The DOI matches its Crossref record; 59 of the 68 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Network structure and innovation: The leveraging of a dual network as a distinctive relational capability
Open accessAbstract
This paper employs comparative longitudinal case study research to investigate why and how strong dyadic interfirm ties and two alternative network architectures (a ‘strong ties network’ and a ‘dual network’) impact the innovative capability of the lead firm in an alliance network. I answer these intrinsically cross‐level research questions by examining how three design‐intensive furnishings manufacturers managed their networks of joint‐design alliances with consulting industrial design firms over more than 30 years. Initially, in order to explore the sample lead firms' alliance behavior, I advance an operationalization of interorganizational tie strength. Next, I unveil the strengths of strong ties and the weaknesses of a strong ties network. Finally, I show that the ability to integrate a large periphery of heterogeneous weak ties and a core of strong ties is a distinctive lead firm's relational capability, one that provides fertile ground for leading firms in knowledge‐intensive alliance networks to gain competitive advantages whose sustainability is primarily based on the dynamic innovative capability resulting from leveraging a dual network architecture. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“While a GVC can typically be conceptualized as an asymmetrical or high centrality network with a lead firm at its centre (Kano, 2018), these networks can also be heterogeneous in terms of such characteristics as depth, density, openness, and the presence of structural holes (Capaldo, 2007;Rowley, 1997).”
From Global value chains: A review of the multi-disciplinary literature (2020) · cites this paper as Capaldo, 2007
Citations
Cites
Granovetter, M. S. (1973) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/225469 · Cited by 40,491
Rogers, E. M., Singhal, A., & Quinlan, M. M. (2019) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203710753-35 · Cited by 37,670
Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation
Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393553 · Cited by 35,728
Hierarchical Grouping to Optimize an Objective Function
Ward, J. H. (1963) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1963.10500845 · Cited by 21,341
Building Theories from Case Study Research
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258557 · Cited by 17,455
The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Interorganizational Competitive Advantage
Dyer, J. H., & Singh, H. (1998) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1998.1255632 · Cited by 12,810
Social Structure and Competition in Interfirm Networks: The Paradox of Embeddedness
Uzzi, B. (1997) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393808 · Cited by 9,853
Everitt, B. J., Landau, S., & Leese, M. (1974) · Cited by 9,186
Burt, R. S. (1992) · doi:10.4159/9780674029095 · Cited by 9,093
Goodall, C. R., & Jolliffe, I. T. (1988) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1270093 · Cited by 8,797
Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology
Powell, W. W., Koput, K. W., & Smith-Doerr, L. (1996) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393988 · Cited by 8,499
Jolliffe, I. T. (1986) · Springer series in statistics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-1904-8 · Cited by 8,481
Mixing Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: Triangulation in Action.
Jick, T. D. (1979) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392366 · Cited by 7,103 · cited 1×
“Copyright 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Strat. Mgmt. J., 28: 585–608 (2007)”
Collaboration Networks, Structural Holes, and Innovation: A Longitudinal Study
Ahuja, G. (1998) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2667105 · Cited by 5,435
Developmental Processes of Cooperative Interorganizational Relationships
Ring, P. S., & de Ven, A. H. V. (1994) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1994.9410122009 · Cited by 5,028
DOES FAMILIARITY BREED TRUST? THE IMPLICATIONS OF REPEATED TIES FOR CONTRACTUAL CHOICE IN ALLIANCES.
Gulati, R. (1995) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256729 · Cited by 4,945
Zaheer, A., McEvily, B., & Perrone, V. (1998) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.9.2.141 · Cited by 4,179
Social Capital, Networks, and Knowledge Transfer
Inkpen, A. C., & Tsang, E. W. K. (2005) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2005.15281445 · Cited by 3,864
Getting a Job: A Study of Contacts and Careers.
Hallinan, M. T., & Granovetter, M. S. (1975) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2063210 · Cited by 3,702
The use of pledges to build and sustain commitment in distribution channels
Anderson, E., & Weitz, B. (1992) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224379202900103 · Cited by 3,431
The Network Paradigm in Organizational Research: A Review and Typology
Borgatti, S. P., & Foster, P. C. (2003) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1016/s0149-2063(03)00087-4 · Cited by 3,236
A General Theory of Network Governance: Exchange Conditions and Social Mechanisms
Jones, C., Hesterly, W. S., & Borgatti, S. P. (1997) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1997.9711022109 · Cited by 2,739
Network Dyads in Entrepreneurial Settings: A Study of the Governance of Exchange Relationships
Larson, A. (1992) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393534 · Cited by 2,658
TAKING STOCK OF NETWORKS AND ORGANIZATIONS: A MULTILEVEL PERSPECTIVE.
Brass, D. J., Galaskiewicz, J. J., Greve, H. R., & Tsai, W. (2004) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/20159624 · Cited by 2,611
Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition
Reingen, P. H., & Burt, R. S. (1994) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.2307/1252259 · Cited by 2,412
The evolution of cooperation in strategic alliances: Initial conditions or learning processes?
Doz, Y. (2007) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250171006 · Cited by 2,256
Provan, K. G., & Milward, H. B. (1995) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393698 · Cited by 1,925
A Knowledge Accessing Theory of Strategic Alliances
Grant, R. M., & Baden‐Fuller, C. W. F. (2003) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2004.00421.x · Cited by 1,822
Benefiting from network position: firm capabilities, structural holes, and performance
Zaheer, A., & Bell, G. G. (2005) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.482 · Cited by 1,567
Miller, D., & Shamsie, J. (1996) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256654 · Cited by 1,565
SPECIALIZED SUPPLIER NETWORKS AS A SOURCE OF COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: EVIDENCE FROM THE AUTO INDUSTRY
Dyer, J. H. (1996) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0266(199604)17:4 · Cited by 1,506
Rao, H. (1994) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250150904 · Cited by 1,500
What is a processual analysis?
Pettigrew, A. (1997) · Scandinavian Journal of Management · doi:10.1016/s0956-5221(97)00020-1 · Cited by 1,478
Zajac, E. J., & Olsen, C. P. (1993) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.1993.tb00298.x · Cited by 1,191
Interfirm cooperation and startup innovation in the biotechnology industry
Shan, W., Walker, G., & Kogut, B. (1994) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250150505 · Cited by 1,166
Dyer, J. H., & Hatch, N. W. (2006) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.543 · Cited by 1,044
Rindfleisch, A., & Moorman, C. (2001) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.65.2.1.18253 · Cited by 1,041
THE IMPORTANCE OF COLLABORATIVE KNOW-HOW: AN EMPIRICAL TEST OF THE LEARNING ORGANIZATION.
Simonin, B. L. (1997) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/256930 · Cited by 1,013
Top management team diversity, group process, and strategic consensus
Knight, D., Pearce, C. L., Smith, K. G., Olian, J. D., Sims, H. P., Smith, K. A., & Flood, P. C. (1999) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0266(199905)20:5 · Cited by 918
Network Learning: The Effects of Partners' Heterogeneity of Experience on Corporate Acquisitions
Beckman, C. M., & Haunschild, P. R. (2002) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3094892 · Cited by 893
LEARNING BY ASSOCIATION? INTERORGANIZATIONAL NETWORKS AND ADAPTATION TO ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE.
Kraatz, M. S. (1998) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256961 · Cited by 874
Global strategic linkages and industry structure
Nohria, N., & Garcia‐Pont, C. (1991) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250120909 · Cited by 713
Creating a Strategic Center to Manage a Web of Partners
Lorenzoni, G. G., & Baden‐Fuller, C. W. F. (1995) · California Management Review · doi:10.2307/41165803 · Cited by 619
Procedural justice, strategic decision making, and the knowledge economy
Kim, W. C., & Mauborgne, R. A. (1998) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0266(199804)19:4 · Cited by 576
Alliance Constellations: A Social Exchange Perspective
Das, T. K., & Teng, B. (2002) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2002.7389937 · Cited by 559
THE STRENGTH OF STRONG TIES: SOCIAL NETWORKS AND INTERGROUP CONFLICT IN ORGANIZATIONS.
Nelson, R. E. (1989) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256367 · Cited by 514
The alliance revolution: the new shape of business rivalry
(1996) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.34-2251 · Cited by 508
AN EMERGENT THEORY OF STRUCTURE AND OUTCOMES IN SMALL-FIRM STRATEGIC MANUFACTURING NETWORKS.
Human, S. E., & Provan, K. G. (1997) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/256887 · Cited by 432
Gimeno, J. (2004) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/20159625 · Cited by 372
Trust in Japanese Interfirm Relations: Institutional Sanctions Matter
Hagen, J. M., & Choe, S. (1998) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1998.926628 · Cited by 332
A test of structural features of granovetter's strength of weak ties theory
Friedkin, N. E. (1980) · Social Networks · doi:10.1016/0378-8733(80)90006-4 · Cited by 299
THE EFFECTS OF CORPORATE RESTRUCTURING ON AGGREGATE INDUSTRY SPECIALIZATION
Hatfield, D. E., Liebeskind, J. P., & Opler, T. C. (1996) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0266(199601)17:1 · Cited by 252
Similarities and contradictions in the core logic of three strategy research streams
Lengnick‐Hall, C. A., & Wolff, J. A. (1999) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0266(199912)20:12 · Cited by 223
Sobrero, M., & Roberts, E. B. (2001) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.47.4.493.9828 · Cited by 204
Keister, L. A. (1999) · The International Journal of Organizational Analysis · doi:10.1108/eb028892 · Cited by 21
The economic significance of industrial design awards: A conceptual framework
Gemser, G., & Wijnberg, N. M. (2002) · Academic Review · doi:10.1111/j.1948-7177.2002.tb00012.x · Cited by 21
Economic exposure and integrated risk management
Miller, K. D. (1998) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0266(199805)19:5
Baum (2000) · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0266(200003)21:3
Flagged first, then by citations
9 of the 68 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 23
- 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200003)21:3<267::AID-SMJ89>3.0.CO;2-8 · DOI
- Blankenburg Holm D, 1999, Creating value through mutual commitment to business network relationships, Strategic Management Journal, 20, 467
- Bouroche JM, 1983, L'analyse des Données
- 10.2307/4134389 · DOI
- 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200003)21:3<345::AID-SMJ96>3.0.CO;2-N · DOI
- 10.2307/259056 · DOI
- Good D, 1988, Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations, 31
- Granovetter M, 1982, Social Structure and Network Analysis, 105
- 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200003)21:3<203::AID-SMJ102>3.0.CO;2-K · DOI
- 10.2307/259296 · DOI
- Hampel FR, 1986, Robust Statistics: The Approach Based on Influence Functions
- Harary F, 1965, Structural Models
- 10.2307/256887 · DOI
- 10.2307/259249 · DOI
- 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200003)21:3<217::AID-SMJ95>3.0.CO;2-Y · DOI
- Krackhardt D, 1992, Networks and Organizations, 216
- MacQueen J, 1967, Proceedings of the Fifth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, 281
- 10.2307/258836 · DOI
- Rogers E, 2003, Diffusion of Innovations
- Rousseau DM, 1985, Research in Organizational Behavior, 1
- 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200003)21:3<369::AID-SMJ93>3.0.CO;2-M · DOI
- 10.2307/256930 · DOI
- Yin K, 1994, Case Study Research
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Managing for stakeholders, stakeholder utility functions, and competitive advantage
Harrison, J. S., Bosse, D. A., & Phillips, R. A. (2009) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.801 · Cited by 1,348
“Firms that manage for stakeholders are in a favorable position to manage the flow of this sort of information because stakeholders are more likely to trust that such a firm will act responsibly with regard to their own interests (Capaldo, 2007).”
BackgroundThe dark side of buyer–supplier relationships: A social capital perspective⋆
Villena, V. H., Revilla, E., & Choi, T. Y. (2011) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2010.09.001 · Cited by 1,018
“Further, previous studies have limited the analysis of social capital to its relational dimension (Cousins et al., 2006; Johnston et al., 2004), structural dimension (Capaldo, 2007), or a combination of the two (Autry and Griffis, 2008; Lawson et al., 2008).”
BackgroundGlobal value chains: A review of the multi-disciplinary literature
Kano, L., Tsang, E. W. K., & Yeung, H. W.-C. (2020) · Journal of International Business Studies · doi:10.1057/s41267-020-00304-2 · Cited by 767
“…a GVC can typically be conceptualized as an asymmetrical or high centrality network with a lead firm at its centre (Kano, 2018), these networks can also be heterogeneous in terms of such characteristics as depth, density, openness, and the presence of structural holes (Capaldo, 2007; Rowley, 1997).”
BackgroundAlliance Portfolios: A Review and Research Agenda
Wassmer, U. (2010) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206308328484 · Cited by 511
“…strong dyadic ties can affect a focal firm’s innovative capabilities positively if they are trust based, knowledge intensive, and reinforced through the development of social content between alliance partners, relationship-specific investments, and the deepening of mutual knowledge (Capaldo, 2007).”
BackgroundGölgeci̇, İ., & Kuivalainen, O. (2019) · Industrial Marketing Management · doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2019.05.006 · Cited by 535
“Having interorganizational ties with firms operating within supply chains is important but so is having intersectional ties (ties across sectors) (Capaldo, 2007).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Capaldo, A.
- Affiliations
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Capaldo, Antonio
- ORCID
- Capaldo, Antonio
- Venue
- Strategic Management Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-03-07
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 585-608
- ISSN
- 0143-2095 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0266
- OpenAlex
- W2004383939
- Cited by
- 986
- References
- 68
- Citations by year
- 2026: 26 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 46 · 2021: 81 · 2020: 95 · 2019: 65 · 2018: 60 · 2017: 65 · 2016: 59 · 2015: 70 · 2014: 64 · 2013: 62 · 2012: 58
- FWCI
- 79.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- core.ac.uk
- Locations
- Strategic Management Journal (publishedVersion)
- SSRN Electronic Journal (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Business Strategy and Innovation
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
- Keywords
- inter-firm networks, network architecture, dual network, strong ties, weak ties, relational capabilities, innovation ability, alliance networks, competitive advantage
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review