Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 349

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A new method to assess fetal head descent in labor with transperineal ultrasound

Open access
Barbera, A. F., Pombar, X., Perugino, G., Lezotte, D. C., Hobbins, J. C.·2009·Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology

Abstract

Objectives: To assess the feasibility and reproducibility of measuring fetal head station and descent during labor using transperineal ultrasound (TPU) imaging, to compare the evaluation of fetal station through digital examinations with concurrent TPU assessments, and to assess its utility in distinguishing patients whose pregnancy will result in spontaneous vaginal delivery from those who will require operative vaginal delivery or Cesarean section for failure to progress. Methods: TPU and digital examinations were performed in 88 term laboring patients with a singleton fetus in cephalic presentation. Using TPU imaging, head descent was quantified by measuring the angle between the long axis of the pubic symphysis and a line extending from its most inferior portion tangentially to the fetal skull. Intraobserver and interobserver variability were calculated using variance component analysis. TPU imaging was used to measure the angle of head descent during the second stage of labor in 23 of the women. Results: Analysis of replicated measurements on 75 subjects, by the same observer at approximately the same time, yielded an average SD (intraobserver variability) of approximately 2.9° for the measurement of angle of head descent on TPU examination. A separate variance component analysis on a subset of 15 assessments for which measurements were repeated by a second observer, with two to four replicate measurements obtained by each, yielded an interobserver error estimate of 1.24°. A significant linear association was found between clinical digital assessments and measurement of angle of head descent by TPU examination (P < 0.001). An angle of at least 120° measured during the second stage of labor was always associated with subsequent spontaneous vaginal delivery. In six pregnancies ending in Cesarean section the mean angle of descent measured at last TPU examination was only 108°. Conclusions: The angle of head descent measured by TPU imaging provides an objective, accurate and reproducible means for assessing descent of the fetal head during labor. Copyright © 2009 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/uog.6329

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Cited by

See all 349

Metadata

Authors
Barbera, A. F., Pombar, X., Perugino, G., Lezotte, D. C., & Hobbins, J. C.
Venue
Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-02-26
Volume
33
Issue
3
Pages
313-319
ISSN
  • 0960-7692 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-0705
OpenAlex
W2048725876
Cited by
349
References
7
FWCI
14.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A new method to assess fetal head descent in labor with transperineal ultrasound. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/uog.6329
The paper
Barbera, A. F., Pombar, X., Perugino, G., Lezotte, D. C., & Hobbins, J. C. (2009). A new method to assess fetal head descent in labor with transperineal ultrasound. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.6329

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.