Cited by 21Palliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchGeriatric Care and Nursing Homes

Practices, challenges, and opportunities when addressing the palliative care needs of people living with dementia: Specialty memory care provider perspectives

Open access
Bernstein Sideman, Alissa, Harrison, Krista L., Garrett, Sarah B., Naasan, Georges, Dementia Palliative Care Writing Group, Ritchie, Christine S.·2021·Alzheimer's & Dementia: Translational Research & Clinical Interventions

Abstract

Introduction: Palliative care focuses on reducing suffering and improving quality of life for individuals with serious illness and their families. In an effort to develop palliative care interventions for specialty memory care clinics, this study characterizes memory care providers’ perspectives on addressing palliative care needs of people living with dementia (PLWD). Methods: Qualitative interviews with specialty memory care providers were followed by thematic analysis by a multidisciplinary research team. Results: Provider approaches overlap with key domains of palliative care. Approaches unique to dementia include having a detailed understanding of dementia syndromes, behavioral symptoms, and caregiver burden. Challenges were identified related to disease progression, provider‐level factors, and systems and cultural issues. Respondents identified training needed to strengthen a palliative care approach. Discussion: There are many strengths of using memory care teams to address palliative care needs of PLWD. However, they may require additional knowledge and training to strengthen their work.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/trc2.12144

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Physicians at a memory care clinic endorsed that patients and family often have questions about care setting decisions, yet no protocols exist to help physicians anticipate and address these concerns.

    “Physicians at a memory care clinic similarly endorsed that patients and family often have questions about care setting decisions, 18 yet no protocols exist to help physicians anticipate and address these concerns.”
  • Even dementia experts identify challenges in communicating about difficult topics, including diagnostic disclosure and prognosis, and worry about disrupting their relationship with the patient and caregivers.

    “Even dementia experts identify challenges in communicating about difficult topics, including diagnostic disclosure and prognosis, [33][34][35] and worry about disrupting their relationship with the patient and caregivers.18”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 46 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [47]Palliative care for dementia—time to think again? https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3665910/. Accessed July 17, 2020.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bernstein Sideman, A., Harrison, K. L., Garrett, S. B., Naasan, G., Dementia Palliative Care Writing Group, & Ritchie, C. S.
Affiliations
  • Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies University of California, San Francisco San Francisco California USA
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Venue
Alzheimer's & Dementia: Translational Research & Clinical Interventions
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-01
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
e12144-e12144
ISSN
2352-8737 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3160119700
Cited by
21
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 1
FWCI
3.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Alzheimer s & Dementia Translational Research & Clinical Interventions (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • Global Brain Health Institute
  • National Institute on Aging (K01AG059840, K01AG059831, P30AG044280)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (KL2TR001870)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
Keywords
palliative care, dementia, provider perspectives, behavioral symptoms of dementia, caregiver burden, disease progression, palliative care education, quality of life, end-of-life care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review