation, Aged, Ischemic Attack, Transient, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Discharge, Recurrence, Incidence, Survivors, Rehabilitation Nursing, Stroke

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review