Cited by 29Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical ImagingGestational Diabetes Research and ManagementArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare

Application of ultrasound-based radiomics technology in fetal-lung-texture analysis in pregnancies complicated by gestational diabetes and/or pre-eclampsia

Open access
Du, Y., Fang, Z., Jiao, J., Xi, G., Zhu, C., Ren, Y., Guo, Y., Wang, Y.·2021·Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To analyze and compare, using ultrasound-based radiomics technology, fetal-lung texture in pregnancies affected by gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and/or pre-eclampsia (PE) and in normal pregnancies, overall and at different gestational ages. METHODS: In this retrospective study, 430 high-throughput features per fetal-lung image were extracted from 548 fetal-lung ultrasound images (obtained at the level of the four-chamber view of the heart) in 548 pregnant women who delivered between July 2018 and August 2019 at the Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University. Images had been obtained during ultrasound examinations between 28 and 41 weeks of gestation. The data were divided randomly into training set (80% of fetal-lung images) and independent test set (20% of images), and 20% of the images in the training set were then selected as the validation set. A standard machine-learning model based on ultrasound-based radiomics technology was created using features of fetal-lung texture extracted from the images, and a regression model was used to evaluate the relationship between lung-texture features, GDM and/or PE and gestational age. RESULTS: Of the 548 pregnancies included, 108 were affected by GDM alone, 71 by PE alone and 25 by both GDM and PE, and 344 were normal. The overall performance of the GDM and PE prediction model was superior to that of the gestational-age prediction model, with an area under the receiver-operating-characteristics curve of 0.95-0.99, sensitivity of 78.8-97.1% in the validation set and 74.5-91.3% in the independent test set, specificity of 79.8-94.3% in the validation set and 75.7-88.4% in the independent test set and accuracy of 81.0-95.3% in the validation set and 80.6-86.4% in the independent test set. CONCLUSIONS: Using ultrasound-based radiomics technology, fetal lungs from pregnancies grouped according to whether they were affected by GDM and/or PE could be distinguished from each other and from fetal lungs of normal pregnancies, and lungs from pregnancies at different gestational ages could be distinguished. These findings support further research to explore the use of this non-invasive technology to predict neonatal respiratory complications in women with PE, GDM or their combination. © 2020 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/uog.22037

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Du, Y., Fang, Z., Jiao, J., Xi, G., Zhu, C., Ren, Y., Guo, Y., & Wang, Y.
Affiliations
  • Shanghai Medical College of Fudan University (CN)
  • Fudan University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Ren, Y.
  • Guo, Y.
  • Wang, Y.
Venue
Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-05
Volume
57
Issue
5
Pages
804-812
ISSN
  • 0960-7692 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-0705
OpenAlex
W3014972479
Cited by
29
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1
FWCI
2.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (17411953400, 61771143, 61871135)
  • Fudan University
  • Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality (17411953400, 18511102904)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Keywords
gestational diabetes mellitus, preeclampsia, gestational age estimation, fetal lung ultrasound, machine learning prediction models, pregnancy complications, fetal lung development
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Adult, Female, Fetal Diseases, Fetus, Gestational Age, Humans, Lung, Male, Pre-Eclampsia, Predictive Value of Tests, Pregnancy, Retrospective Studies, ROC Curve, Sensitivity and Specificity, Ultrasonography, Prenatal, Diabetes, Gestational

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review