Network Dyads in Entrepreneurial Settings: A Study of the Governance of Exchange Relationships
Open accessAbstract
Investigates network dyads and the manner in which control is exercised in these structures. Four entrepreneurial, high growth firms, each from a different industry, were selected to participate in this ethnographic analysis. The represented industries are telephone equipment, clothing, computer hardware, and environmental support systems. Seven network dyads were identified for the four firms considered. The partnerships were typically other members of the value chain - e.g., suppliers, distributors and final customers. The analysis identified three phases for the network dyad development: preconditions for exchange, conditions to build, and integration and control. The first phase, preconditions, utilized prior relations in addition to personal and firm reputations to reduce uncertainty and establish expectations and obligation. The second phase, the building process, has significant reliance on the trust and the development of reciprocity norms. The third phase is marked by three forms of integration: operational, strategic, and social control. Examination of the four firms and their seven dyadic relationships support the model. These firms were found to be engaged in stable, sustained relationships with a high degree of cooperation and collaboration. The mode of exchange found in these dyadic relationships is characterized as a network form of governance, which appears to be beneficial to high growth firms. Further research using this model could be done for R&D partnersh…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The evidence and analysis unpacked the meaning of small-business external stakeholder relationships, grounded in the actors' perspectives, and is complementary and additive to the few other empirical sociological analyses of this issue.
“The evidence and analysis above has unpacked the meaning of small-business external stakeholder relationships, definitively grounded in the actors' perspectives, and is complementary and additive to the few other empirical sociological analyses of this issue, for example (Burrows and Curran, 1989;Curran and Blackburn, 1994;Larson, 1992).”
From ‘Relationships Mean Everything’; A Typology of Small–Business Relationship Strategies in a Reflexive Context (2002) · cites this paper as Larson, 1992
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Affect and Cognition Based Trust as Foundations for Interpersonal Cooperation in Organizations
McAllister, D. J. (1995) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256727 · Cited by 7,346 · see citing works
Modes of Network Governance: Structure, Management, and Effectiveness
Provan, K. G., & Kenis, P. (2007) · Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory · doi:10.1093/jopart/mum015 · Cited by 4,006 · see citing works
Social Capital, Networks, and Knowledge Transfer
Inkpen, A. C., & Tsang, E. W. K. (2005) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2005.15281445 · Cited by 3,864 · see citing works
Network-based research in entrepreneurship
Hoang, H., & Antoncic, B. (2003) · Journal of Business Venturing · doi:10.1016/s0883-9026(02)00081-2 · Cited by 2,302 · see citing works
Investments in Consumer Relationships: A Cross-Country and Cross-Industry Exploration
De Wulf, K., Odekerken-Schröder, G., & Iacobucci, D. (2001) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.65.4.33.18386 · Cited by 2,083 · see citing works
Phillips McDougall, P., Shane, S., & Oviatt, B. M. (1994) · Journal of Business Venturing · doi:10.1016/0883-9026(94)90017-5 · Cited by 1,691 · see citing works
Capaldo, A. (2007) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.621 · Cited by 986 · see citing works
Stakeholders, reciprocity, and firm performance
Bosse, D. A., Phillips, R. A., & Harrison, J. S. (2009) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.743 · Cited by 558 · see citing works
First mover advantages in international business and firm-specific political resources
Frynas, J. G., Mellahi, K., & Pigman, G. A. (2006) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.519 · Cited by 419 · see citing works
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINANTS AND INDIVIDUAL-LEVEL MODERATORS OF ALLIANCE USE.
DICKSON, P. H., & WEAVER, K. M. (1997) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256888 · Cited by 381 · see citing works
Molm, L. D., Schaefer, D. R., & Collett, J. L. (2007) · Social Psychology Quarterly · doi:10.1177/019027250707000208 · Cited by 283 · see citing works
Better with Age? Tie Longevity and the Performance Implications of Bridging and Closure
Baum, J. A. C., McEvily, B., & Rowley, T. J. (2012) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1100.0566 · Cited by 133 · see citing works
Asthma and psychological dysfunction
Thomas, M., Bruton, A., Moffatt, M., & Cleland, J. (2011) · Primary Care Respiratory Journal · doi:10.4104/pcrj.2011.00058 · Cited by 120 · see citing works
The Alliances of Spin-Offs Versus Start-Ups: Social Ties in the Genesis of Post-Soviet Alliances
Sedaitis, J. (1998) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.9.3.368 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Fuller, T., & Lewis, J. (2002) · British Journal of Management · doi:10.1111/1467-8551.00249 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
- Authors
- Larson, A.
- Affiliations
- University of Virginia (US)
- Corresponding author
- Larson, Andrea
- ORCID
- Larson, Andrea
- Venue
- Administrative Science Quarterly
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1992-03
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 76
- ISSN
- 0001-8392 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2038817869
- Cited by
- 2,658
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 61 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 73 · 2020: 71 · 2019: 68 · 2018: 74 · 2017: 98 · 2016: 108 · 2015: 145 · 2014: 142 · 2013: 149 · 2012: 161
- FWCI
- 74.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- papers.ssrn.com
- Locations
- Administrative Science Quarterly (publishedVersion)
- SSRN Electronic Journal (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Business Strategy and Innovation
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
- Keywords
- exchange relationships, network governance, high-growth firms, value chain partnerships, trust, reciprocity norms, relationship control, strategic alliances, inter-firm cooperation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review