The DOI matches its Crossref record; 86 of the 86 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A theoretical framework for narrative explanation in science
Abstract
This paper deals with a number of conceptual and theoretical issues that underlie the proposal to employ narrative explanations in science education: What is narrative? What is explanation? and What is narrative explanation? In answering these questions, we develop a framework of narrative elements and characteristics of narrative explanations. Two possible examples of narrative explanation are presented and examined in light of the framework. This examination brings to light various conceptual and empirical questions related to the examples and to the larger issue of the use of examples like them in science instruction. The value of the framework lies partly in its power to point to such questions. The questions can guide a program of theoretical and empirical research into the psychological reality of the narrative form of explanation, the existence of narrative explanations in science, the use of narrative explanations in science teaching, and the nature and extent of the narrative effect upon which proposals for the use of narrative often are justified. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Sci Ed, 89:535–563, 2005
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bruner, J. (1986) · doi:10.4159/9780674029019 · Cited by 8,657
(1991) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.28-6498 · Cited by 8,149
(1991) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.28-5764 · Cited by 6,847
Narrative knowing and the human sciences
(1988) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.26-0378 · Cited by 4,882
Fraassen, B. C. V. (1980) · doi:10.1093/0198244274.001.0001 · Cited by 4,682
Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science
Feigl, H., & Scriven, M. S. (1956) · Cited by 4,420
38. After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory
MacIntyre, A. (2016) · Essays and Reviews · doi:10.1515/9781400848393-039 · Cited by 3,326
Aspects of Scientific Explanation.
Resnik, M. D., & Hempel, C. G. (1966) · Philosophy and Phenomenological Research · doi:10.2307/2106169 · Cited by 3,319
Demopoulos, W., & van Fraassen, B. C. (1982) · The Philosophical Review · doi:10.2307/2184804 · Cited by 3,311
Studies in the Logic of Explanation
Hempel, C. G., & Oppenheim, P. (1948) · Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1086/286983 · Cited by 3,174
Cited by
Using narratives and storytelling to communicate science with nonexpert audiences
Dahlstrom, M. F. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1320645111 · Cited by 1,159
Working toward a stronger conceptualization of scientific explanation for science education
Braaten, M., & Windschitl, M. (2011) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/sce.20449 · Cited by 351
An Evaluation of Gamified Training: Using Narrative to Improve Reactions and Learning
Armstrong, M. B., & Landers, R. N. (2017) · Simulation & Gaming · doi:10.1177/1046878117703749 · Cited by 158
Five steps to planning success: experimental evidence from US households
Heinberg, A., Hung, A., Kapteyn, A., Lusardi, A., Samek, A. S., & Yoong, J. (2014) · Oxford Review of Economic Policy · doi:10.1093/oxrep/gru036 · Cited by 51
A Teaching Model for Scaffolding 4th Grade Students’ Scientific Explanation Writing
Yang, H.-T., & Wang, K.-H. (2014) · Research in Science Education · doi:10.1007/s11165-013-9392-8 · Cited by 21
Metadata
- Authors
- Norris, S. P., Guilbert, S. M., Smith, M. L., Hakimelahi, S., & Phillips, L. M.
- Venue
- Science Education
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005
- Volume
- 89
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 535-563
- ISSN
- 0036-8326 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-237X
- OpenAlex
- W2118257175
- Cited by
- 324
- References
- 86
- FWCI
- 34.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A theoretical framework for narrative explanation in science. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/sce.20063
- The paper
- Norris, S. P., Guilbert, S. M., Smith, M. L., Hakimelahi, S., & Phillips, L. M. (2005). A theoretical framework for narrative explanation in science. Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20063
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.