The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Thinking about systems: student and teacher conceptions of natural and social systems
Abstract
Many in the system dynamics community argue that children are natural systems thinkers. Here we study how middle school students and teachers think about everyday settings involving feedback, stocks and flows, time delays and nonlinearities, prior to any formal training in these concepts. We develop instruments to elicit understanding of systems concepts and test them with students and teachers from two middle schools in the U.S.A. We find, with some exceptions, generally limited intuitive systems thinking abilities. “Open‐loop” or one‐way causal thinking is common. Explanations lack references to time horizons and time delays. Significant misconceptions of stock and flow structures appear regardless of age. Teachers generally outperformed students, although one‐quarter of the students performed at the median level for teachers. We discuss the nature of students' and teachers' intuitive models of dynamic systems, explore potential barriers to understanding dynamic systems, and discuss implications for effective teaching of systems concepts. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
BRUNER, J. S. (1960) · doi:10.4159/9780674028999 · Cited by 6,042
The construction of reality in the child.
Piaget, J. (1954) · doi:10.1037/11168-000 · Cited by 4,558
Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. (1968) · The Urban Review · doi:10.1007/bf02322211 · Cited by 3,878
Learning in and about complex systems
Sterman, J. D. (1994) · System Dynamics Review · doi:10.1002/sdr.4260100214 · Cited by 1,279
Self-citationBathtub dynamics: initial results of a systems thinking inventory
Sweeney, L. B., & Sterman, J. D. (2000) · System Dynamics Review · doi:10.1002/sdr.198 · Cited by 763
Self-citationNisbett, R. E., Fong, G. T., Lehman, D. R., & Cheng, P. W. (1987) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.3672116 · Cited by 272
Cited by
Ballew, M. T., Goldberg, M. H., Rosenthal, S. A., Gustafson, A., & Leiserowitz, A. (2019) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1819310116 · Cited by 81
Endres, T., Lovell, O., Morkunas, D., Rieß, W., & Renkl, A. (2023) · British Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjep.12563 · Cited by 57
How is the body's systemic nature manifested amongst high school biology students?
Tripto, J., Assaraf, O. B. Z., Snapir, Z., & Amit, M. (2017) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-016-9390-0 · Cited by 42
Metadata
- Authors
- Sweeney, L. B., & Sterman, J. D.
- Venue
- System Dynamics Review
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-06
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 2-3
- Pages
- 285-311
- ISSN
- 0883-7066 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-1727
- OpenAlex
- W2130373961
- Cited by
- 261
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 6.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Thinking about systems: student and teacher conceptions of natural and social systems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/sdr.366
- The paper
- Sweeney, L. B., & Sterman, J. D. (2007). Thinking about systems: student and teacher conceptions of natural and social systems. System Dynamics Review. https://doi.org/10.1002/sdr.366
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.