Cited by 9Information and Cyber SecurityGame Theory and ApplicationsCybersecurity and Information Systems

Game‐theoretic computing in risk analysis

Sahinoglu, Mehmet, Cueva‐Parra, Luis, Ang, David·2012·WIREs Computational Statistics

Abstract

Risk analysis, comprising risk assessment and risk management stages, is one of the most popular and challenging topics of our times because security and privacy, and availability and usability culminating at the trustworthiness of cybersystems and cyber information is at stake. The precautionary need derives from the existence of defenders versus adversaries, in an everlasting Darwinian scenario dating back to early human history of warriors fighting for their sustenance to survive. Fast forwarding to today's information warfare, whether in networks or healthcare or national security, the currently dire situation necessitates more than a hand calculator to optimize (maximize gains or minimize losses) risk due to prevailing scarce economic resources. This article reviews the previous works completed on this specialized topic of game‐theoretic computing, its methods and applications toward the purpose of quantitative risk assessment and cost‐optimal management in many diverse disciplines including entire range of informatics‐related topics. Additionally, this review considers certain game‐theoretic topics in depth historically, and those computationally resourceful such as Neumann's two‐way zero‐sum pure equilibrium and optimal mixed strategy solutions versus Nash equilibria with pure and mixed strategies. Computational examples are provided to highlight the significance of game‐theoretic solutions used in risk assessment and management, particularly in reference to cybersystems and information security.WIREs Comput Stat 2012, 4:227–248. doi: 10.1002/wics.1205 This article is categorized under:Algorithms and Computational Methods > Linear Programming Algorithms and Computational Methods > Networks and Security

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/wics.1205

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sahinoglu, M., Cueva‐Parra, L., & Ang, D.
Affiliations
Auburn University at Montgomery (US)
Venue
WIREs Computational Statistics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-03-15
Volume
4
Issue
3
Pages
227-248
ISSN
  • 1939-0068 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-5108
OpenAlex
W1976615099
Cited by
9
References
52
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Computational Statistics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information and Cyber Security
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Game Theory and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Cybersecurity and Information Systems
Keywords
risk analysis, risk assessment, risk management, information security, cyber systems, Nash equilibrium, mixed strategies, zero-sum games, information warfare

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review