Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 178

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

GPS‐denied Indoor and Outdoor Monocular Vision Aided Navigation and Control of Unmanned Aircraft

Chowdhary, Girish, Johnson, Eric N., Magree, Daniel, Wu, Allen, Shein, Andy·2013·Journal of Field Robotics

Abstract

GPS‐denied closed‐loop autonomous control of unstable Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) such as rotorcraft using information from a monocular camera has been an open problem. Most proposed Vision aided Inertial Navigation Systems (V‐INSs) have been too computationally intensive or do not have sufficient integrity for closed‐loop flight. We provide an affirmative answer to the question of whether V‐INSs can be used to sustain prolonged real‐world GPS‐denied flight by presenting a V‐INS that is validated through autonomous flight‐tests over prolonged closed‐loop dynamic operation in both indoor and outdoor GPS‐denied environments with two rotorcraft unmanned aircraft systems (UASs). The architecture efficiently combines visual feature information from a monocular camera with measurements from inertial sensors. Inertial measurements are used to predict frame‐to‐frame transition of online selected feature locations, and the difference between predicted and observed feature locations is used to bind in real‐time the inertial measurement unit drift, estimate its bias, and account for initial misalignment errors. A novel algorithm to manage a library of features online is presented that can add or remove features based on a measure of relative confidence in each feature location. The resulting V‐INS is sufficiently efficient and reliable to enable real‐time implementation on resource‐constrained aerial vehicles. The presented algorithms are validated on multiple platforms in real‐world conditions: through a 16‐min flight test, including an autonomous landing, of a 66 kg rotorcraft UAV operating in an unconctrolled outdoor environment without using GPS and through a Micro‐UAV operating in a cluttered, unmapped, and gusty indoor environment. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/rob.21454

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 178

Metadata

Authors
Chowdhary, G., Johnson, E. N., Magree, D., Wu, A., & Shein, A.
Venue
Journal of Field Robotics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-03-19
Volume
30
Issue
3
Pages
415-438
ISSN
  • 1556-4959 (ISSN-L)
  • 1556-4967
OpenAlex
W1915368719
Cited by
178
References
7
FWCI
24.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.