Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 254

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Comparison of baseline and repeated measure covariate techniques in the Framingham heart study

Cupples, L. Adrienne, D'Agostino, Ralph B., Anderson, Keaven, Kannel, William B.·1988·Statistics in Medicine
DOI 10.1002/sim.4780070122
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to indicate how repeated measures on risk factors have been employed in the prediction of the development of disease in the Framingham Heart Study. Since these measures vary over time, the method accounts for time dependent covariates. The technique is a generalized person‐years approach in that it treats each observation interval (of equal length) as a mini‐follow‐up study in which the current risk factor measurements are employed to predict an event in the interval. Observations over multiple intervals are pooled into a single sample to predict the short term risk of an event. This approach is compared to the long‐term prediction of disease which utilizes only the baseline measurements and ignores subsequent repeated measures on the risk factors.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/sim.4780070122

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Cupples, L. A., D'Agostino, R. B., Anderson, K., & Kannel, W. B.
Venue
Statistics in Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1988-01
Volume
7
Issue
1-2
Pages
205-218
ISSN
  • 0277-6715 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0258
DOI
10.1002/sim.4780070122
OpenAlex
W2105028310
Cited by
254
References
0
FWCI
3.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.