Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 796

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The accidental entrepreneur: the emergent and collective process of user entrepreneurship

Open access
Shah, Sonali K., Tripsas, Mary·2007·Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal
DOI 10.1002/sej.15
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

We develop a process model of how users, an understudied source of entrepreneurship, create, evaluate, share, and commercialize their ideas. We compare and contrast our model to the classic model of the entrepreneurial process, highlighting the emergent and collective nature of the user's entrepreneurial process. Users are often ‘accidental’ entrepreneurs who happen upon an idea through their own use and then share it with others; more specifically, the development of an idea and subsequent experimentation, adaptation, and preliminary adoption often occur before that idea is formally evaluated as the basis of a commercial venture. Users also tend to engage in collective creative activity prior to firm formation—often within the social context provided by user communities—that results in the improvement of ideas. Finally, we provide detailed data on the prevalence of user entrepreneurship in the juvenile products industry. Copyright © 2007 Strategic Management Society.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/sej.15

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 84

  1. Agarwal A, 2004, Knowledge transfer through inheritance: spin‐out generation, development and survival, Academy of Management Journal, 47, 501, 10.2307/20159599 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Aldrich H, 1986, The Art and Science of Entrepreneurship, 3
  3. Allen RC., 1983, Collective invention, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 4, 1, 10.1016/0167-2681(83)90023-9 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Amit R, 1995, Opportunity costs and entrepreneurial activity, Journal of Business Venturing, 10, 95, 10.1016/0883-9026(94)00017-O · DOI · Paper page
  5. Arrow KJ., 1974, Limited knowledge and economic analysis, American Economic Review, 64, 1
  6. Ashforth BE, 1989, Social identity theory and the organization, Academy of Management Review, 14, 20, 10.2307/258189 · doi:10.2307/258189 · Paper page
  7. Audretsch DB, 1996, R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production, American Economic Review, 86, 630
  8. Baker T, 2003, Improvising firms: bricolage, account giving and improvisational competencies in the founding process, Research Policy, 32, 255, 10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00099-9 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Baldwin C, 2006, How user innovations become commercial products: a theoretical investigation and case study, Research Policy, 35, 1291, 10.1016/j.respol.2006.04.012 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Baldwin CY, 2003, Managing in the Modular Age: Architecture, 149
  11. Bhide AV., 2000, The Origin and Evolution of New Business, 10.1093/oso/9780195131444.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Brown JS, 2001, Knowledge and organization: a social‐practice perspective, Organization Science, 12, 198, 10.1287/orsc.12.2.198.10116 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Burton MD, 2002, Social Structure and Organizations Revisited, 229, 10.1016/S0733-558X(02)19007-0 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Carroll GR, 1987, The career dynamics of self‐employment, Administrative Science Quarterly, 32, 570, 10.2307/2392884 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Casey S., 1997, Women Invent!: Two Centuries of Discoveries That Have Shaped Our World
  16. Casson M., 1982, The Entrepreneur: An Economic Theory
  17. Chatterji AK, 2007, Professional users as a source of innovation: the role of physician innovation in the medical device industry
  18. Clark KB., 1985, The interaction of design hierarchies and market concepts in technological evolution, Research Policy, 14, 235, 10.1016/0048-7333(85)90007-1 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Cohen WM, 1990, Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation, Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 128, 10.2307/2393553 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Cooper AC., 1985, The role of incubator organizations in the founding of growth‐oriented firms, Journal of Business Venturing, 1, 75, 10.1016/0883-9026(85)90008-4 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Dahlin K, 2004, Today's Edisons or weekend hobbyists: technical merit and success of inventions by independent inventors, Research Policy, 33, 1167, 10.1016/j.respol.2004.06.003 · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2004.06.003
  22. Dutton JE, 1994, Organizational images and member identification, Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, 239, 10.2307/2393235 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Eckhardt JT, 2003, Opportunities and entrepreneurship, Journal of Management, 29, 333, 10.1177/014920630302900304 · doi:10.1177/014920630302900304 · Paper page
  24. Eisenhardt KM., 1989, Making fast strategic decisions in high‐velocity environments, Academy of Management Journal, 32, 543, 10.2307/256434 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Enos JL., 1962, Petroleum Progress and Profits: a History of Process Innovation
  26. Feldman MP, 2005, Creating a cluster while building a firm: entrepreneurs and the formation of industrial clusters, Regional Studies, 39, 129, 10.1080/0034340052000320888 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Fenster JM., 1999, The woman who invented the dishwasher, Invention & Technology, 15, 54
  28. Ferris T., 2002, Seeing in the Dark: How Backyard Stargazers Are Probing Deep Space and Guarding Earth from Interplanetary Peril
  29. Fleming L., 2001, Recombinant uncertainty in technological search, Management Science, 47, 117, 10.1287/mnsc.47.1.117.10671 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Franke N, 2003, How communities support innovative activities: an exploration of assistance and sharing among end‐users, Research Policy, 32, 157, 10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00006-9 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Franke N, 2003, Satisfying heterogeneous user needs via innovation toolkits: the case of Apache security software, Research Policy, 32, 1199, 10.1016/S0048-7333(03)00049-0 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Franz K., 2005, Tinkering: Consumers Reinvent the Early Automobile, 10.9783/9780812201932 · DOI
  33. Freeman C., 1968, Chemical process plant: innovation and the world market, National Institute Economic Review, 45, 29, 10.1177/002795016804500104 · DOI
  34. Freiberger P, 2000, Fire in the Valley
  35. Garud R, 1994, A socio‐cognitive model of technology evolution: the case of cochlear implants, Organizational Science, 5, 344, 10.1287/orsc.5.3.344 · DOI · Paper page
  36. Gimeno J, 1997, Survival of the fittest? Entrepreneurial human capital and the persistence of underperforming firms, Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 750, 10.2307/2393656 · DOI · Paper page
  37. Gompers P, 2005, Entrepreneurial spawning: public corporations and the genesis of new ventures, 1986 to 1999, Journal of Finance, 60, 577, 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2005.00740.x · DOI · Paper page
  38. Hargadon AB, 2006, When collections of creatives become creative collectives: a field study of problem solving at work, Organization Science, 17, 484, 10.1287/orsc.1060.0200 · DOI · Paper page
  39. Hayek FA., 1945, The use of knowledge in society, American Economic Review, 35, 519
  40. Heller MA, 1998, Can patents deter innovation? The anticommons in biomedical research, Science, 280, 698, 10.1126/science.280.5364.698 · DOI · Paper page
  41. Hertel G, 2003, Motivation of software developers in Open Source projects: an Internet‐based survey of contributors to the Linux kernel, Research Policy, 32, 1159, 10.1016/S0048-7333(03)00047-7 · DOI · Paper page
  42. Kalnins A, 2006, Social capital, geography, and survival: Gujarati immigrant entrepreneurs in the US lodging industry, Management Science, 52, 233, 10.1287/mnsc.1050.0481 · DOI · Paper page
  43. Kirzner IM., 1997, Entrepreneurial discovery and the competitive market process: an Austrian approach, Journal of Economic Literature, 35, 60
  44. Klepper S., 2001, Employee startups in high‐tech industries, Industrial and Corporate Change, 10, 639, 10.1093/icc/10.3.639 · DOI · Paper page
  45. Klepper S., 2007, Disagreements, spinoffs, and the evolution of Detroit as the capital of the U.S. automobile industry, Management Science, 53, 616, 10.1287/mnsc.1060.0683 · DOI · Paper page
  46. Klepper S, 2005, Entry by spinoffs, Management Science, 51, 1291, 10.1287/mnsc.1050.0411 · DOI · Paper page
  47. Kline R, 1996, Users as agents of technological change: the social construction of the automobile in the rural United States, Technology and Culture, 37, 763, 10.1353/tech.1996.0006 · doi:10.1353/tech.1996.0006 · Paper page
  48. Knight KE., 1963, A fast sort of country: a study of technological innovation: the evolution of digital computers
  49. Langlois RN, 1992, Networks and innovation in a modular system: lessons from the microcomputer and stereo component industries, Research Policy, 21, 297, 10.1016/0048-7333(92)90030-8 · DOI · Paper page
  50. Lilien GL, 2002, Performance assessment of the lead user idea‐generation process for new product development, Management Science, 48, 1042, 10.1287/mnsc.48.8.1042.171 · DOI · Paper page
  51. Luthje C, 2005, User‐innovators and ‘local’ information: the case of mountain biking, Research Policy, 34, 951, 10.1016/j.respol.2005.05.005 · DOI · Paper page
  52. ModyC.2006.Corporations communities and instrumental communities: commercializing probe microscopy 1981–1996. Working paper Chemical Heritage Foundation: Philadelphia PA. · doi:10.1353/tech.2006.0085
  53. Morrison PD, 2000, Determinants of user innovation and innovation sharing in a local market, Management Science, 46, 1513, 10.1287/mnsc.46.12.1513.12076 · DOI · Paper page
  54. Mowery DC., 2005, University Entrepreneurship and Technology Transfers, 38
  55. Muniz AM, 2005, Religiosity in the abandoned Apple Newton brand community, Journal of Consumer Research, 31, 737, 10.1086/426607 · DOI · Paper page
  56. Nelson RR, 1982, An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change, 96
  57. Phillips DJ., 2002, A genealogical approach to organizational life chances: the parent‐progeny transfer among Silicon Valley law firms, 1946–1996, Administrative Science Quarterly, 47, 474, 10.2307/3094848 · DOI · Paper page
  58. Polanyi M., 1958, Personal Knowledge; Towards a Post‐Critical Philosophy
  59. Reynolds P, 1997, The Entrepreneurial Process
  60. Rindova VP, 2001, Continuous ‘morphing’: competing through dynamic capabilities, form, and function, Academy of Management Journal, 44, 1263, 10.2307/3069400 · DOI · Paper page
  61. Ruef M., 2005, Entrepreneurship, 63, 10.1016/S0277-2833(05)15004-3 · doi:10.1016/s0277-2833(05)15004-3
  62. Schrader S., 1991, Informal technology transfer between firms: cooperation through information trading, Research Policy, 20, 153, 10.1016/0048-7333(91)90077-4 · DOI · Paper page
  63. Scott Morton FM, 2002, Love or money? The effects of owner motivation in the California wine industry, Journal of Industrial Economics, 50, 431, 10.1111/1467-6451.00185 · DOI
  64. Shah SK., 2003, Community‐based innovation and product development: findings from open source software and consumer sporting goods
  65. Shane S., 2001, Technology regimes and new firm formation, Management Science, 47, 1173, 10.1287/mnsc.47.9.1173.9785 · DOI · Paper page
  66. Shane S, 2000, The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research, Academy of Management Review, 25, 217
  67. Staudenmayer N, 2005, Interfirm modularity and the implications for product development, Jounal of Product Innovation Management, 22, 303, 10.1111/j.0737-6782.2005.00128.x · DOI
  68. Stuart TE, 2006, When do scientists become entrepreneurs? The social structural antecedent of commercial activity in the academic life sciences, American Journal of Sociology, 112, 97, 10.1086/502691 · DOI · Paper page
  69. Szulanski G., 1995, Unpacking stickiness: an empirical investigation of the barriers to transfer best practice inside the firm, Academy of Management Journal, Best Paper Proceeding, 437
  70. Taylor A, 2006, Superman or the Fantastic Four? Knowledge combination and experience in innovative teams, Academy of Management Journal, 49, 723, 10.5465/amj.2006.22083029 · DOI · Paper page
  71. Tripsas M., 2008, Customer preference discontinuities: a trigger for radical technological change, Managerial and Decision Economics, 10.1002/mde.1389 · DOI
  72. Tushman ML, 1986, Technological discontinuities and organizational environments, Administrative Science Quarterly, 31, 439, 10.2307/2392832 · DOI · Paper page
  73. Tushman ML, 1992, Organizational Behavior Research, 311
  74. Utterback JM., 1994, Mastering the Dynamics of Innovation
  75. Venkataraman S., 1997, Advances in Entrepreneurship, Firm Emergence, and Growth, 119
  76. von Hippel E., 1975, The dominant role of users in the scientific instrument innovation process, Research Policy, 5, 212, 10.1016/0048-7333(76)90028-7 · DOI · Paper page
  77. von Hippel E., 1977, The dominant role of the user in semiconductor and electronic subassembly process innovation, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 24, 60, 10.1109/TEM.1977.6447336 · DOI
  78. von Hippel E., 1986, Lead users: a source of novel product concepts, Management Science, 32, 791, 10.1287/mnsc.32.7.791 · DOI · Paper page
  79. von Hippel E., 1988, The Sources of Innovation
  80. von Hippel E., 1994, ‘Sticky information’ and the locus of problem solving: implications for innovation, Management Science, 40, 429, 10.1287/mnsc.40.4.429 · DOI · Paper page
  81. Wenger E., 1998, Communities of Practice, 10.1017/CBO9780511803932 · DOI · Paper page
  82. Winter SG, 2001, Replication as strategy, Organization Science, 12, 730, 10.1287/orsc.12.6.730.10084 · DOI · Paper page
  83. Ziedonis RH., 2004, Don't fence me in: fragmented markets for technology and the patent acquisition strategies of firms, Management Science, 50, 804, 10.1287/mnsc.1040.0208 · DOI · Paper page
  84. Zucker LG, 1998, Intellectual human capital and the birth of U.S. biotechnology enterprises, American Economic Review, 88, 290

Cited by

See all 796

Metadata

Authors
Shah, S. K., & Tripsas, M.
Venue
Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-11
Volume
1
Issue
1-2
Pages
123-140
ISSN
  • 1932-4391 (ISSN-L)
  • 1932-443X
DOI
10.1002/sej.15
OpenAlex
W3126004373
Cited by
796
References
2
FWCI
28.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor, 15 d)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.