The DOI matches its Crossref record; 65 of the 65 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Working toward a stronger conceptualization of scientific explanation for science education
Abstract
Scientific explanation plays a central role in science education reform documents, including the Benchmarks for Science Literacy, the National Science Education Standards, and the recent research report,Taking Science to School. While scientific explanation receives significant emphases in these documents, there is little discussion or consensus within the science education community about the nature of explanation itself. However, debates about scientific explanation have been a mainstay for philosophers of science for decades. We argue that a more clearly articulated conceptualization of scientific explanation for science education is necessary for making the vision of science education reform a reality. In this essay, we use major philosophical theories of scientific explanation as lenses to examine how the science education community has constructed the idea of explanation. We also examine instructional practice in school science settings, including our own classrooms, where teachers and students are working to explain natural phenomena. Using these examples, we offer suggestions for preparing both educators and young learners to engage in explanatory discourses that are reasonably accountable to authentic epistemic practice in science. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.Sci Ed95:639–669, 2011
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
National Science Education Standards
Shea, J. H. (1995) · Journal of Geological Education · doi:10.5408/0022-1368-43.2.102 · Cited by 7,888
Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts
Latour, B. (1986) · DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) · Cited by 7,491
Fraassen, B. C. V. (1980) · doi:10.1093/0198244274.001.0001 · Cited by 4,682
Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science
Feigl, H., & Scriven, M. S. (1956) · Cited by 4,420
Talking science: language, learning, and values
(1991) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.28-5211 · Cited by 3,996
Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge
Knorr Cetina, K. (1999) · Harvard University Press eBooks · doi:10.4159/9780674039681 · Cited by 3,956
Aspects of Scientific Explanation.
Resnik, M. D., & Hempel, C. G. (1966) · Philosophy and Phenomenological Research · doi:10.2307/2106169 · Cited by 3,319
Demopoulos, W., & van Fraassen, B. C. (1982) · The Philosophical Review · doi:10.2307/2184804 · Cited by 3,311
Studies in the Logic of Explanation
Hempel, C. G., & Oppenheim, P. (1948) · Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1086/286983 · Cited by 3,174
Taking science to school: learning and teaching science in grades K-8
(2008) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.45-3327 · Cited by 2,480
Cited by
Benedict-Chambers, A., Kademian, S. M., Davis, E. A., & Palincsar, A. S. (2017) · International Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/09500693.2017.1366674 · Cited by 68
Watkins, J., & Manz, E. (2022) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/sce.21747 · Cited by 56
Learner experience in artificial intelligence-scaffolded argumentation
Kim, M. K., Kim, N. J., & Heidari, A. (2022) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2022.2042792 · Cited by 51
Wiley, J., Hastings, P., Blaum, D., Jaeger, A. J., Hughes, S., Wallace, P., Griffin, T. D., & Britt, M. A. (2017) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.1007/s40593-017-0138-z · Cited by 49
Engaging Girls’ Sociohistorical Identities in Science
Thompson, J. (2014) · Journal of the Learning Sciences · doi:10.1080/10508406.2014.888351 · Cited by 47
Metadata
- Authors
- Braaten, M., & Windschitl, M.
- Venue
- Science Education
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-05-23
- Volume
- 95
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 639-669
- ISSN
- 0036-8326 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-237X
- OpenAlex
- W2023180340
- Cited by
- 351
- References
- 65
- FWCI
- 85.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Working toward a stronger conceptualization of scientific explanation for science education. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/sce.20449
- The paper
- Braaten, M., & Windschitl, M. (2011). Working toward a stronger conceptualization of scientific explanation for science education. Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20449
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.