The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Learning quanta: Barriers to stimulating transitions in student understanding of orbital ideas
Abstract
This paper reports the results of applying a particular analytical perspective to data from an interview study: a typology of learning impediments informed by research into learning and students' ideas in science. This typology is a heuristic tool that may help diagnose the origins of students' learning difficulties. Here it is applied to data from students interviewed about a problematic curriculum topic—the “oribital” model of atomic and molecular structures. Several specific features of learners' developing ideas about atomic and molecular structures were identified in published reports of the study. In this paper, interview data is examined “through” the analytical lens of the typology to explore possible explanations for students' learning difficulties in the topic. It is suggested that the typology provides a useful perspective for exploring some aspects of students' learning difficulties, but that the previously published form of the typology could be modified to include important additional types of learning impediments. The heuristic value of the typology is demonstrated in terms of the way that the analysis can both inform teaching, and suggest a focus for further research. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Sci Ed 89:94–116, 2005
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information.
Miller, G. A. (1956) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0043158 · Cited by 17,812
BRUNER, J. S. (1960) · doi:10.4159/9780674028999 · Cited by 6,042
Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes
Lakatos, I. (1970) · Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139171434.009 · Cited by 4,649
Thagard, P. (1992) · doi:10.1515/9780691186672 · Cited by 1,066
Cited by
Developing a hypothetical multi‐dimensional learning progression for the nature of matter
Stevens, S. Y., Delgado, C., & Krajcik, J. S. (2010) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.20324 · Cited by 265
Metadata
- Authors
- Taber, K. S.
- Venue
- Science Education
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004
- Volume
- 89
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 94-116
- ISSN
- 0036-8326 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-237X
- OpenAlex
- W1968154426
- Cited by
- 167
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 18.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Learning quanta: Barriers to stimulating transitions in student understanding of orbital ideas. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/sce.20038
- The paper
- Taber, K. S. (2005). Learning quanta: Barriers to stimulating transitions in student understanding of orbital ideas. Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20038
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.