The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Accuracy of competing‐risks model in screening for pre‐eclampsia by maternal factors and biomarkers at 11–13 weeks' gestation
Open accessAbstract
Objective: To examine the diagnostic accuracy of a previously developed model for prediction of pre‐eclampsia (PE) by a combination of maternal factors and biomarkers at 11–13 weeks' gestation. Methods: This was a prospective first‐trimester multicenter study of screening for PE in 8775 singleton pregnancies. A previously published algorithm was used for the calculation of patient‐specific risk of PE in each individual. The detection rates (DRs) and false‐positive rates (FPRs) for delivery with PE < 32, < 37 and ≥ 37 weeks were estimated and compared with those for the dataset used for development of the algorithm. Results: In the study population, 239 (2.7%) cases developed PE, of which 17 (0.2%), 59 (0.7%) and 180 (2.1%) developed PE < 32, < 37 and ≥ 37 weeks, respectively. With combined screening by maternal factors, mean arterial pressure, uterine artery pulsatility index and serum placental growth factor, the DR was 100% (95% CI, 80–100%) for PE < 32 weeks, 75% (95% CI, 62–85%) for PE < 37 weeks and 43% (95% CI, 35–50%) for PE ≥ 37 weeks, at a 10% FPR. These DRs were similar to the estimated rates for the dataset used for development of the model: 89% (95% CI, 79–96%) for PE < 32 weeks, 75% (95% CI, 70–80%) for PE < 37 weeks and 47% (95% CI, 44–51%) for PE ≥ 37 weeks. Conclusion: Assessment of a combination of maternal factors and biomarkers at 11–13 weeks provides effective first‐trimester screening for preterm PE. Copyright © 2017 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
STARD 2015: an updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies
Bossuyt, P. M., Reitsma, J. B., Bruns, D. E., Gatsonis, C. A., Glasziou, P. P., Irwig, L., Lijmer, J. G., Moher, D., Rennie, D., de Vet, H. C. W., et al. (2015) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.h5527 · Cited by 3,660
O’Gorman, N., Wright, D., Syngelaki, A., Akolekar, R., Wright, A., Poon, L. C., & Nicolaides, K. H. (2016) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2015.08.034 · Cited by 629
Self-citationUterine artery Doppler at 11 + 0 to 13 + 6 weeks in the prediction of pre‐eclampsia
Plasencia, W., Maiz, N., Bonino, S., Kaihura, C., & Nicolaides, K. H. (2007) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.5157 · Cited by 425
Self-citation
Cited by
Pre-eclampsia: pathophysiology and clinical implications
Burton, G. J., Redman, C. W., Roberts, J. M., & Moffett, A. (2019) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.l2381 · Cited by 1,250
Screening for pre-eclampsia by maternal factors and biomarkers at 11–13 weeks’ gestation
Tan, M. Y., Syngelaki, A., Poon, L. C., Rolnik, D. L., O'Gorman, N., Delgado, J. L., Akolekar, R., Konstantinidou, L., Tsavdaridou, M., Galeva, S., et al. (2018) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.19112 · Cited by 438
Self-citationO'Gorman, N., Wright, D., Poon, L. C., Rolnik, D. L., Syngelaki, A., de Alvarado, M., Carbone, I. F., Dutemeyer, V., Fiolna, M., Frick, A., et al. (2017) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.17455 · Cited by 369
Self-citationFirst trimester preeclampsia screening and prediction
Chaemsaithong, P., Sahota, D. S., & Poon, L. C. (2022) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2020.07.020 · Cited by 363
Self-citationImpact of new definitions of pre‐eclampsia on incidence and performance of first‐trimester screening
Khan, N., Andrade, W., De Castro, H., Wright, A., Wright, D., & Nicolaides, K. H. (2020) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.21867 · Cited by 59
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- O'Gorman, N., Wright, D., Poon, L. C., Rolnik, D. L., Syngelaki, A., Wright, A., Akolekar, R., Cicero, S., Janga, D., Jani, J., Molina, F. S., de Paco Matallana, C., Papantoniou, N., Persico, N., Plasencia, W., Singh, M., & Nicolaides, K. H.
- Venue
- Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017-05-14
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 751-755
- ISSN
- 0960-7692 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-0705
- OpenAlex
- W2569868133
- Cited by
- 259
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 32.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Accuracy of competing‐risks model in screening for pre‐eclampsia by maternal factors and biomarkers at 11–13 weeks' gestation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/uog.17399
- The paper
- O'Gorman, N., Wright, D., Poon, L. C., Rolnik, D. L., Syngelaki, A., Wright, A., Akolekar, R., Cicero, S., Janga, D., Jani, J., Molina, F. S., de Paco Matallana, C., Papantoniou, N., Persico, N., Plasencia, W., Singh, M., & Nicolaides, K. H. (2017). Accuracy of competing‐risks model in screening for pre‐eclampsia by maternal factors and biomarkers at 11–13 weeks' gestation. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.17399
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.