How Are Practice and Performance Related? Development of Reading From Age 5 to 15
Open accessAbstract
Does reading a lot lead to better reading skills, or does reading a lot follow from high initial reading skills? The authors present a longitudinal study of how much children choose to read and how well they decode and comprehend texts. This is the first study to examine the codevelopment of print exposure with both fluency and comprehension throughout childhood using autocorrelations. Print exposure was operationalized as children’s amount of independent reading for pleasure. Two hundred children were followed from age 5 to age 15. Print exposure was assessed at ages 5, 7, 8, 9, and 13. Prereading skills were tested at age 5 and reading skills at ages 7, 8, 9, 14, and 15 (the latter with the Programme for International Student Assessment [PISA]). Before children learned to read (i.e., age 5), prereading skills and print exposure were not linked. Path analyses showed that children’s print exposure and reading skills reciprocally influence each other. During the early school years, the effects run from reading fluency to comprehension and print exposure, so from skills to amount. The effect of accumulated practice only emerged in adolescence. Reading fluency, comprehension, and print exposure were all important predictors of age 15 PISA reading comprehension. These findings were largely confirmed by post hoc models with random intercepts. Because foundational reading skills predicted changes in later reading comprehension and print exposure, the authors speculate that intervening decoding difficulties may positively impact exposure to and comprehension of texts. How much children read seems to matter most after the shift from learning to read to reading to learn.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Difficulties with reading could in turn impact motivation and enjoyment of reading in middle childhood.
“It has also been shown that dif fi culties with reading could in turn impact motivation and enjoyment of reading in middle childhood (Torppa et al., 2020; van Bergen et al., 2021).”
From Longitudinal development of theory of mind in adolescence and its associations with fiction reading experience. (2025) · cites this paper as van Bergen et al., 2021
Cites
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/003465430298487 · Cited by 12,905 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The absence of feedback (as in independent reading) limits the positive effect of practice (Hattie & Timperley, 2007; Reitsma, 1988).”
BackgroundA critique of the cross-lagged panel model
Hamaker, E. L., Kuiper, R. M., & Grasman, R. P. P. P. (2015) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/a0038889 · Cited by 4,005 · see citing works
To read or not to read: a meta-analysis of print exposure from infancy to early adulthood
Mol, S. E., & Bus, A. G. (2011) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0021890 · Cited by 1,299 · see citing works
Phonological recoding and orthographic learning: a direct test of the self-teaching hypothesis
Share, D. L. (1999) · Journal of Experimental Child Psychology · doi:10.1006/jecp.1998.2481 · Cited by 742 · see citing works
Berry, D., & Willoughby, M. T. (2017) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/cdev.12660 · Cited by 737 · see citing works
Macnamara, B. N., Hambrick, D. Z., & Oswald, F. L. (2014) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797614535810 · Cited by 656 · see citing works
Cain, K., & Oakhill, J. (2011) · Journal of Learning Disabilities · doi:10.1177/0022219411410042 · Cited by 300 · see citing works
The Relationship Between Deliberate Practice and Performance in Sports: A Meta-Analysis
Macnamara, B. N., Moreau, D., & Hambrick, D. Z. (2016) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691616635591 · Cited by 248 · see citing works
Pfost, M., Dörfler, T., & Artelt, C. (2013) · Learning and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2013.04.008 · Cited by 155 · see citing works
Why do children read more? The influence of reading ability on voluntary reading practices
van Bergen, E., Snowling, M. J., de Zeeuw, E. L., van Beijsterveldt, C. E. M., Dolan, C. V., & Boomsma, D. I. (2018) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/jcpp.12910 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Altamura, L., Vargas, C., & Salmerón, L. (2025) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543231216463 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
van der Kleij, S. W., Devine, R. T., Shapiro, L. R., Ricketts, J., & Apperly, I. (2025) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/dev0001965 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
- Authors
- van Bergen, E., Vasalampi, K., & Torppa, M.
- Affiliations
- Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam The Netherlands, University of Oxford UK
- University of Jyväskylä (FI)
- Corresponding author
- Vasalampi, Kati
- Torppa, Minna
- Venue
- Reading Research Quarterly
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2020-03-30
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 415-434
- ISSN
- 0034-0553 (ISSN-L)
- 1936-2722
- OpenAlex
- W3014717668
- Cited by
- 96
- References
- 10
- Citations by year
- 2026: 17 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 3
- FWCI
- 13.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Reading Research Quarterly (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- VU Research Portal (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- Jyväskylä University Digital Archive (University of Jyväskylä) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (024.001.003, 446‐12‐005, 451‐15‐017)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
- Social Sciences › Education › Literacy and Educational Practices
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
- Keywords
- print exposure, independent reading, reading fluency, reading comprehension, decoding, reading to learn, reciprocal effects, reading practices, children's reading development, pre-reading skills, decoding difficulties
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review