Cited by 205Statistical Methods in Clinical TrialsStatistical Methods and Bayesian InferenceReliability and Agreement in Measurement

Mastering variation: Variance components and personalised medicine

Open access
Senn, Stephen·2016·Statistics in Medicine

Abstract

Various sources of variation in observed response in clinical trials and clinical practice are considered, and ways in which the corresponding components of variation might be estimated are discussed. Although the issues have been generally well-covered in the statistical literature, they seem to be poorly understood in the medical literature and even the statistical literature occasionally shows some confusion. To increase understanding and communication, some simple graphical approaches to illustrating issues are proposed. It is also suggested that reducing variation in medical practice might make as big a contribution to improving health outcome as personalising its delivery according to the patient. It is concluded that the common belief that there is a strong personal element in response to treatment is not based on sound statistical evidence.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/sim.6739

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Most randomized clinical trials use a parallel design, assigning each person randomly to a different treatment group, or arm.

    “Most RCTs follow a parallel design, where each individual gets randomly assigned to a different treatment group, called an arm (69).”

    From Methods and challenges for assessing heterogeneity (2020) · cites this paper as [69]

  • More complex RCTs, like repeated cross-over designs, assign patients randomly to different treatments across periods and can measure patient/cluster-treatment interactions.

    “More complex RCTs, such as repeated cross-over designs (69), where patients are randomly assigned to different treatments at different periods throughout the study, can measure patient/cluster-treatment interactions.”

    From Methods and challenges for assessing heterogeneity (2020) · cites this paper as [69]

  • Current tools for the homogeneity assumption might not help with treatment-effect heterogeneity in randomized clinical trials, where several factors can drive variation in treatment response.

    “For example, our current tools to tackle the homogeneity assumption may not help address the treatment-effect het- erogeneity problem (67–69) in research clinical trials (RCTs), where multiple factors may drive treatment-response variation.”

    From Methods and challenges for assessing heterogeneity (2020) · cites this paper as [69]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 55 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [17]Senn SJ. Some controversies in planning and analysing multi‐centre trials. Statistics in Medicine 1998; 17: 1753– 1765; discussion 1799‐1800. 9749445
  2. [36]Cox DR. Interaction. International Statistical Review/Revue Internationale de Statistique 1984; 52: 1– 24.
  3. [48]Goldacre M, Yeates D, Gill L, Hall N, Davidson M. Tonsillectomy in people aged under 15 in England. Unit of Health Care Epidemiology, University of Oxford: Oxford, 2013; 98.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Senn, S.
Affiliations
Luxembourg Institute of Health (LU)
Corresponding author
Senn, Stephen
Venue
Statistics in Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-09-28
Volume
35
Issue
7
Pages
966-977
ISSN
  • 0277-6715 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0258
OpenAlex
W2166770001
Cited by
205
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 4
FWCI
9.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Statistics in Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
European Union FP7 programme (602552)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Reliability and Agreement in Measurement
Keywords
variance components, personalized medicine, sources of variation, clinical trials, clinical practice variation, graphical method, treatment response heterogeneity, health outcomes
MeSH terms
Analysis of Variance, Asthma, Clinical Trials as Topic, Computer Graphics, Computer Simulation, Forced Expiratory Volume, Humans, Tonsillectomy, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Cross-Over Studies, Biostatistics, Precision Medicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review