Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 285

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

First‐trimester uterine artery Doppler and adverse pregnancy outcome: a meta‐analysis involving 55 974 women

Open access
Velauthar, L., Plana, M. N., Kalidindi, M., Zamora, J., Thilaganathan, B., Illanes, S. E., Khan, K. S., Aquilina, J., Thangaratinam, S.·2014·Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology

Abstract

Objectives: To determine the accuracy with which uterine artery Doppler in the first trimester of pregnancy predicts pre‐eclampsia and fetal growth restriction, particularly early‐onset disease. Methods: We searched MEDLINE (1951–2012), EMBASE (1980–2012) and the Cochrane Library (2012) for relevant citations without language restrictions. Two reviewers independently selected studies that evaluated the accuracy of first‐trimester uterine artery Doppler to predict adverse pregnancy outcome and performed data extraction to construct 2 × 2 tables. We synthesized sensitivity and specificity for various Doppler indices using a bivariate random‐effects model. Results: From 1866 citations, we identified 18 studies (55 974 women). The sensitivity and specificity of abnormal uterine artery flow velocity waveform (FVW) in the prediction of early‐onset pre‐eclampsia were 47.8% (95% CI: 39.0–56.8) and 92.1% (95% CI: 88.6–94.6), and in the prediction of early‐onset fetal growth restriction were 39.2% (95% CI: 26.3–53.8) and 93.1% (95% CI: 90.6–95.0), respectively. The sensitivities for predicting any pre‐eclampsia and fetal growth restriction were 26.4% (95% CI: 22.5–30.8) and 15.4% (95% CI: 12.4–18.9), respectively, and the specificities were 93.4% (95% CI: 90.4–95.5%) and 93.3% (95% CI: 90.9–95.1), respectively. The number needed to treat (NNT) with aspirin to prevent one case of early‐onset pre‐eclampsia fell from 1000 to 173 and from 2500 to 421 for background risks varying between 1% and 0.4%, respectively. Conclusions: First‐trimester uterine artery Doppler is a useful tool for predicting early‐onset pre‐eclampsia, as well as other adverse pregnancy outcomes. Based on the NNT, abnormal uterine artery Doppler in low‐risk women achieves a sufficiently high performance to justify aspirin prophylaxis in those who test positive. Copyright © 2013 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/uog.13275

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 46 references

Cited by

See all 285

Metadata

Authors
Velauthar, L., Plana, M. N., Kalidindi, M., Zamora, J., Thilaganathan, B., Illanes, S. E., Khan, K. S., Aquilina, J., & Thangaratinam, S.
Venue
Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-04-04
Volume
43
Issue
5
Pages
500-507
ISSN
  • 0960-7692 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-0705
OpenAlex
W2135126730
Cited by
285
References
46
FWCI
18.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: First‐trimester uterine artery Doppler and adverse pregnancy outcome: a meta‐analysis involving 55 974 women. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/uog.13275
The paper
Velauthar, L., Plana, M. N., Kalidindi, M., Zamora, J., Thilaganathan, B., Illanes, S. E., Khan, K. S., Aquilina, J., & Thangaratinam, S. (2014). First‐trimester uterine artery Doppler and adverse pregnancy outcome: a meta‐analysis involving 55 974 women. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.13275

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.