Cited by 85Neonatal Respiratory Health ResearchRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical ImagingArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare

Quantitative ultrasound texture analysis of fetal lungs to predict neonatal respiratory morbidity

Open access
Bonet‐Carne, E., Palacio, M., Cobo, T., Perez‐Moreno, A., Lopez, M., Piraquive, J. P., Ramirez, J. C., Botet, F. +2 more·2015·Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology

Abstract

Objective: To develop and evaluate the performance of a novel method for predicting neonatal respiratory morbidity based on quantitative analysis of the fetal lung by ultrasound. Methods: More than 13 000 non‐clinical images and 900 fetal lung images were used to develop a computerized method based on texture analysis and machine learning algorithms, trained to predict neonatal respiratory morbidity risk on fetal lung ultrasound images. The method, termed ‘quantitative ultrasound fetal lung maturity analysis’ (quantusFLM™), was then validated blindly in 144 neonates, delivered at 28 + 0 to 39 + 0 weeks' gestation. Lung ultrasound images in DICOM format were obtained within 48 h of delivery and the ability of the software to predict neonatal respiratory morbidity, defined as either respiratory distress syndrome or transient tachypnea of the newborn, was determined. Results: Mean (SD) gestational age at delivery was 36 + 1 (3 + 3) weeks. Among the 144 neonates, there were 29 (20.1%) cases of neonatal respiratory morbidity. Quantitative texture analysis predicted neonatal respiratory morbidity with a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of 86.2%, 87.0%, 62.5% and 96.2%, respectively. Conclusions: Quantitative ultrasound fetal lung maturity analysis predicted neonatal respiratory morbidity with an accuracy comparable to that of current tests using amniotic fluid. Copyright © 2014 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/uog.13441

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Ultrasound-based techniques, such as lung texture analysis and 3D volumetric quantification, achieve moderate accuracy (AUC = 0.82) in predicting RDS.

    “Ultrasound-based techniques, such as lung texture analysis and 3D volumetric quantification, achieve moderate accuracy (AUC = 0.82) in predicting RDS (5, 6)”

    From Placenta-pulmonary coupling-guided multimodal AI for fetal lung maturity staging and individualized glucocorticoid therapy (2026) · cites this paper as [5]

    The Results report that fetal lung ultrasound texture analysis predicted neonatal respiratory morbidity, which included RDS and transient tachypnea, with 86.2% sensitivity and 87.0% specificity. The Methods describe analysis of a two-dimensional ultrasound image, not 3D volumetric quantification. The paper does not report an AUC of 0.82 or evaluate prediction of RDS alone. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Bonet-Carne et al. and Du et al. showed that automated fetal lung ultrasound was able to accurately predict neonatal respiratory morbidity.

    “The study of Bonet-Carne et al. and a further study of Du et al. showed that automated fetal lung ultrasound was able to accurately predict neonatal respiratory morbidity [164,165].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bonet‐Carne, E., Palacio, M., Cobo, T., Perez‐Moreno, A., Lopez, M., Piraquive, J. P., Ramirez, J. C., Botet, F., Marques, F., & Gratacos, E.
Affiliations
  • Transmural Biotech SL Barcelona Spain
  • Centre for Biomedical Network Research on Rare Diseases (ES)
  • Department of Maternal‐Fetal Medicine, ICGON, Hospital Clinic Barcelona University of Barcelona Spain
  • Hospital Clínic de Barcelona (ES)
  • Universitat Politecnica de Catalunya BarcelonaTECH Barcelona Spain
Venue
Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-04
Volume
45
Issue
4
Pages
427-433
ISSN
  • 0960-7692 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-0705
OpenAlex
W2002484772
Cited by
85
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 1
FWCI
3.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RECERCAT (Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • UPCommons institutional repository (Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Neonatal Respiratory Health Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Keywords
fetal lung ultrasound, texture analysis, neonatal respiratory morbidity, respiratory distress syndrome, transient tachypnea of the newborn, fetal lung maturity, preterm infants, machine learning prediction
MeSH terms
Adult, Algorithms, Amniotic Fluid, Evaluation Studies as Topic, Female, Fetal Organ Maturity, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Lung, Predictive Value of Tests, Pregnancy, Prospective Studies, Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn, Ultrasonography, Prenatal, Delivery, Obstetric

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review