Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 175

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Advanced maturation by electrical stimulation: Differences in response between C2C12 and primary muscle progenitor cells

Open access
Langelaan, Marloes L. P., Boonen, Kristel J. M., Rosaria-Chak, Kang Yuen, van der Schaft, Daisy W. J., Post, Mark J., Baaijens, Frank P. T.·2011·Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine

Abstract

Skeletal muscle tissue engineering still does not result in the desired functional properties and texture as preferred for regenerative medicine and meat production applications. Electrical stimulation has been appropriately used as a tool to advance muscle cell maturation in vitro, thereby simulating nerve stimulation, as part of the muscle cell niche in vivo. We first investigated the effects of electrical stimulation protocols in two-dimensional (2D) monolayers of C2C12 and translated these protocols to a three-dimensional (3D) model system, based on a collagen type I/Matrigel(™) hydrogel. More importantly, we addressed the ongoing debate of the translation of results found in cell lines (C2C12) to a primary cell source [muscle progenitor cells (MPCs)] in our 3D system. Striking differences in maturation level were found between the different cell sources. Constructs with MPCs were much more mature than C2C12 constructs, based on developed cross-striations and expression levels of mature myosin heavy chain (MHC) isoforms. Overall, electrical stimulation, when optimally timed, accelerated sarcomere assembly in both 2D and 3D. In addition, MPC constructs were more susceptible to the electrical stimulus, resulting in a shift of MHC expression to slower isoforms.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/term.345

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 175

Metadata

Authors
Langelaan, M. L. P., Boonen, K. J. M., Rosaria-Chak, K. Y., van der Schaft, D. W. J., Post, M. J., & Baaijens, F. P. T.
Venue
Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
Published
2010-12-09
Volume
5
Issue
7
Pages
529-539
ISSN
1932-6254 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2080039251
Cited by
175
References
2
FWCI
3.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.