CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 272Fish Ecology and Management StudiesHydrology and Sediment Transport ProcessesDam Engineering and Safety

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 59 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Status and trends of dam removal research in the United States

Ryan Bellmore, J., Duda, Jeffrey J., Craig, Laura S., Greene, Samantha L., Torgersen, Christian E., Collins, Mathias J., Vittum, Katherine·2017·WIREs Water
DOI 10.1002/wat2.1164
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Aging infrastructure coupled with growing interest in river restoration has driven a dramatic increase in the practice of dam removal. With this increase, there has been a proliferation of studies that assess the physical and ecological responses of rivers to these removals. As more dams are considered for removal, scientific information from these dam‐removal studies will increasingly be called upon to inform decisions about whether, and how best, to bring down dams. This raises a critical question: what is the current state of dam‐removal science in the United States? To explore the status, trends, and characteristics of dam‐removal research in the U.S., we searched the scientific literature and extracted basic information from studies on dam removal. Our literature review illustrates that although over 1200 dams have been removed in the U.S., fewer than 10% have been scientifically evaluated, and most of these studies were short in duration (<4 years) and had limited (1–2 years) or no pre‐removal monitoring. The majority of studies focused on hydrologic and geomorphic responses to removal rather than biological and water‐quality responses, and few studies were published on linkages between physical and ecological components. Our review illustrates the need for long‐term, multidisciplinary case studies, with robust study designs, in order to anticipate the effects of dam removal and inform future decision making. WIREs Water 2017, 4:e1164. doi: 10.1002/wat2.1164 This article is categorized under: Water and Life > Conservation, Management, and Awareness Engineering Water > Sustainable Engineering of Water Water and Life > Stresses and Pressures on Ecosystems

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/wat2.1164

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 59 references

2 of the 59 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Heinz Center, 2002, Dam Removal Science and Decision Making
  2. Ward JW, 1983, The serial discontinuity concept of lotic systems, Dyn Lotic Ecosyst, 10, 29
  3. Graf WL, 2003, Dam Removal Research: Status and Prospects
  4. McCullough D, 1968, The Johnstown Flood: The Incredible Story Behind One of the Most Devastating Disasters America Has Ever Known
  5. 10.1017/CBO9780511542015 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Pohl MM, 2003, Dam Removal Research: Status and Prospects, 29

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 271

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Ryan Bellmore, J., Duda, J. J., Craig, L. S., Greene, S. L., Torgersen, C. E., Collins, M. J., & Vittum, K.
Affiliations
  • U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station Juneau AK USA
  • Western Fisheries Research Center (US)
  • American Rivers (US)
  • Forest and Rangeland Ecosystem Science Center (US)
  • NOAA National Marine Fisheries Service (US)
ORCID
Venue
WIREs Water
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-09-05
Volume
4
Issue
2
ISSN
2049-1948 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1002/wat2.1164
OpenAlex
W2517340568
Cited by
272
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 2
FWCI
15.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor)
Locations
Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Water (publishedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Geological Survey's John Wesley Powell Center for Analysis and Synthesis
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish Ecology and Management Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Earth-Surface Processes › Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Dam Engineering and Safety
Keywords
dam removal, river restoration, aging infrastructure, long-term monitoring, hydrological response, geomorphic response, ecological responses, water quality, research design, research gaps, decision support

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review