The DOI matches its Crossref record; 92 of the 97 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Changes in the intellectual structure of strategic management research: a bibliometric study of the Strategic Management Journal , 1980–2000
Abstract
The aim of this paper is to identify the works that have had the greatest impact on strategic management research and to analyze the changes that have taken place in the intellectual structure of this discipline. The methodology is based on the bibliometric techniques of citation and co‐citation analysis which are applied to all the articles published in the Strategic Management Journal from its first issue in 1980 through 2000. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“To preserve search quality and reliability, we focused on peer-reviewed publications. This meant, for example, that we excluded conference proceedings, dissertation abstracts, and unpublished works from our analysis (Calabrò et al., 2019; Nabi et al., 2017; Ramos-Rodríguez et al., 2004; Saggese et al., 2016).”
From Why do users trust algorithms? A review and conceptualization of initial trust and trust over time (2022) · cites this paper as Ramos-Rodríguez et al., 2004
In the citing paper
“The selection of journal articles helps to ensure the reliability and academic nature of the analysis (Ramos-Rodríguez and Ruíz-Navarro 2004) because these resources provide a representative sample of international scientific activity.”
From Blockchain technology in the smart city: A bibliometric review (2022) · cites this paper as Ramos-Rodríguez and Ruíz-Navarro 2004
In the citing paper
“Since Rodriguez and Navarro(2004) categorised articles and reviews as certified knowledge”
From Big Data and supply chain management: A review and bibliometric analysis (2018) · cites this paper as Rodriguez and Navarro(2004)
Citations
Cites
Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/0304-405x(76)90026-x · Cited by 71,491
Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage
Barney, J. (1991) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920639101700108 · Cited by 48,334
Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage
Barney, J. B. (2004) · Advances in strategic management · doi:10.1016/s0742-3322(00)17018-4 · Cited by 38,216
Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation
Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393553 · Cited by 35,728
A resource‐based view of the firm
Wernerfelt, B. (1984) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250050207 · Cited by 25,635
An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change.
Loasby, B. J., Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1983) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/2232409 · Cited by 21,426
External Control of Organizations: Resource Dependence Perspective
Miner, J. B. (2011) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315701967-54 · Cited by 14,229
The Theory of the Growth of the Firm
Penrose, E. T. (1995) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1016/s0024-6301(96)90295-2 · Cited by 13,942
Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications.
O'Brien, D. P., & Williamson, O. E. (1976) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/2230812 · Cited by 13,469
The Core Competence of the Corporation
Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. (2006) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/3-540-30763-x_14 · Cited by 11,436
Research works printed but not linked: 10
- Ansoff HI, 1965, Corporate Strategy
- Bower JL, 1970, Managing the Resource Allocation Process
- Callon M, 1993, Cienciometría. La medición de la actividad científica: de la bibliometría a la vigilancia tecnológica.
- 10.2307/258434 · DOI · Paper page
- Kerlinger FN, 1973, Foundations of Behavioral Research
- 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199009)41:6<433::AID-ASI11>3.0.CO;2-Q · DOI
- Ortega y, 1967, Misión del Bibliotecario
- Porter ME, 1980, Competitive Strategy
- Thompson JD, 1967, Organizations in Action
- Wrigley L, 1970, Divisional autonomy and diversification
Cited by
Sorted by citations
How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines
Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070 · Cited by 14,329
Bibliometric Methods in Management and Organization
Zupic, I., & Čater, T. (2015) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/1094428114562629 · Cited by 7,495
Martín, L. Á. G., & Ronda‐Pupo, G. A. (2016) · Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · doi:10.1057/978-1-349-94848-2_565-1 · Cited by 3,057
Cobo, M. J., López-Herrera, A. G., Herrera‐Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2010) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2010.10.002 · Cited by 3,163
Current trends in Smart City initiatives: Some stylised facts
Neirotti, P., De Marco, A., Cagliano, A. C., Mangano, G., & Scorrano, F. (2014) · Cities · doi:10.1016/j.cities.2013.12.010 · Cited by 2,322
Metadata
- Authors
- Ramos‐Rodríguez, A., & Ruíz‐Navarro, J.
- Affiliations
- Universidad de Cádiz (ES)
- ORCID
- Ruíz‐Navarro, José
- Venue
- Strategic Management Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-08-26
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 981-1004
- ISSN
- 0143-2095 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0266
- OpenAlex
- W2088037265
- Cited by
- 1,626
- References
- 97
- Citations by year
- 2026: 71 · 2025: 130 · 2024: 158 · 2023: 164 · 2022: 168 · 2021: 153 · 2020: 121 · 2019: 80 · 2018: 74 · 2017: 59 · 2016: 60 · 2015: 69 · 2014: 50 · 2013: 47 · 2012: 40
- FWCI
- 18.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Strategic Management Journal (publishedVersion)
- RODIN (Universidad de Cádiz) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Business Strategies and Management Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
- Keywords
- strategic management research, intellectual structure, citation analysis, co-citation analysis, research trends
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
