The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Inquiry projects in science teacher education: What can investigative experiences reveal about teacher thinking and eventual classroom practice?
Abstract
Science education reform documents emphasize the importance of inquiry experiences for young learners. This means that teachers must be prepared with the knowledge, skills, and habits of thinking to mentor their students through authentic investigations. This study examines how preservice teachers' inquiry experiences, in a science methods course, influenced and were influenced by their conceptions of inquiry. The study also assesses how these experiences were associated with eventual classroom practice. Six preservice secondary teachers were observed during a 2‐month inquiry project and then followed into the classroom as they began a 9‐week teaching practicum. Data revealed that participants' preproject conceptions of the inquiry process were related to the conduct and interpretation of their own inquiry project, and that the project experience modified the inquiry conceptions of those participants who already had sophisticated understandings of scientific investigations. Perhaps most importantly, the participants who eventually used guided and open inquiry during their student teaching were not those who had more authentic views of inquiry or reflected most deeply about their own inquiry projects, but rather they were individuals who had significant undergraduate or professional experiences with authentic science research. Finally, this article advocates that independent science investigations be part of preservice education and that these experiences should be scaffolded to prompt reflection specifically about the nature of inquiry and conceptually linked to ways in which inquiry can be brought into the K‐12 classroom. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Sci Ed 87:112–143, 2003; Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com). DOI 10.1002/sce.10044
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 53
- 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199709)34:7<673::AID-TEA2>3.0.CO;2-J · doi:10.1002/(sici)1098-2736(199709)34:7<673::aid-tea2>3.0.co;2-j
- 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199701)34:1<39::AID-TEA4>3.0.CO;2-P · DOI
- American Association for the Advancement of Science(1990).Science for all Americans.New York:Oxford University Press.
- Bencze J. L. &Bowen M. G.(2001).Learner‐controlled projects in science teacher education: Planting seeds for revolutionary change. Paper presented at the annual conference of the National Association of Research in Science Teaching St. Louis MO.
- 10.1086/461782 · DOI
- Boardman‐Haefner L. &Zembal‐Saul C.(2001).Engaging in science as inquiry: Prospective elementary teachers' learning in the context of an innovative life science course. Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Educational Research Association Seattle WA.
- Bowen G. M. &Roth W. M.(1998 April).Isolation of variables and enculturation to a reductionist epistemology during ecology lectures. Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Educational Research Association San Diego CA.
- 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199902)36:2<121::AID-TEA2>3.0.CO;2-U · DOI
- 10.1080/00405849009543440 · doi:10.1080/00405849009543440
- Clandinin D. J., 1986, Classroom practice: Teacher images in practice
- 10.1016/0742-051X(86)90030-2 · DOI
- Clandinin D. J., 1992, The handbook of research on curriculum, 363
- Cruickshank D., 1985, Uses and benefits of reflective teaching, Phi Delta Kappan, 66, 704
- Feiman‐Nemser S., 1985, Pitfalls of experience in teacher preparation, Teachers College Record, 87, 53, 10.1177/016146818508700107 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/tea.3660321006 · doi:10.1002/tea.3660321006
- 10.3102/0013189X028006014 · DOI
- 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199605)33:5<475::AID-TEA2>3.0.CO;2-O · doi:10.1002/(sici)1098-2736(199605)33:5<475::aid-tea2>3.0.co;2-o
- Glaser B. G., 1970, Qualitative methodology, 288
- Grossman P., 1989, Knowledge base for the beginning teacher, 23
- 10.1086/442968 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/sce.3730720103 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/1180143 · doi:10.2307/1180143
- Kennison C.(1990).Enhancing teachers' professional learning: Relationships between school culture and elementary school teachers' beliefs images and ways of knowing. Unpublished specialist thesis Florida State University.
- Keys C. &Bryan L.(2000 April).Inquiry science and the social context of the classroom: A call for research on teacher understanding. Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Educational Research Association New Orleans LA.
- 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199912)36:10<1065::AID-TEA2>3.0.CO;2-I · doi:10.1002/(sici)1098-2736(199912)36:10<1065::aid-tea2>3.0.co;2-i
- 10.4159/9780674039681 · DOI · Paper page
- Latour B., 1987, Science in action
- 10.1002/tea.3660290404 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/002248718703800601 · DOI
- Lortie D., 1975, Schoolteacher
- 10.1080/00405849009543443 · DOI
- 10.3102/0013189X028003014 · DOI
- Miles M., 1994, Qualitative data analysis
- National Research Council(2000).Inquiry and the National Science Education Standards.Washington DC:National Academy Press.
- 10.1080/0022027870190403 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.3102/00346543062003307 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/sce.3730770302 · DOI · Paper page
- Russell T., 1993, The practice of constructivism, 247
- Schon D., 1983, The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action
- Schwab J., 1962, The teaching of science
- Schwab J., 1978, Science, curriculum, and liberal education, 229
- 10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199609)80:5<535::AID-SCE3>3.0.CO;2-C · doi:10.1002/(sici)1098-237x(199609)80:5<535::aid-sce3>3.0.co;2-c
- 10.1111/j.1949-8594.1980.tb09559.x · doi:10.1111/j.1949-8594.1980.tb09559.x
- 10.1002/sce.3730670513 · doi:10.1002/sce.3730670513
- Tobin K., 1994, Handbook of research on science teaching and learning, 43
- 10.1177/002248718503600507 · DOI
- 10.1002/sce.3730770305 · doi:10.1002/sce.3730770305
- Valli I., 1992, Reflective teacher education: Cases and critiques
- 10.1002/sce.3730650106 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/1179907 · DOI
- Windschitl M.(2000 April).An analysis of preservice science teachers' open inquiry experiences. Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Educational Research Association Conference New Orleans LA.
- 10.1080/0260747900160201 · DOI
- 10.1177/002248718103200302 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Schraw, G., Crippen, K. J., & Hartley, K. (2006) · Research in Science Education · doi:10.1007/s11165-005-3917-8 · Cited by 1,529
Identity development as a lens to science teacher preparation
Luehmann, A. L. (2007) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/sce.20209 · Cited by 428
Barak, M., & Dori, Y. J. (2005) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/sce.20027 · Cited by 295
Student-question-based inquiry in science education
Herranen, J., & Aksela, M. (2019) · Studies in Science Education · doi:10.1080/03057267.2019.1658059 · Cited by 91
Inquiry identity and science teacher professional development
Bryce, N., Wilmes, S. E. D., & Bellino, M. (2016) · Cultural Studies of Science Education · doi:10.1007/s11422-015-9725-1 · Cited by 25
Metadata
- Authors
- Windschitl, M.
- Venue
- Science Education
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-12-06
- Volume
- 87
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 112-143
- ISSN
- 0036-8326 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-237X
- OpenAlex
- W2070199886
- Cited by
- 556
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 36.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Inquiry projects in science teacher education: What can investigative experiences reveal about teacher thinking and eventual classroom practice? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/sce.10044
- The paper
- Windschitl, M. (2003). Inquiry projects in science teacher education: What can investigative experiences reveal about teacher thinking and eventual classroom practice? Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10044
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.