Cited by 2,658Business Strategy and InnovationInnovation and Knowledge ManagementEntrepreneurship Studies and Influences

Network Dyads in Entrepreneurial Settings: A Study of the Governance of Exchange Relationships

Open access
Larson, Andrea·1992·Administrative Science Quarterly

Abstract

Investigates network dyads and the manner in which control is exercised in these structures. Four entrepreneurial, high growth firms, each from a different industry, were selected to participate in this ethnographic analysis. The represented industries are telephone equipment, clothing, computer hardware, and environmental support systems. Seven network dyads were identified for the four firms considered. The partnerships were typically other members of the value chain - e.g., suppliers, distributors and final customers. The analysis identified three phases for the network dyad development: preconditions for exchange, conditions to build, and integration and control. The first phase, preconditions, utilized prior relations in addition to personal and firm reputations to reduce uncertainty and establish expectations and obligation. The second phase, the building process, has significant reliance on the trust and the development of reciprocity norms. The third phase is marked by three forms of integration: operational, strategic, and social control. Examination of the four firms and their seven dyadic relationships support the model. These firms were found to be engaged in stable, sustained relationships with a high degree of cooperation and collaboration. The mode of exchange found in these dyadic relationships is characterized as a network form of governance, which appears to be beneficial to high growth firms. Further research using this model could be done for R&D partnersh…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2393534

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The evidence and analysis unpacked the meaning of small-business external stakeholder relationships, grounded in the actors' perspectives, and is complementary and additive to the few other empirical sociological analyses of this issue.

    “The evidence and analysis above has unpacked the meaning of small-business external stakeholder relationships, definitively grounded in the actors' perspectives, and is complementary and additive to the few other empirical sociological analyses of this issue, for example (Burrows and Curran, 1989;Curran and Blackburn, 1994;Larson, 1992).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Larson, A.
Affiliations
University of Virginia (US)
Corresponding author
Larson, Andrea
Venue
Administrative Science Quarterly
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1992-03
Volume
37
Issue
1
Pages
76
ISSN
0001-8392 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2038817869
Cited by
2,658
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 61 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 73 · 2020: 71 · 2019: 68 · 2018: 74 · 2017: 98 · 2016: 108 · 2015: 145 · 2014: 142 · 2013: 149 · 2012: 161
FWCI
74.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Administrative Science Quarterly (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Business Strategy and Innovation
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
Keywords
exchange relationships, network governance, high-growth firms, value chain partnerships, trust, reciprocity norms, relationship control, strategic alliances, inter-firm cooperation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review