Cited by 603Science Education and PedagogyEducational Assessment and PedagogyInnovative Teaching and Learning Methods

Teacher questioning in science classrooms: Approaches that stimulate productive thinking

Chin, Christine·2007·Journal of Research in Science Teaching

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to find out how teachers use questions in classroom discourse to scaffold student thinking and help students construct scientific knowledge. The study was conducted in large‐class settings where the medium of instruction was English although the students were non‐native speakers of the language. Six teachers teaching grade 7 science classes from four schools participated in the study. Thirty‐six lessons covering a range of topics were observed across a variety of lesson structures such as expository teaching, whole‐class discussions, and laboratory work. The lessons were audiotaped and videotaped. Verbal transcripts of classroom discourse were analyzed interpretively. Particular attention was paid to questioning exchanges that stimulated productive thinking in students, as manifested by their verbal responses. A framework was developed that included four questioning approaches adopted by the teachers. This included Socratic questioning, verbal jigsaw, semantic tapestry, and framing. This paper describes these various questioning approaches, their features, and the conditions under which they were used. It also discusses the implications of these approaches for instructional practice. The findings from this study have potential in translating research insights into practical advice for teachers regarding tactical moves in classroom discourse, and provide guidelines for teachers to increase their repertoire of questioning skills. © 2007 Wiley Perio…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/tea.20171

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chin, C.
Affiliations
Nanyang Technological University (SG)
Corresponding author
Chin, Christine
Venue
Journal of Research in Science Teaching
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-01-03
Volume
44
Issue
6
Pages
815-843
ISSN
  • 0022-4308 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-2736
OpenAlex
W1965442895
Cited by
603
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 34 · 2025: 46 · 2024: 46 · 2023: 54 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 56 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 45 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 21
FWCI
48.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Research in Science Teaching (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Assessment and Pedagogy
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
Keywords
teacher questioning, classroom discourse, scientific knowledge construction, Socratic questioning, framing, non-native speakers, grade 7 science, questioning strategies, whole-class discussion, laboratory work

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review