Cited by 20Pelvic floor disorders treatmentsUrinary Bladder and Prostate ResearchUterine Myomas and Treatments

Does levator ani hiatal area configuration affect pelvic organ prolapse?

Xuan, Y., Friedman, T., Dietz, H. P.·2019·Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology

Abstract

Objective: Levator ani trauma and hiatal overdistension have been shown to be associated with female pelvic organ prolapse (POP); however, the role of the shape of the levator hiatus in POP has not been examined to date. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between the configuration of the levator ani hiatus and POP. Methods: This was a retrospective study of 547 women who attended a tertiary urogynecological center for symptoms of pelvic floor and lower urinary tract dysfunction between October 2014 and August 2016. All women underwent a standardized interview and prolapse assessment using the International Continence Society (ICS) Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP‐Q) method and four‐dimensional translabial ultrasound (TLUS). Measurements of the hiatal anteroposterior diameter (APD), coronal diameter (CD) and hiatal area (HA), at rest and on maximal Valsalva maneuver, and those of organ descent were performed offline at a later date by an investigator blinded to all other data. Hiatal configuration was defined as the ratio APD/CD. Associations between HA and HA adjusted by APD/CD at rest and on maximal Valsalva and symptoms and signs of prolapse were analyzed statistically using logistic regression modelling. Results: The mean age of the women was 54 ± 13.6 (range, 16–89) years. Of the 547 women included, 241 (44%) presented with prolapse symptoms. Clinically significant POP was detected in 406 (74%) patients and significant prolapse on TLUS was detected in 331 (61%). Hiatal ballooning was observed in 310 (57%) women and this was strongly associated with signs and symptoms of POP. HA at rest and on Valsalva was associated with significant POP both on clinical examination and on TLUS. Adjusted odds ratios for hiatal shape showed no effect of the hiatal configuration on the association between HA and POP. Conclusion: Hiatal shape does not seem to influence the association between HA and symptoms and signs of prolapse. Copyright © 2018 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/uog.20210

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Xuan, Y., Friedman, T., & Dietz, H. P.
Affiliations
The University of Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Dietz, H. P.
Venue
Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-06-12
Volume
54
Issue
1
Pages
124-127
ISSN
  • 0960-7692 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-0705
OpenAlex
W2906342356
Cited by
20
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2020: 3
FWCI
0.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Pelvic floor disorders treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Uterine Myomas and Treatments
Keywords
pelvic organ prolapse, anteroposterior diameter, Valsalva maneuver, POP-Q, female pelvic floor dysfunction
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Perineum, Retrospective Studies, Ultrasonography, Urologic Diseases, Valsalva Maneuver, Pelvic Floor, Imaging, Three-Dimensional, Pelvic Organ Prolapse

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review