The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
RANGE–Robust autonomous navigation in GPS‐denied environments
Open accessAbstract
This paper addresses the problem of autonomous navigation of a micro air vehicle (MAV) in GPS‐denied environments. We present experimental validation and analysis for our system that enables a quadrotor helicopter, equipped with a laser range finder sensor, to autonomously explore and map unstructured and unknown environments. The key challenge for enabling GPS‐denied flight of a MAV is that the system must be able to estimate its position and velocity by sensing unknown environmental structure with sufficient accuracy and low enough latency to stably control the vehicle. Our solution overcomes this challenge in the face of MAV payload limitations imposed on sensing, computational, and communication resources. We first analyze the requirements to achieve fully autonomous quadrotor helicopter flight in GPS‐denied areas, highlighting the differences between ground and air robots that make it difficult to use algorithms developed for ground robots. We report on experiments that validate our solutions to key challenges, namely a multilevel sensing and control hierarchy that incorporates a high‐speed laser scan‐matching algorithm, data fusion filter, high‐level simultaneous localization and mapping, and a goal‐directed exploration module. These experiments illustrate the quadrotor helicopter's ability to accurately and autonomously navigate in a number of large‐scale unknown environments, both indoors and in the urban canyon. The system was further validated in the field by our winning entry in the 2009 International Aerial Robotics Competition, which required the quadrotor to autonomously enter a hazardous unknown environment through a window, explore the indoor structure without GPS, and search for a visual target. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
MonoSLAM: Real-time single camera SLAM
Davison, A. J., Reid, I. D., Molton, N. D., & Stasse, O. (2007) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2007.1049 · Cited by 3,959
Globally Consistent Range Scan Alignment for Environment Mapping
Lu, F., & Milios, E. (1997) · Autonomous Robots · doi:10.1023/a:1008854305733 · Cited by 1,304
Cited by
Unmanned Aircraft Capture and Control Via GPS Spoofing
Kerns, A. J., Shepard, D. P., Bhatti, J. A., & Humphreys, T. E. (2014) · Journal of Field Robotics · doi:10.1002/rob.21513 · Cited by 688
A Review of GNSS-Independent UAV Navigation Techniques
Gyagenda, N., Hatilima, J. V., Roth, H., & Zhmud, V. (2022) · Robotics and Autonomous Systems · doi:10.1016/j.robot.2022.104069 · Cited by 190
Metadata
- Authors
- Bachrach, A., Prentice, S., He, R., & Roy, N.
- Venue
- Journal of Field Robotics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-08-09
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 644-666
- ISSN
- 1556-4959 (ISSN-L)
- 1556-4967
- OpenAlex
- W1982318371
- Cited by
- 285
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 46.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: RANGE–Robust autonomous navigation in GPS‐denied environments. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/rob.20400
- The paper
- Bachrach, A., Prentice, S., He, R., & Roy, N. (2011). RANGE–Robust autonomous navigation in GPS‐denied environments. Journal of Field Robotics. https://doi.org/10.1002/rob.20400
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.