Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 391

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 82 of the 82 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Prevention of perinatal death and adverse perinatal outcome using low‐dose aspirin: a meta‐analysis

Roberge, S., Nicolaides, K. H., Demers, S., Villa, P., Bujold, E.·2013·Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology

Abstract

Objective: To compare early vs late administration of low‐dose aspirin on the risk of perinatal death and adverse perinatal outcome. Methods: Databases were searched for keywords related to aspirin and pregnancy. Only randomized controlled trials that evaluated the prophylactic use of low‐dose aspirin (50–150 mg/day) during pregnancy were included. The primary outcome combined fetal and neonatal death. Pooled relative risks (RR) with their 95% CIs were compared according to gestational age at initiation of low‐dose aspirin (≤ 16 vs > 16 weeks of gestation). Results: Out of 8377 citations, 42 studies (27 222 women) were included. Inclusion criteria were risk factors for pre‐eclampsia, including: nulliparity, multiple pregnancy, chronic hypertension, cardiovascular or endocrine disease, prior gestational hypertension or fetal growth restriction, and/or abnormal uterine artery Doppler. When compared with controls, low‐dose aspirin started at ≤ 16 weeks' gestation compared with low‐dose aspirin started at >16 weeks' gestation was associated with a greater reduction of perinatal death (RR = 0.41 (95% CI, 0.19–0.92) vs 0.93 (95% CI, 0.73–1.19), P = 0.02), pre‐eclampsia (RR = 0.47 (95% CI, 0.36–0.62) vs 0.78 (95% CI, 0.61–0.99), P < 0.01), severe pre‐eclampsia (RR = 0.18 (95% CI, 0.08–0.41) vs 0.65 (95% CI, 0.40–1.07), P < 0.01), fetal growth restriction (RR = 0.46 (95% CI, 0.33–0.64) vs 0.98 (95% CI, 0.88–1.08), P < 0.001) and preterm birth (RR = 0.35 (95% CI, 0.22–0.57) vs 0.90 (95% CI, 0.83–0.97), P < 0.001). Conclusion: Low‐dose aspirin initiated at ≤ 16 weeks of gestation is associated with a greater reduction of perinatal death and other adverse perinatal outcomes than when initiated at >16 weeks. Copyright © 2013 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/uog.12421

Cites

82 of 82 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 82 references

Cited by

See all 391

Metadata

Authors
Roberge, S., Nicolaides, K. H., Demers, S., Villa, P., & Bujold, E.
Venue
Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-04-22
Volume
41
Issue
5
Pages
491-499
ISSN
  • 0960-7692 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-0705
OpenAlex
W2137966156
Cited by
391
References
82
FWCI
48.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prevention of perinatal death and adverse perinatal outcome using low‐dose aspirin: a meta‐analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/uog.12421
The paper
Roberge, S., Nicolaides, K. H., Demers, S., Villa, P., & Bujold, E. (2013). Prevention of perinatal death and adverse perinatal outcome using low‐dose aspirin: a meta‐analysis. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.12421

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.