The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Deregulation, governance structures, and efficiency: the U.S. electric utility sector
Abstract
The business strategy literature offers apparently opposite views of the ability of vertical integration to cope with the uncertainty related to changing regulatory environments. In this paper, we analyze how the process of retail deregulation affects the comparative efficiency of governance structures, which range on a continuum from fully vertically integrated structures to market transactions. Based on the analysis of 177 U.S. electric utilities from 1998 to 2001, our results show that the process of retail deregulation has a negative impact on firms' productive efficiency, as measured using Data Envelopment Analysis. Furthermore, firms that are vertically integrated into electricity generation, or that rely on the market for the supply of their electricity, are more efficient than firms that adopt hybrid structures combining vertical integration and contracting. This research has important implications because it shows the coexistence of different types of governance structures that cope efficiently with regulatory uncertainty through different mechanisms. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples)
SHAPIRO, S. S., & WILK, M. B. (1965) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/52.3-4.591 · Cited by 23,480
Teece, D. J. (1986) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/0048-7333(86)90027-2 · Cited by 7,842
Comparative Economic Organization: The Analysis of Discrete Structural Alternatives
Williamson, O. E. (1991) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393356 · Cited by 7,151
A Suggestion for Using Powerful and Informative Tests of Normality
D'agostino, R. B., Belanger, A., & D'agostino, R. B. (1990) · The American Statistician · doi:10.2307/2684359 · Cited by 1,809
Explaining the Swollen Middle: Why Most Transactions Are a Mix of “Market” and “Hierarchy”
Hennart, J.-F. (1993) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.4.4.529 · Cited by 652
Cited by
Voluntary agreements to improve environmental quality: symbolic and substantive cooperation
Delmas, M. A., & Montes‐Sancho, M. J. (2010) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.826 · Cited by 553
Self-citationCapron, L., & Mitchell, W. (2009) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1070.0328 · Cited by 430
Adopting sustainable innovation: what makes consumers sign up to green electricity?
Ozaki, R. (2011) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.650 · Cited by 422
Enhancing alliance performance: The effects of contractual-based versus relational-based governance
Lee, Y., & Cavusgil, S. T. (2006) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.03.003 · Cited by 396
U.S. state policies for renewable energy: Context and effectiveness
Delmas, M. A., & Montes-Sancho, M. J. (2011) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2011.01.034 · Cited by 364
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Delmas, M., & Tokat, Y.
- Venue
- Strategic Management Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-03-11
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 441-460
- ISSN
- 0143-2095 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0266
- OpenAlex
- W3122913828
- Cited by
- 162
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 13.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Deregulation, governance structures, and efficiency: the U.S. electric utility sector. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/smj.456
- The paper
- Delmas, M., & Tokat, Y. (2005). Deregulation, governance structures, and efficiency: the U.S. electric utility sector. Strategic Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.456
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.