The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Autonomous aerial navigation using monocular visual‐inertial fusion
Abstract
Autonomous micro aerial vehicles (MAVs) have cost and mobility benefits, making them ideal robotic platforms for applications including aerial photography, surveillance, and search and rescue. As the platform scales down, MAVs become more capable of operating in confined environments, but it also introduces significant size and payload constraints. A monocular visual‐inertial navigation system (VINS), consisting only of an inertial measurement unit (IMU) and a camera, becomes the most suitable sensor suite in this case, thanks to its light weight and small footprint. In fact, it is the minimum sensor suite allowing autonomous flight with sufficient environmental awareness. In this paper, we show that it is possible to achieve reliable online autonomous navigation using monocular VINS. Our system is built on a customized quadrotor testbed equipped with a fisheye camera, a low‐cost IMU, and heterogeneous onboard computing resources. The backbone of our system is a highly accurate optimization‐based monocular visual‐inertial state estimator with online initialization and self‐extrinsic calibration. An onboard GPU‐based monocular dense mapping module that conditions on the estimated pose provides wide‐angle situational awareness. Finally, an online trajectory planner that operates directly on the incrementally built three‐dimensional map guarantees safe navigation through cluttered environments. Extensive experimental results are provided to validate individual system modules as well as the overall performance in both indoor and outdoor environments.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Multiple View Geometry in Computer Vision
Hartley, R., & Zisserman, A. (2004) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511811685 · Cited by 21,070
Bundle Adjustment — A Modern Synthesis
Triggs, B., McLauchlan, P. F., Hartley, R. I., & Fitzgibbon, A. W. (2000) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/3-540-44480-7_21 · Cited by 3,988
LSD-SLAM: Large-scale direct monocular SLAM
Engel, J., Schöps, T., & Cremers, D. (2014) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-10605-2_54 · Cited by 3,851
DTAM: Dense tracking and mapping in real-time
Newcombe, R. A., Lovegrove, S. J., & Davison, A. J. (2011) · 2011 International Conference on Computer Vision · doi:10.1109/iccv.2011.6126513 · Cited by 2,078
A Machine Learning Approach to Visual Perception of Forest Trails for Mobile Robots
Giusti, A., Guzzi, J., Ciresan, D. C., He, F.-L., Rodriguez, J. P., Fontana, F., Faessler, M., Forster, C., Schmidhuber, J., Caro, G. D., et al. (2016) · IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters · doi:10.1109/lra.2015.2509024 · Cited by 665
REMODE: Probabilistic, monocular dense reconstruction in real time
Pizzoli, M., Forster, C., & Scaramuzza, D. (2014) · 2014 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) · doi:10.1109/icra.2014.6907233 · Cited by 330
Cited by
VINS-Mono: A Robust and Versatile Monocular Visual-Inertial State Estimator
Qin, T., Li, P., & Shen, S. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Robotics · doi:10.1109/tro.2018.2853729 · Cited by 4,669
Self-citationLabbé, M., & Michaud, F. (2019) · Journal of Field Robotics · doi:10.1002/rob.21831 · Cited by 989
A Review of GNSS-Independent UAV Navigation Techniques
Gyagenda, N., Hatilima, J. V., Roth, H., & Zhmud, V. (2022) · Robotics and Autonomous Systems · doi:10.1016/j.robot.2022.104069 · Cited by 190
Metadata
- Authors
- Lin, Y., Gao, F., Qin, T., Gao, W., Liu, T., Wu, W., Yang, Z., & Shen, S.
- Venue
- Journal of Field Robotics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017-07-04
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 23-51
- ISSN
- 1556-4959 (ISSN-L)
- 1556-4967
- OpenAlex
- W2732510496
- Cited by
- 237
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 28.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.