The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Convolutional neural network-based data anomaly detection method using multiple information for structural health monitoring
Open accessAbstract
Structural health monitoring (SHM) is used worldwide for managing and maintaining civil infrastructures. SHM systems have produced huge amounts of data, but the effective monitoring, mining, and utilization of this data still need in-depth study. SHM data generally includes multiple types of anomalies caused by sensor faults or system malfunctions that can disturb structural analysis and assessment. In the routine data pre-processing, multiple signal processing techniques are required to detect the anomalies, respectively, which is inefficient. The large variations of extracted features from massive SHM data make the data anomaly detection techniques prone to be over-processed or under-processed. Even with expert intervention, the parameter tuning, associated with multiple data preprocessing methods, is still a challenge, making the procedure expensive and inefficient. In addition, one data anomaly detection technique frequently mis-detects other types of anomaly. In this work, we focus on the anomaly detection in the stage of data pre-processing that little work has been done based on the real-world continuous SHM data with multiclass anomalies. We proposed a novel data anomaly detection method based on a convolutional neural network (CNN) that imitates human vision and decision making. First, we split raw time series data into sections, and visualized the data in time and frequency domain, respectively. Then each section's images were stacked as a single dual-channel image and labeled according to graphical features (multi-2D image space expression). Second, a CNN was designed and trained for data anomaly classification, during which the descriptions and representations of the anomalies' features were learned by convolution. To validate our work, we considered the effects of balanced and imbalanced training sets and training ratios on actual acceleration data from an SHM system for a long-span cable-stayed bridge. The results show that our method could detect the multipattern anomalies of SHM data efficiently with high accuracy. The proposed dual-information CNN-based design makes this detection process readily scalable, faster, and more accurate, thereby providing a novel perspective with strong potential for SHM data preprocessing.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Densely Connected Convolutional Networks
Huang, G., Liu, Z., Van Der Maaten, L., & Weinberger, K. Q. (2017) · 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2017.243 · Cited by 48,566
Learning representations by back-propagating errors
Rumelhart, D. E., Hinton, G. E., & Williams, R. J. (1986) · Nature · doi:10.1038/323533a0 · Cited by 31,892
What is the best multi-stage architecture for object recognition?
Jarrett, K., Kavukcuoglu, K., Ranzato, M. A., & LeCun, Y. (2009) · 2009 IEEE 12th International Conference on Computer Vision · doi:10.1109/iccv.2009.5459469 · Cited by 2,153
Convolutional, Long Short-Term Memory, fully connected Deep Neural Networks
Sainath, T. N., Vinyals, O., Senior, A., & Sak, H. (2015) · 2015 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP) · doi:10.1109/icassp.2015.7178838 · Cited by 1,678
Cha, Y., Choi, W., Suh, G., Mahmoudkhani, S., & Büyüköztürk, O. (2018) · Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering · doi:10.1111/mice.12334 · Cited by 1,558
Cited by
Azimi, M., Eslamlou, A., & Pekcan, G. (2020) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s20102778 · Cited by 769
Himeur, Y., Ghanem, K., Alsalemi, A., Bensaali, F., & Amira, A. (2021) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.116601 · Cited by 660
Machine learning paradigm for structural health monitoring
Bao, Y., & Li, H. (2021) · Structural Health Monitoring · doi:10.1177/1475921720972416 · Cited by 373
Self-citationDeep learning for data anomaly detection and data compression of a long‐span suspension bridge
Ni, F., Zhang, J., & Noori, M. N. (2020) · Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering · doi:10.1111/mice.12528 · Cited by 264
Lei, X., Sun, L., & Xia, Y. (2021) · Structural Health Monitoring · doi:10.1177/1475921720959226 · Cited by 236
Metadata
- Authors
- Tang, Z., Chen, Z., Bao, Y., & Li, H.
- Venue
- Structural Control and Health Monitoring
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2018-11-29
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- e2296
- ISSN
- 1545-2255 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2902164950
- Cited by
- 436
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 19.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.