The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The dominant logic: Retrospective and extension
Abstract
This paper briefly reviews some history of the concept of dominant logic, and then elaborates some of the ways in which the authors have further developed this concept in recent years. Discussion focuses on the dominant logic as a filter, on the dominant logic as a level of strategic analysis, on the unlearning (forgetting) curve, on the dominant logic as an emergent property of organizations as complex adaptive systems, and on the relationship between organizational stability and the dominant logic. Throughout emphasis is given to the inherent nonlinear nature of organizations and the mental models that they create.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Holland, J. H. (1992) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/1090.001.0001 · Cited by 47,002
Organizational learning: The contributing processes and the literatures
Huber, G. P. (1991) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2.1.88 · Cited by 8,072
The Origins of Order: Self-Organization and Selection in Evolution
Kauffman, S. A. (1993) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195079517.001.0001 · Cited by 7,855
Levitt, B., & March, J. G. (1988) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.so.14.080188.001535 · Cited by 6,447
Fiol, C. M., & Lyles, M. A. (1985) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1985.4279103 · Cited by 3,385
The dominant logic: A new linkage between diversity and performance
Prahalad, C. K., & Bettis, R. A. (1986) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250070602 · Cited by 2,856
Self-citationTHE LEARNING CURVE: HISTORICAL REVIEW AND COMPREHENSIVE SURVEY
Yelle, L. E. (1979) · Decision Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.1979.tb00026.x · Cited by 1,541
A TYPOLOGY OF ORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING SYSTEMS
Shrivastava, P. (1983) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.1983.tb00195.x · Cited by 894
To avoid organizational crises, unlearn
Nystrom, P. C., & Starbuck, W. H. (1984) · Organizational Dynamics · doi:10.1016/0090-2616(84)90011-1 · Cited by 816
Gallant, A. R. (1987) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/9780470316719 · Cited by 803
Cited by
Organizing and the process of sensemaking
Weick, K. E., Sutcliffe, K. M., & Obstfeld, D. (2005) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1050.0133 · Cited by 6,943
Product design and business model strategies for a circular economy
Bocken, N. M. P., de Pauw, I., Bakker, C., & van der Grinten, B. (2016) · Journal of Industrial and Production Engineering · doi:10.1080/21681015.2016.1172124 · Cited by 4,002
Business model innovation: Opportunities and barriers
Chesbrough, H. (2010) · Long Range Planning · doi:10.1016/j.lrp.2009.07.010 · Cited by 3,850
Managing Firm Resources in Dynamic Environments to Create Value: Looking Inside the Black Box
Sirmon, D. G., Hitt, M. A., & Ireland, R. D. (2007) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2007.23466005 · Cited by 3,701
EFFECTS OF AGE AT ENTRY , KNOWLEDGE INTENSITY, AND IMITABILITY ON INTERNATIONAL GROWTH.
Autio, E., Sapienza, H. J., & Almeida, J. G. (2000) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/1556419 · Cited by 2,748
Metadata
- Authors
- Bettis, R. A., & Prahalad, C. K.
- Venue
- Strategic Management Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1995-01
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 5-14
- ISSN
- 0143-2095 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0266
- OpenAlex
- W2008445642
- Cited by
- 1,120
- References
- 16
- FWCI
- 18.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The dominant logic: Retrospective and extension. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/smj.4250160104
- The paper
- Bettis, R. A., & Prahalad, C. K. (1995). The dominant logic: Retrospective and extension. Strategic Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250160104
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
