The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Systems thinking as a pathway to global warming beliefs and attitudes through an ecological worldview
Abstract
Prior research has found that systems thinking, the tendency to perceive phenomena as interconnected and dynamic, is associated with a general proenvironmental orientation. However, less is known about its relationship with public understanding of climate change and/or whether this relationship varies across people with different political views. Because climate change is a highly politicized issue, it is also important to understand the extent to which systems thinking can foster acceptance of climate science across political lines. Using an online sample of US adults ( n = 1,058), we tested the degree to which systems thinking predicts global warming beliefs and attitudes (e.g., believing that global warming is happening, that it is human-caused, etc.), independent of an ecological worldview (i.e., the New Ecological Paradigm). We found that although systems thinking is positively related to global warming beliefs and attitudes, the relationships are almost fully explained by an ecological worldview. Indirect effects of systems thinking are consistently strong across political ideologies and party affiliations, although slightly stronger for conservatives and Republicans than for liberals and Democrats, respectively. We did not find evidence of the converse: Systems thinking does not seem to mediate the relationship between an ecological worldview and global warming beliefs and attitudes. Together, these findings suggest that systems thinking may support the adoption of global warming beliefs and attitudes indirectly by helping to develop an ecological ethic that people should take care of and not abuse the environment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Other scholars have also identified how idea framing plays a key role in how groups of policy actors interact with policy ideas and concepts, either adopting them or disagreeing with them (Ballew et al., 2019; Lakoff, 2010; Liou et al., 2021; Sanderson et al., 2018).”
From The Circular Economy in European Union Policy: Explaining an idea's success through policy learning (2024) · cites this paper as Ballew et al., 2019
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Dunlap, R. E., Van Liere, K. D., Mertig, A. G., & Jones, R. E. (2000) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00176 · Cited by 5,678
Political conservatism as motivated social cognition.
Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W., & Sulloway, F. J. (2003) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.339 · Cited by 4,904 · cited 1×
“Prior research has found that compared with conservatives, liberals have more openness to complexity and more tolerance for ambiguity and uncertainty (16, 17).”
BackgroundMeta-analyses of the determinants and outcomes of belief in climate change
Hornsey, M. J., Harris, E. A., Bain, P. G., & Fielding, K. S. (2016) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/nclimate2943 · Cited by 1,616 · cited 1×
“These predictive effects across the political spectrum suggest that systems thinking may be an effective mechanism to help the public engage with the issue of climate change, given that climate change is highly politicized in the United States, and political views play a strong role in shaping climate change opinions…”
BackgroundThe Moral Roots of Environmental Attitudes
Feinberg, M., & Willer, R. (2013) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797612449177 · Cited by 928 · cited 3×
“Adding to research in this area (29, 30, 34, 35), our data suggest that systems thinking may be one pathway to encourage conservatives and Republicans to adopt a more ecological worldview, which may then bolster acceptance and understanding of climate change.”
BackgroundSolution aversion: On the relation between ideology and motivated disbelief.
Campbell, T. H., & Kay, A. C. (2014) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0037963 · Cited by 560
A novel measure of effect size for mediation analysis
Lachowicz, M. J., Preacher, K. J., & Kelley, K. (2018) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/met0000165 · Cited by 271
The Theoretical Nature of Systems Thinking. Perspectives on Systems Thinking in Biology Education
Verhoeff, R. P., Knippels, M.-C. P. J., Gilissen, M. G. R., & Boersma, K. T. (2018) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2018.00040 · Cited by 151
Research works printed but not linked: 29
- ; National Research Council Science for Environmental Protection: The Road Ahead (National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2012).
- JM Randle, ML Stroink, The development and initial validation of the paradigm of systems thinking. Syst Res Behav Sci 35, 645–657 (2018). · DOI
- AC Davis, ML Stroink, The relationship between systems thinking and the New Ecological Paradigm. Syst Res Behav Sci 33, 575–586 (2016). · DOI
- ; National Research Council A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices Crosscutting Concepts and Core Ideas (National Academies Press Washington DC) 10.17226/13165. (2012). · DOI
- ; Next Generation Science Standards Lead States Next Generation Science Standards: For States by States (National Academies Press Washington DC) 10.17226/18290. (2013). · DOI
- OJH Bosch, CA King, JL Herbohn, IW Russell, CS Smith, Getting the big picture in natural resource management—Systems thinking as ‘method’ for scientists, policy makers and other stakeholders. Syst Res Behav Sci 24, 217–232 (2007). · DOI
- PH Thibodeau, CM Frantz, ML Stroink, Situating a measure of systems thinking in a landscape of psychological constructs. Syst Res Behav Sci 33, 753–769 (2016). · DOI
- SB Lezak, PH Thibodeau, Systems thinking and environmental concern. J Environ Psychol 46, 143–153 (2016). · DOI
- RE Dunlap, The New Environmental Paradigm Scale: From marginality to worldwide use. J Environ Educ 40, 3–18 (2008). · DOI
- AC Davis, W Leppanen, KP Mularczyk, T Bedard, ML Stroink, Systems thinkers express an elevated capacity for the allocentric components of cognitive and affective empathy. Syst Res Behav Sci 35, 216–229 (2018). · DOI
- S Luckett, Environmental paradigms, biodiversity conservation, and critical systems thinking. Syst Pract Action Res 17, 511–534 (2004). · DOI
- RE Dunlap, AM McCright, JH Yarosh, The political divide on climate change: Partisan polarization widens in the US. Environ Sci Policy Sustainable Dev 58, 4–23 (2016). · DOI · Paper page
- A Van Hiel, E Onraet, S De Pauw, The relationship between social-cultural attitudes and behavioral measures of cognitive style: A meta-analytic integration of studies. J Pers 78, 1765–1799 (2010). · DOI
- AR Pearson, MT Ballew, S Naiman, JP Schuldt, Race, class, gender and climate change communication. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Climate Science, ed H Von Storch (Oxford Univ Press, New York), pp. 349–374 (2017).
- AF Hayes Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach (Guilford Publications, New York, 2013).
- MJ Brandt, Do the disadvantaged legitimize the social system? A large-scale test of the status-legitimacy hypothesis. J Pers Soc Psychol 104, 765–785 (2013). · DOI
- R Paternoster, R Brame, P Mazerolle, A Piquero, Using the correct statistical test for the equality of regression coefficients. Criminology 36, 859–866 (1998). · DOI
- J Cohen, A power primer. Psychol Bull 112, 155–159 (1992). · DOI · Paper page
- C Wolsko, H Ariceaga, J Seiden, Red, white, and blue enough to be green: Effects of moral framing on climate change attitudes and conservation behaviors. J Exp Soc Psychol 65, 7–19 (2016). · DOI · Paper page
- LC Hamilton, Education, politics, and opinions about climate change evidence for interaction effects. Clim Change 104, 231–214 (2011). · DOI · Paper page
- AM McCright, RE Dunlap, The politicization of climate change and polarization in the American public’s views of global warming, 2001-2010. Soc Q 52, 155–194 (2011). · DOI · Paper page
- M Baldwin, J Lammers, Past-focused environmental comparisons promote proenvironmental outcomes for conservatives. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 113, 14953–14957 (2016). · DOI
- P Checkland, Four conditions for serious systems thinking and action. Syst Res Behav Sci 29, 465–469 (2012). · DOI
- KE Maani, V Maharaj, Links between systems thinking and complex decision making. Syst Dyn Rev 20, 21–48 (2004). · DOI
- T Hargreaves, M Nye, J Burgess, Making energy visible: A qualitative field study of how householders interact with feedback from smart energy monitors. Ener Policy 38, 6111–6119 (2010). · DOI
- A Bostrom, MG Morgan, B Fischhoff, D Read, What do people know about global climate change? 1. Mental models. Risk Anal 14, 959–970 (1994). · DOI
- JD Sterman, LB Sweeney, Understanding public complacency about climate change: Adults’ mental models of climate change violate conservation of matter. Clim Change 80, 213–238 (2007). · DOI
- LB Sweeney, JD Sterman, Thinking about systems: Student and teacher conceptions of natural and social systems. Syst Dyn Rev 23, 285–312 (2007). · DOI
- PH Thibodeau, CM Frantz, M Berretta, The Earth is our home: Systemic metaphors to redefine our relationship with nature. Clim Change 142, 287–300 (2017). · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Online panels in social science research: Expanding sampling methods beyond Mechanical Turk
Chandler, J., Rosenzweig, C., Moss, A. J., Robinson, J., & Litman, L. (2019) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-019-01273-7 · Cited by 668
Parmentier, M.-L., Weiss, K., Aroua, A., Betry, C., Rivière, M., & Navarro, O. (2024) · Journal of Anxiety Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2023.102799 · Cited by 73
Mangino, D. R., Bernhard, T., Wakim, P., & Kim, S. Y. (2021) · The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.jagp.2020.07.013 · Cited by 24
The Circular Economy in European Union Policy: Explaining an idea's success through policy learning
Pinyol Alberich, J., & Hartley, S. (2024) · Environmental Policy and Governance · doi:10.1002/eet.2088 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Ballew, M. T., Goldberg, M. H., Rosenthal, S. A., Gustafson, A., & Leiserowitz, A.
- Affiliations
- Yale Program on Climate Change Communication, Yale School of Forestry & Environmental Studies, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Publisher
- National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2019-04-08
- Volume
- 116
- Issue
- 17
- Pages
- 8214-8219
- ISSN
- 0027-8424
- 1091-6490
- Cited by
- 81
- References
- 7
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Systems thinking as a pathway to global warming beliefs and attitudes through an ecological worldview. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.1819310116
- The paper
- Ballew, M. T., Goldberg, M. H., Rosenthal, S. A., Gustafson, A., & Leiserowitz, A. (2019). Systems thinking as a pathway to global warming beliefs and attitudes through an ecological worldview. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1819310116
