Cited by 6Body Image and Dysmorphia StudiesHealth Education and ValidationAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMS) for Body Image in Dermatology: A Systematic Review

Open access
Kristensen, Johannes Kjeldstrup, Nielsen, Corina, Haloob, Nora·2022·Skin Health and Disease

Abstract

Introduction: It is widely acknowledged that negative body image perception is linked to anxiety, depression, and body dysmorphic disorder. However, there is no gold standard, body image related patient reported outcome measure in use, specific for dermatologic disease, despite evidence to suggest a high prevalence of mental health problems relating to body image in this group of patients. Aim: The aim of this study was to perform a review of body image Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) used in dermatology and to evaluate their effectiveness. Methods: Searches were performed in the major databases. Two investigators independently performed full text evaluation by applying an established checklist to evaluate the conceptual model, content validity, reliability, construct validity, scoring and interpretability and respondent burden. Results: Six different PROMs were identified of which only one was fully validated. There was a significant lack of patient involvement in the development of PROMs in this context. Conclusions: We therefore encourage further research in this field to improve the quality of evidence to better understand the relationship between mental health and dermatologic disease.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ski2.167

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [11]Thompson AR. Body image issues in dermatology. In: Cash T and Smolak L, editors. Body image. New York: The Guilford Press; 2012, p 323‐ 32, 2nd. ed.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kristensen, J. K., Nielsen, C., & Haloob, N.
Affiliations
  • Hud og Hyperhidrose-klinikken , Copenhagen ,
  • Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust (GB)
Venue
Skin Health and Disease
Published
2022-09-14
Volume
2
Issue
4
Pages
e167-e167
ISSN
2690-442X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4295564130
Cited by
6
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2
FWCI
0.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Skin Health and Disease (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Health Education and Validation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
body image, patient-reported outcome measures, skin diseases, body dysmorphic disorder, mental health, content validity, construct validity, reliability statistics, respondent burden, patient involvement, questionnaire development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review