The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effects of experimenting with physical and virtual manipulatives on students' conceptual understanding in heat and temperature
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate the comparative value of experimenting with physical manipulatives (PM) in a sequential combination with virtual manipulatives (VM), with the use of PM preceding the use of VM, and of experimenting with PM alone, with respect to changes in students' conceptual understanding in the domain of heat and temperature. A pre–post‐comparison study design was used which involved 62 undergraduate students that attended an introductory course in physics. The participants were randomly assigned to one experimental and one control group. Both groups used the same inquiry‐oriented curriculum materials. Participants in the control group used PM to conduct the experiments, whereas, participants in the experimental group used first PM and then VM. VM differed from PM in that it could provide the possibility of faster manipulation, whereas, it retained any other features and interactions of the study's subject domain identical to the PM condition. Conceptual tests were administered to assess students' understanding before, during, and after the study's treatments. Results indicated that experimenting with the combination of PM and VM enhanced students' conceptual understanding more than experimenting with PM alone. The use of VM was identified as the cause of this differentiation. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Res Sci Teach 45: 1021–1035, 2008
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
White, R., & Gunstone, R. (2014) · doi:10.4324/9780203761342 · Cited by 894
Critical distinctions among three approaches to peer education
Damon, W., & Phelps, E. (1989) · International Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1016/0883-0355(89)90013-x · Cited by 538
Concrete Manipulatives, Concrete Ideas
Clements, D. H. (2000) · Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood · doi:10.2304/ciec.2000.1.1.7 · Cited by 282
Learning and Instruction with Computer Simulations: Learning Processes Involved
de Jong, T., & Njoo, M. (1992) · Computer-Based Learning Environments and Problem Solving · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-77228-3_19 · Cited by 125
Cited by
Physical and Virtual Laboratories in Science and Engineering Education
de Jong, T., Linn, M. C., & Zacharia, Z. C. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1230579 · Cited by 1,083
Self-citationSmetana, L. K., & Bell, R. L. (2012) · International Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/09500693.2011.605182 · Cited by 702
Conditions for the Effectiveness of Multiple Visual Representations in Enhancing STEM Learning
Rau, M. A. (2017) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-016-9365-3 · Cited by 281
Improving biotech education through gamified laboratory simulations
Bonde, M. T., Makransky, G., Wandall, J., Larsen, M. V., Morsing, M., Jarmer, H., & Sommer, M. O. A. (2014) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2955 · Cited by 243
Olympiou, G., Zacharias, Z., & deJong, T. (2013) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-012-9245-2 · Cited by 132
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Zacharia, Z. C., Olympiou, G., & Papaevripidou, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Research in Science Teaching
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-10-02
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1021-1035
- ISSN
- 0022-4308 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-2736
- OpenAlex
- W2054938875
- Cited by
- 225
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 35.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of experimenting with physical and virtual manipulatives on students' conceptual understanding in heat and temperature. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/tea.20260
- The paper
- Zacharia, Z. C., Olympiou, G., & Papaevripidou, M. (2008). Effects of experimenting with physical and virtual manipulatives on students' conceptual understanding in heat and temperature. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20260
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.