Cited by 822Pelvic floor disorders treatmentsUterine Myomas and TreatmentsReproductive Health and Contraception

Lifetime Risk of Undergoing Surgery for Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Smith, Fiona J., Holman, C. DʼArcy J., Moorin, Rachael E., Tsokos, Nicolas·2010·Obstetrics & Gynecology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the lifetime risk of first-time incident pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery with the intention of updating previous risk estimates that have been based on members of managed-care populations. METHODS: Age-specific incidence rates of first-time prolapse surgery between 1981 and 2005 were calculated based on 44,728-incident cases. We estimated the lifetime risk as the cumulative incidence to age 85 years based on a life-table method and using the most recent cross-sectional incidence rates for the period 2001-2005. Age-standardized rates by calendar year were also calculated to show the secular trend in prolapse surgery. RESULTS: The lifetime risk of surgery for POP in the general female population was 19% based on the most recent cross-sectional rates, a figure higher than the 11-12% reported from U.S. managed-care populations. CONCLUSION: There is a relatively high likelihood that a woman in Western Australia will undergo surgery for POP during her lifetime. If, as our results suggest, the burden of genital prolapse in general populations is higher than previously thought, there is justification for a stronger evidence base for prevention, early detection and intervention to reduce the personal and societal costs of these gynecological conditions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/aog.0b013e3181f73729

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Smith, F. J., Holman, C. D. J., Moorin, R. E., & Tsokos, N.
Affiliations
The University of Western Australia (AU)
Venue
Obstetrics & Gynecology
Published
2010-11
Volume
116
Issue
5
Pages
1096-1100
ISSN
0029-7844 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1975550677
Cited by
822
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 57 · 2024: 49 · 2023: 66 · 2022: 63 · 2021: 78 · 2020: 67 · 2019: 52 · 2018: 55 · 2017: 52 · 2016: 56 · 2015: 52 · 2014: 57 · 2013: 33 · 2012: 36
FWCI
18.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion)
  • eSpace (Curtin University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Pelvic floor disorders treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Uterine Myomas and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
Keywords
pelvic organ prolapse, prolapse surgery, lifetime risk, age-specific incidence, secular trends, women's health, Western Australia
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Risk, Western Australia, Incidence, Young Adult, Pelvic Organ Prolapse

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review