The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Precarious collaboration: Business survival after partners shut down or form new partnerships
Abstract
Businesses often benefit by forming alliances with other firms but risk becoming dependent on their partners. We discuss two situations in which dependence may create serious problems: first, if a partner shuts down and. second, if a partner forms a relationship with a new partner. We examine collaborative relationships formed by businesses operating in the U.S. hospital software systems industry during the 1961–91 period. We find that businesses faced increased risk of dissolution if they did not form new partnerships after partners shut down or formed collaborative relationships with new partners. The results have implications for developing an evolutionary theory of business strategy and performance. Our approach implies that the performance of a focal business often depends on how the strategies of its business partners evolve over time. An evolutionary theory of strategy must incorporate key characteristics of actions and relationships throughout a web of business partnerships. The dual nature of interfirm relationships, which both help a business survive at one time and inhibit its ability to adapt at another, helps explain why so many successful businesses fail when their environments change.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Coase, R. H. (1937) · Economica · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0335.1937.tb00002.x · Cited by 23,972
The Market for "Lemons": Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism
Akerlof, G. A. (1970) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/1879431 · Cited by 23,016
Coase, R. H. (1960) · The Journal of Law and Economics · doi:10.1086/466560 · Cited by 18,255
Burt, R. S. (1992) · doi:10.4159/9780674029095 · Cited by 9,093
Strategic assets and organizational rent
Amit, R., & Schoemaker, P. J. H. (1993) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250140105 · Cited by 8,425
Comparative Economic Organization: The Analysis of Discrete Structural Alternatives
Williamson, O. E. (1991) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393356 · Cited by 7,151
Strategic Factor Markets: Expectations, Luck, and Business Strategy
Barney, J. B. (1986) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.32.10.1231 · Cited by 5,548
Richardson, G. B. (1972) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/2230256 · Cited by 2,200
Cited by
Gulati, R. (1998) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0266(199804)19:4<293::aid-smj982>3.0.co;2-m · Cited by 4,668
Supply chain collaboration: Impact on collaborative advantage and firm performance
Cao, M., & Zhang, Q. (2011) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2010.12.008 · Cited by 2,049
Walking a Tightrope: Creating Value Through Interorganizational Relationships
Barringer, B. R., & Harrison, J. S. (2000) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1016/s0149-2063(00)00046-5 · Cited by 1,369
Gimeno, J. (2004) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/20159625 · Cited by 375
Competitive intensity and collaboration: impact on firm growth across technological environments
Ang, S. H. (2008) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.695 · Cited by 295
Metadata
- Authors
- Singh, K., & Mitchell, W.
- Venue
- Strategic Management Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-07-05
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- S1
- Pages
- 99-115
- ISSN
- 0143-2095 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0266
- OpenAlex
- W2091183408
- Cited by
- 248
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 52.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Precarious collaboration: Business survival after partners shut down or form new partnerships. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/smj.4250171008
- The paper
- Singh, K., & Mitchell, W. (2007). Precarious collaboration: Business survival after partners shut down or form new partnerships. Strategic Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250171008
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.