The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Secure communication for the Internet of Things—a comparison of link‐layer security and IPsec for 6LoWPAN
Abstract
The future Internet is an IPv6 network interconnecting traditional computers and a large number of smart objects. This Internet of Things (IoT) will be the foundation of many services and our daily life will depend on its availability and reliable operation. Therefore, among many other issues, the challenge of implementing secure communication in the IoT must be addressed. In the traditional Internet, IPsec is the established and tested way of securing networks. It is therefore reasonable to explore the option of using IPsec as a security mechanism for the IoT. Smart objects are generally added to the Internet using IPv6 over Low‐power Wireless Personal Area Networks (6LoWPAN), which defines IP communication for resource‐constrained networks. Thus, to provide security for the IoT based on the trusted and tested IPsec mechanism, it is necessary to define an IPsec extension of 6LoWPAN. In this paper, we present such a 6LoWPAN/IPsec extension and show the viability of this approach. We describe our 6LoWPAN/IPsec implementation, which we evaluate and compare with our implementation of IEEE 802.15.4 link‐layer security. We also show that it is possible to reuse crypto hardware within existing IEEE 802.15.4 transceivers for 6LoWPAN/IPsec. The evaluation results show that IPsec is a feasible option for securing the IoT in terms of packet size, energy consumption, memory usage, and processing time. Furthermore, we demonstrate that in contrast to common belief, IPsec scales better than link‐layer security as the data size and the number of hops grow, resulting in time and energy savings. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Internet Key Exchange Protocol Version 2 (IKEv2)
Kaufman, C., Hoffman, P., Nir, Y., Eronen, P., & Kivinen, T. (2014) · doi:10.17487/rfc7296 · Cited by 340
Cited by
Internet of Things: A Survey on Enabling Technologies, Protocols, and Applications
Al-Fuqaha, A., Guizani, M., Mohammadi, M., Aledhari, M., & Ayyash, M. (2015) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2015.2444095 · Cited by 8,630
IoT security: Review, blockchain solutions, and open challenges
Khan, M. A., & Salah, K. (2018) · Future Generation Computer Systems · doi:10.1016/j.future.2017.11.022 · Cited by 2,488
SVELTE: Real-time intrusion detection in the Internet of Things
Raza, S., Wallgren, L., & Voigt, T. (2013) · Ad Hoc Networks · doi:10.1016/j.adhoc.2013.04.014 · Cited by 907
Self-citationRouting Attacks and Countermeasures in the RPL-Based Internet of Things
Wallgren, L., Raza, S., & Voigt, T. (2013) · International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks · doi:10.1155/2013/794326 · Cited by 483
Self-citationLithe: Lightweight Secure CoAP for the Internet of Things
Raza, S., Shafagh, H., Hewage, K., Hummen, R., & Voigt, T. (2013) · IEEE Sensors Journal · doi:10.1109/jsen.2013.2277656 · Cited by 375
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Raza, S., Duquennoy, S., Höglund, J., Roedig, U., & Voigt, T.
- Venue
- Security and Communication Networks
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-01-18
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 2654-2668
- ISSN
- 1939-0114 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-0122
- OpenAlex
- W2127305011
- Cited by
- 185
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 18.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Secure communication for the Internet of Things—a comparison of link‐layer security and IPsec for 6LoWPAN. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/sec.406
- The paper
- Raza, S., Duquennoy, S., Höglund, J., Roedig, U., & Voigt, T. (2014). Secure communication for the Internet of Things—a comparison of link‐layer security and IPsec for 6LoWPAN. Security and Communication Networks. https://doi.org/10.1002/sec.406
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.