Cited by 450Statistical Methods and InferenceStatistical Methods in EpidemiologyProbability and Statistical Research

A new measure of prognostic separation in survival data

Royston, Patrick, Sauerbrei, Willi·2004·Statistics in Medicine

Abstract

Multivariable prognostic models are widely used in cancer and other disease areas, and have a range of applications in clinical medicine, clinical trials and allocation of health services resources. A well‐founded and reliable measure of the prognostic ability of a model would be valuable to help define the separation between patients or prognostic groups that the model could provide, and to act as a benchmark of model performance in a validation setting. We propose such a measure for models of survival data. Its motivation derives originally from the idea of separation between Kaplan–Meier curves. We define the criteria for a successful measure and discuss them with respect to our approach. Adjustments for ‘optimism’, the tendency for a model to predict better on the data on which it was derived than on new data, are suggested. We study the properties of the measure by simulation and by example in three substantial data sets. We believe that our new measure will prove useful as a tool to evaluate the separation available‐with a prognostic model. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/sim.1621

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Royston and Sauerbrei's D index quantifies prognostic separation of survival curves and is closely related to the standard deviation of the prognostic index.

    “This index quantifies prognostic separation of survival curves and is closely related to the standard deviation of the prognostic index, with Jinks et al. suggesting an equation to convert c values to D values based on empirical evidence25”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Royston, P., & Sauerbrei, W.
Affiliations
  • MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL (GB)
  • University Medical Center Freiburg (DE)
Corresponding author
Royston, Patrick
Venue
Statistics in Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-02-11
Volume
23
Issue
5
Pages
723-748
ISSN
  • 0277-6715 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0258
OpenAlex
W2159966843
Cited by
450
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 25
FWCI
7.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Statistics in Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • FreiDok plus (Universitätsbibliothek Freiburg) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Inference
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Epidemiology
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Probability and Statistical Research
Keywords
survival data, prognostic model, model validation, Kaplan-Meier curves, prognostic ability
MeSH terms
Brain Neoplasms, Breast Neoplasms, Clinical Trials as Topic, Germany, Glioma, Humans, Liver Cirrhosis, Biliary, Prognosis, Models, Statistical, Multicenter Studies as Topic, Multivariate Analysis, Survival Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review