Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 218

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Uterine artery Doppler at 11–14 weeks of gestation to screen for hypertensive disorders and associated complications in an unselected population

Gómez, O., Martínez, J. M., Figueras, F., Del Río, M., Borobio, V., Puerto, B., Coll, O., Cararach, V., Vanrell, J. A.·2005·Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology

Abstract

Objectives: To establish reference values for the first‐trimester uterine artery (UtA) pulsatility index (PI) and to investigate the role of UtA Doppler in the early prediction of hypertensive disorders and their associated complications in an unselected Mediterranean population. Methods: A prospective study including 1091 consecutive singleton pregnancies undergoing routine early ultrasound screening at 11–14 weeks of gestation was performed. The left and right UtA were examined by color and pulsed Doppler transvaginally. The mean PI and the presence of bilateral protodiastolic notching were cross‐sectionally recorded. Reference ranges were calculated and the pregnancies were followed for occurrence of pre‐eclampsia, gestational hypertension, intrauterine growth restriction, placental abruption and stillbirth. The sensitivity and predictive values of a mean UtA‐PI > 95th percentile and the presence of bilateral notching in the prediction of these pregnancy complications were calculated. Results: A total of 999 women were finally included. Both the mean UtA‐PI and the prevalence of bilateral notches showed a significant linear decrease between 11 and 14 weeks' gestation. Sixty‐seven (6.7%) pregnancies developed at least one of the formerly described complications, including 22 (2.2%) cases of pre‐eclampsia and 37 (3.7%) cases with intrauterine growth restriction. Compared with women with a normal outcome, complicated pregnancies showed a significantly higher mean PI (2.04 vs. 1.75; P < 0.05, t‐test) and a higher prevalence of bilateral notching (58% vs. 41%; P < 0.05, Chi‐square test). Using the 95th percentile in mean UtA‐PI as a cut‐off, 23.9% (95% CI, 13.7–34.1) of complicated pregnancies and 30.8% (95% CI, 5.68–55.85) of severe cases were identified. Conclusions: Our results suggest that pregnancies with an increased risk of developing hypertensive disorders and related complications already have an abnormally increased UtA‐PI in early pregnancy. However, the use of a single uterine Doppler measurement for screening purposes in unselected early pregnancy populations has limited clinical value. The use of UtA‐PI combined with other screening tests needs to be determined by further investigation. Copyright © 2005 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/uog.1976

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 218

Metadata

Authors
Gómez, O., Martínez, J. M., Figueras, F., Del Río, M., Borobio, V., Puerto, B., Coll, O., Cararach, V., & Vanrell, J. A.
Venue
Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-09-23
Volume
26
Issue
5
Pages
490-494
ISSN
  • 0960-7692 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-0705
OpenAlex
W2071221843
Cited by
218
References
0
FWCI
12.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Uterine artery Doppler at 11–14 weeks of gestation to screen for hypertensive disorders and associated complications in an unselected population. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/uog.1976
The paper
Gómez, O., Martínez, J. M., Figueras, F., Del Río, M., Borobio, V., Puerto, B., Coll, O., Cararach, V., & Vanrell, J. A. (2005). Uterine artery Doppler at 11–14 weeks of gestation to screen for hypertensive disorders and associated complications in an unselected population. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.1976

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.