The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Advanced maturation by electrical stimulation: Differences in response between C2C12 and primary muscle progenitor cells
Open accessAbstract
Skeletal muscle tissue engineering still does not result in the desired functional properties and texture as preferred for regenerative medicine and meat production applications. Electrical stimulation has been appropriately used as a tool to advance muscle cell maturation in vitro, thereby simulating nerve stimulation, as part of the muscle cell niche in vivo. We first investigated the effects of electrical stimulation protocols in two-dimensional (2D) monolayers of C2C12 and translated these protocols to a three-dimensional (3D) model system, based on a collagen type I/Matrigel(™) hydrogel. More importantly, we addressed the ongoing debate of the translation of results found in cell lines (C2C12) to a primary cell source [muscle progenitor cells (MPCs)] in our 3D system. Striking differences in maturation level were found between the different cell sources. Constructs with MPCs were much more mature than C2C12 constructs, based on developed cross-striations and expression levels of mature myosin heavy chain (MHC) isoforms. Overall, electrical stimulation, when optimally timed, accelerated sarcomere assembly in both 2D and 3D. In addition, MPC constructs were more susceptible to the electrical stimulus, resulting in a shift of MHC expression to slower isoforms.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Myotubes differentiate optimally on substrates with tissue-like stiffness
Engler, A. J., Griffin, M. A., Sen, S., Bönnemann, C. G., Sweeney, H. L., & Discher, D. E. (2004) · The Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.200405004 · Cited by 1,743
Collins, C. A., Olsen, I., Zammit, P. S., Heslop, L., Petrie, A., Partridge, T. A., & Morgan, J. E. (2005) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2005.05.010 · Cited by 1,445
Cited by
Stephens, N., Di Silvio, L., Dunsford, I., Ellis, M., Glencross, A., & Sexton, A. (2018) · Trends in Food Science & Technology · doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2018.04.010 · Cited by 768
Engineered In Vitro Disease Models
Benam, K. H., Dauth, S., Hassell, B., Herland, A., Jain, A., Jang, K.-J., Karalis, K., Kim, H. J., MacQueen, L., Mahmoodian, R., et al. (2015) · Annual Review of Pathology: Mechanisms of Disease · doi:10.1146/annurev-pathol-012414-040418 · Cited by 554
Cultured beef: medical technology to produce food
Post, M. J. (2014) · Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture · doi:10.1002/jsfa.6474 · Cited by 377
Self-citationLipid modulation of skeletal muscle mass and function
Lipina, C., & Hundal, H. S. (2017) · Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle · doi:10.1002/jcsm.12144 · Cited by 247
Biomimetic 3D tissue models for advanced high-throughput drug screening
Nam, K.-H., Smith, A. S. T., Lone, S., Kwon, S., & Kim, D.-H. (2015) · SLAS Technology · doi:10.1177/2211068214557813 · Cited by 171
Metadata
- Authors
- Langelaan, M. L. P., Boonen, K. J. M., Rosaria-Chak, K. Y., van der Schaft, D. W. J., Post, M. J., & Baaijens, F. P. T.
- Venue
- Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
- Publisher
- Hindawi Limited
- Published
- 2010-12-09
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 529-539
- ISSN
- 1932-6254 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2080039251
- Cited by
- 175
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 3.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.