Cited by 483Security in Wireless Sensor NetworksNetwork Security and Intrusion DetectionIPv6, Mobility, Handover, Networks, Security

Routing Attacks and Countermeasures in the RPL-Based Internet of Things

Open access
Wallgren, Linus, Raza, Shahid, Voigt, Thiemo·2013·International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks

Abstract

The Routing Protocol for Low-Power and Lossy Networks (RPL) is a novel routing protocol standardized for constrained environments such as 6LoWPAN networks. Providing security in IPv6/RPL connected 6LoWPANs is challenging because the devices are connected to the untrusted Internet and are resource constrained, the communication links are lossy, and the devices use a set of novel IoT technologies such as RPL, 6LoWPAN, and CoAP/CoAPs. In this paper we provide a comprehensive analysis of IoT technologies and their new security capabilities that can be exploited by attackers or IDSs. One of the major contributions in this paper is our implementation and demonstration of well-known routing attacks against 6LoWPAN networks running RPL as a routing protocol. We implement these attacks in the RPL implementation in the Contiki operating system and demonstrate these attacks in the Cooja simulator. Furthermore, we highlight novel security features in the IPv6 protocol and exemplify the use of these features for intrusion detection in the IoT by implementing a lightweight heartbeat protocol.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1155/2013/794326

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A variety of data augmentation techniques, including shifting sensor locations, arbitrary rotations, permuting sensor event locations, time warping, and scaling, will significantly improve the performance of deep learning-based human activity recognition.

    “A variety of data augmentation techniques, including shifting the locations of sensors, arbitrary rotations, permuting the locations where sensor events occurred, time warping, and scaling, will significantly improve the performance of deep learning-based human activity recognition [242].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wallgren, L., Raza, S., & Voigt, T.
Affiliations
  • SICS Swedish ICT, Isafjordsgatan 22, 16440 Kista, Stockholm, Sweden
  • Uppsala University (SE)
Corresponding author
Raza, Shahid
Venue
International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks
Published
2013-08-01
Volume
9
Issue
8
Pages
794326
ISSN
  • 1550-1329 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-1477
OpenAlex
W2026609766
Cited by
483
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 44 · 2021: 65 · 2020: 70 · 2019: 63 · 2018: 54 · 2017: 38 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 1
FWCI
20.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • European Commission (FP7-ICT-2011.1.3-288879)
  • Swedish Institute of Computer Science (FP7-ICT-2011.1.3-288879)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Security in Wireless Sensor Networks
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Network Security and Intrusion Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › IPv6, Mobility, Handover, Networks, Security
Keywords
RPL routing protocol, Internet of Things security, routing attacks, 6LoWPAN, intrusion detection, resource-constrained devices, Contiki, Cooja simulator, CoAP

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review