The DOI matches its Crossref record; 82 of the 82 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 10 of the 126 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
Transmembrane protein 97 is a potential synaptic amyloid beta receptor in human Alzheimer’s disease
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Synapse loss correlates with cognitive decline in Alzheimer’s disease, and soluble oligomeric amyloid beta (Aβ) is implicated in synaptic dysfunction and loss. An important knowledge gap is the lack of understanding of how Aβ leads to synapse degeneration. In particular, there has been difficulty in determining whether there is a synaptic receptor that binds Aβ and mediates toxicity. While many candidates have been observed in model systems, their relevance to human AD brain remains unknown. This is in part due to methodological limitations preventing visualization of Aβ binding at individual synapses. To overcome this limitation, we combined two high resolution microscopy techniques: array tomography and Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) to image over 1 million individual synaptic terminals in temporal cortex from AD ( n = 11) and control cases ( n = 9). Within presynapses and post-synaptic densities, oligomeric Aβ generates a FRET signal with transmembrane protein 97. Further, Aβ generates a FRET signal with cellular prion protein, and post-synaptic density 95 within post synapses. Transmembrane protein 97 is also present in a higher proportion of post synapses in Alzheimer’s brain compared to controls. We inhibited Aβ/transmembrane protein 97 interaction in a mouse model of amyloidopathy by treating with the allosteric modulator CT1812. CT1812 drug concentration correlated negatively with synaptic FRET signal between transmembrane protein 97 and Aβ. In human-induced pluripotent stem cell derived neurons, transmembrane protein 97 is present in synapses and colocalizes with Aβ when neurons are challenged with human Alzheimer’s brain homogenate. Transcriptional changes are induced by Aβ including changes in genes involved in neurodegeneration and neuroinflammation. CT1812 treatment of these neurons caused changes in gene sets involved in synaptic function. These data support a role for transmembrane protein 97 in the synaptic binding of Aβ in human Alzheimer’s disease brain where it may mediate synaptotoxicity.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
Combining array tomography and FRET in human temporal cortex, this study finds TMEM97 in close proximity to Aβ within synapses and increased in Alzheimer’s disease synapses. In mouse and human iPSC models, the Sigma-2/TMEM97 modulator CT1812 reduces or modulates this synaptic Aβ–TMEM97 interaction.
Key findings
- In human temporal cortex, imaging over 1 million synaptic terminals showed higher TMEM97 density in AD (fold increase 1.56, p = 0.049), a higher proportion of synapses containing TMEM97 (fold increase 2.10, p = 0.027), Aβ in post-synaptic terminals (p = 0.011), and Aβ overlapping TMEM97 in the same post synapses (p = 0.0002).
- FRET showed Aβ and TMEM97 were close enough to interact in pre- and post-synapses; Aβ also generated FRET with PrPc and PSD95, and TMEM97 with PGRMC1 and PrPc, while negative controls PSD95–synaptophysin and PSD95–PGRMC1 did not.
- In APP/PS1 + Tau mice, CT1812 estimated receptor occupancy correlated negatively with synaptic Aβ–TMEM97 FRET (rho = −0.94, p = 0.017); mean FRET was not significantly different between vehicle (52.8 ± 12%) and treated (44.2 ± 5.61%) groups. Male mice had higher estimated occupancy (85.13 ± 6.4%) than females (69.69 ± 11%; p < 0.001).
- In human iPSC-derived neurons challenged with AD brain homogenate, TMEM97 localized to synapses and colocalized with Aβ; Aβ+ vs Aβ− homogenate yielded 7 differentially expressed genes, and CT1812 vs vehicle after Aβ+ yielded 8, with pathway changes involving synaptic and immune/inflammatory terms.
Methods
- Human post-mortem inferior temporal gyrus (BA20/21): AD n = 11 and control n = 9 for array tomography; 6 AD and 6 control for ELISA. The study combined array tomography (70 nm sections) with sensitized-emission FRET and used linear mixed-effects models with diagnosis*sex + (1|case/sample).
- Mice: APP/PS1 + Tau (n = 20) and littermate controls (n = 20) aged to 9 months, randomized to vehicle or CT1812 10 mg/kg/day orally in jelly for 28 days; array tomography/FRET was performed in entorhinal cortex, with the main FRET study using n = 10 APP/PS1 + Tau and n = 8 controls.
- iPSC-derived cortical neurons from LBC1936 lines EDi030, EDi034, and EDi036 at approximately day 200 post-induction were challenged with human AD brain homogenate (Aβ+ 90 pM vs Aβ− 8 pM) and CT1812 or vehicle; analyses included immunocytochemistry, TUNEL, calcium imaging, and RNA-seq with DESeq2 and pathway analysis.
Limitations
- Stated: the 6E10 antibody cannot define the structural state of Aβ; FRET demonstrates proximity but not conclusive direct interaction; the TMEM97–Aβ signal could be indirect via PrPc; and the proportion of Aβ bound to each potential receptor cannot be determined.
- Stated: only five CT1812-treated mice exceeded the 80% estimated receptor occupancy threshold, making the correlation cautious; the sex difference in drug levels was unexplained; 28-day treatment may be too short; and the 24 h iPSC pre-incubation condition had less healthy cells and only 1–2 cell lines per group.
- Evident from the text: human cohorts were small and AD cases had longer post-mortem interval (p = 0.030); CT1812 did not significantly change mean synaptic FRET, protein densities, or synaptic localization; and the key mouse correlation relies on few high-occupancy animals.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
10 of 126 cited sources checked · 4 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Oligomeric Aβ accumulates within synapses.
“We and others have observed that oligomeric amyloid beta (Aβ) peptide causes synaptic dysfunction, accumulates within in synapses, and is associated with synapse loss around plaques [34, 41, 52, 60, 64].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 5 sources checked- cites [34] Koffie RM, Hashimoto T, Tai H-C, Kay KR, Serrano-Pozo A, Joyner D et al (2012) Apolipoprotein E4 effects in Alzheimer’s disease are mediated by synaptotoxic oligomeric amyloid-β. Brain 135:2155–2168. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/aws127 source
- cites [41] Lue LF, Kuo YM, Roher AE, Brachova L, Shen Y, Sue L et al (1999) Soluble amyloid beta peptide concentration as a predictor of synaptic change in Alzheimer’s disease. Am J Pathol 155:853–862. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9440(10)65184-x source
The Abstract reports that soluble Aβ concentrations correlate with synapse loss, but it does not identify the measured Aβ as oligomeric or locate it within synapses. A search of our copy for oligomeric Aβ and synaptic localization found no passage establishing accumulation within synapses; page numbers were unavailable. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [52] Pickett EK, Koffie RM, Wegmann S, Henstridge CM, Herrmann AG, Colom-Cadena M et al (2016) Non-fibrillar oligomeric amyloid-β within synapses. J Alzheimers Dis 53:787–800. https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-160007 source
- cites [60] Shankar GM, Li S, Mehta TH, Garcia-Munoz A, Shepardson NE, Smith I et al (2008) Amyloid-beta protein dimers isolated directly from Alzheimer’s brains impair synaptic plasticity and memory. Nat Med 14:837–842. https://doi.org/10.1038/nm1782 source
The paper reports soluble Aβ oligomers in AD cortex and their effects on synaptic function and dendritic spine density, but those findings do not establish that oligomers accumulate within synapses. A search for synaptic localization or enrichment in synaptic fractions found no passage in our copy that addresses that specific claim. (LLM, conf=0.73)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [64] Spires-Jones TL, Hyman BT (2014) The intersection of amyloid beta and tau at synapses in Alzheimer’s disease. Neuron 82:756–771. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2014.05.004 source
- Findingown data
CT1812 treatment of these neurons caused changes in gene sets involved in synaptic function.
“CT1812 treatment of these neurons caused changes in gene sets involved in synaptic function.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
Transcriptional changes are induced by Aβ including changes in genes involved in neurodegeneration and neuroinflammation.
“Transcriptional changes are induced by Aβ including changes in genes involved in neurodegeneration and neuroinflammation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In human-induced pluripotent stem cell derived neurons, transmembrane protein 97 is present in synapses.
“In human-induced pluripotent stem cell derived neurons, transmembrane protein 97 is present in synapses and colocalizes with Aβ when neurons are challenged with human Alzheimer’s brain homogenate.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Aβ generates a FRET signal with post-synaptic density 95 within post synapses.
“Further, Aβ generates a FRET signal with cellular prion protein, and post-synaptic density 95 within post synapses.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
- Findingown data
CT1812 drug concentration correlated negatively with synaptic FRET signal between transmembrane protein 97 and Aβ.
“CT1812 drug concentration correlated negatively with synaptic FRET signal between transmembrane protein 97 and Aβ.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Aβ generates a FRET signal with cellular prion protein within post synapses.
“Further, Aβ generates a FRET signal with cellular prion protein, and post-synaptic density 95 within post synapses.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In human-induced pluripotent stem cell derived neurons, transmembrane protein 97 colocalizes with Aβ when neurons are challenged with human Alzheimer's brain homogenate.
“In human-induced pluripotent stem cell derived neurons, transmembrane protein 97 is present in synapses and colocalizes with Aβ when neurons are challenged with human Alzheimer’s brain homogenate.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Within presynapses and post-synaptic densities, oligomeric Aβ generates a FRET signal with transmembrane protein 97.
“Within presynapses and post-synaptic densities, oligomeric Aβ generates a FRET signal with transmembrane protein 97.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Transmembrane protein 97 is present in a higher proportion of post synapses in Alzheimer's brain compared to controls.
“Transmembrane protein 97 is also present in a higher proportion of post synapses in Alzheimer’s brain compared to controls.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Brain homogenate treatments were not cytotoxic compared to media (Fig. 5B, C).
“Both cell counts and TUNEL assay showed that the brain homogenate treatments were not cytotoxic compared to media (Fig. 5B, C), which is important as we wish to model synaptic damage, not neuron death, since oligomers of Aβ at physiological concentrations in human brain are thought to cause synaptic damage and not to induce neuron death directly.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Oligomers of Aβ at physiological concentrations in human brain cause synaptic damage and not neuron death directly.
- Findingown data
The proportion of synapses with TMEM97 is increased in Alzheimer's when compared to healthy controls (fold increase: 2.10; effect of disease F[1,20.16] = 5.67, p = 0.027).
“The analysis of over 1 million individual synaptic terminals revealed an increased proportion of synapses with TMEM97 in Alzheimer’s when compared to healthy controls (fold increase: 2.10; effect of disease F[1,20.16] = 5.67, p = 0.027, Fig. 2).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
There was a statistically significant increase in drug concentration in male compared with female mice.
“a statistically significant increase in drug concentration in male when compared with female mice”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The increase of estimated receptor occupancy by the drug significantly correlated with a decrease of synaptic FRET signal between Aβ and TMEM97 (rho = − 0.94, p = 0.017).
“However, the increase of estimated receptor occupancy by the drug significantly correlated with a decrease of synaptic FRET signal between Aβ and TMEM97 (rho = − 0.94, p = 0.017, Fig. 4F).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Aβ object density was elevated close to Aβ plaques (effect of plaque distance F[4,Inf] = 47.86, p < 0.0001).
“As expected, Aβ object density was elevated close to Aβ plaques (effect of plaque distance F[4,Inf] = 47.86, p < 0.0001; Fig. 1D).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
There was no significant FRET signal between PSD95 and synaptophysin.
“As expected, there was not a significant FRET signal between these pre and post-synaptic proteins.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
We found a FRET effect between Aβ and PrPc in the same cases.
“The fact that we also found a FRET effect between Aβ and PrPc in the same cases”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
There was no FRET signal between PGRMC1 and PSD95.
“There was also no FRET signal between PGRMC1 and PSD95 (Fig. 3).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Although not statistically significant, the fold changes of these 7 genes largely changed in the opposite direction with treatment with CT1812.
“Although not statistically significant, the fold changes of these 7 genes largely changed in the opposite direction with treatment with CT1812 (Table S3).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Treatment with Alzheimer's brain homogenate containing soluble Aβ induced over 4000 differentially expressed genes compared to media treatment.
“Treatment with Alzheimer’s brain homogenate containing soluble Aβ induced over 4000 differentially expressed genes compared to media treatment.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Cytotoxicity was generally low (< 10%) in all conditions.
“Cytotoxicity was generally low (< 10%) in all conditions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
TMEM97 generates a FRET signal with oligomeric Aβ in both pre and post synapses using NAB61 to label oligomers and fibrillar oligomers of Aβ.
“We confirmed that TMEM97 generates a FRET signal with oligomeric Aβ in both pre and post synapses using NAB61 to label oligomers and fibrillar oligomers of Aβ (Fig. 3).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Both Aβ40 and Aβ42 levels are increased in synaptic fractions of AD brain.
“In the present study, we confirmed biochemically that both Aβ40 and Aβ42 levels are increased in synaptic fractions of AD brain (Fig. S2).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
TMEM97 is present in homer positive post synaptic puncta in dendritic spines.
“Immunocytochemistry confirms that TMEM97 is present in homer positive post synaptic puncta in dendritic spines and that when treated with Aβ-containing brain homogenate, Aβ also accumulates in synapses (Fig. 5A).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Only five treated mice exhibited drug concentrations above the 80% estimated receptor occupancy.
“only five treated mice exhibited drug concentrations above the 80% estimated receptor occupancy”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Variable levels of CT1812, both under and over the 80% RO threshold, were observed in this study.
“variable levels of CT1812, both under and over the 80% RO threshold, were observed in this study”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Treatment with CT1812 did not significantly change expression of these 7 genes compared to vehicle after Aβ + homogenate.
“Treatment with CT1812 did not significantly change expression of these 7 genes compared to vehicle after Aβ + homogenate.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
We found increased levels of TMEM97 in human Alzheimer's cases.
“we found increased levels of TMEM97 in human Alzheimer’s cases”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The increase in drug estimated receptor occupancy in male mice was observed in both genotypes (β = 44.63; p = 0.006).
“The increase in drug estimated receptor occupancy in male mice was observed in both genotypes (β = 44.63; p = 0.006, Supplementary Fig S3).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Aβ was present in post-synaptic terminals (effect of disease F[1,21.86] = 7.56, p = 0.011).
“In line with the hypothesis that TMEM97 is a binding partner of Aβ, we found that Aβ was present in post-synaptic terminals (effect of disease F[1,21.86] = 7.56, p = 0.011, Fig. 2).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Acute treatment with homogenate or drug does not change peak frequency of GCaMP between Aβ + or Aβ + homogenate or CT1812 or vehicle.
“Quantification of the peak frequency of GCaMP normalized to the baseline condition for each group shows that acute treatment with homogenate or drug does not change between Aβ + or Aβ + homogenate or CT1812 or vehicle.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The increase in TMEM97 density was not related to the proximity of an Aβ plaque.
“This increase was not related to the proximity of an Aβ plaque (Fig. 1B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Three of the genes upregulated by Aβ + homogenate challenge are expressed in neurons and implicated in neurodegenerative diseases (DYS-dystonin, SACS-sacsin, and VPS13C-vacuolar protein sorting 13).
“Three of the genes upregulated by Aβ + homogenate challenge are expressed in neurons and implicated in neurodegenerative diseases (DYS—dystonin, SACS—sacsin, and VPS13C—vacuolar protein sorting 13).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The treatment of non-transgenic control mice did not affect the density of Aβ, Tau or PSD95.
“The treatment of non-transgenic control mice did not affect the density of Aβ, Tau or PSD95 (Supplementary Fig S2A-B), confirming that treatment with this compound was not synaptotoxic.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In Alzheimer's cases, in both post and pre synapses where donor and acceptor were present, Aβ labelled with 6E10 antibody and TMEM97 were close enough to generate a FRET signal.
“In Alzheimer’s cases, we found that in both post and pre synapses where donor and acceptor were present, Aβ labelled with 6E10 antibody and TMEM97 were close enough to generate a FRET signal (Fig. 3).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Positive FRET signal was seen between Aβ and PSD95.
“Confirming cellular localization of Aβ to synapses, we saw positive FRET signal between Aβ and PSD95 (Fig. 3).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
There was no significant difference between vehicle and CT1812 groups in synaptic FRET signal between Aβ and TMEM97 (vehicle mean 52.8 ± 12%; treated mean 44.2 ± 5.61%).
“When we modelled the effect of treatment and sex on the synaptic FRET signal between Aβ and TMEM97, we did not observe a significant difference between groups (vehicle mean 52.8 ± 12%; treated mean 44.2 ± 5.61%, Fig. 4D).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
We found close proximity between TMEM97 and Aβ at the synapses.
“a close proximity between TMEM97 and Aβ at the synapses”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
These included the JAK/STAT pathway, indicated by Leukemia Inhibitory Factor (LIF) and Leukemia Inhibitory Factor Receptor (LIFR) enrichment.
“These included the JAK/STAT pathway known to be involved in astrocyte differentiation and function, indicated by Leukemia Inhibitory Factor (LIF) and Leukemia Inhibitory Factor Receptor (LIFR) enrichment, a known pro-inflammatory cytokine involved in the differentiation of neuronal precursor cells into astrocytes (Fig. 5F).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
None of the variables controlled in the present study could explain the drug concentration differences between males and females.
“None of the variables controlled in the present study could explain the drug concentration differences between males and females”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Postsynaptic puncta density was further reduced in the vicinity of Aβ plaque cores of Alzheimer's cases (effect of plaque distance F[4,Inf] = 4.44, p = 0.001, no sex effect).
“Postsynaptic puncta density was further reduced in the vicinity of Aβ plaque cores of Alzheimer’s cases (effect of plaque distance F[4,Inf] = 4.44, p = 0.001, no sex effect, Fig. 1C).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In human synapses, TMEM97 and Aβ are close enough to generate a FRET effect.
“Here we observe that in human synapses, TMEM97 and Aβ are close enough to generate a FRET effect”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In the Alzheimer's mouse model, reduction of Aβ binding to TMEM97, reflected by decreased FRET signal, was associated with increased estimated receptor occupancy of CT1812, only when using the 80% receptor occupancy threshold.
“we were able to see a reduction of the Aβ potential binding to TMEM97—as reflected by the decrease of FRET signal—associated with increased estimated receptor occupancy of the investigational drug CT1812, only when using the 80% receptor occupancy threshold”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Body weight did not differ between treatment groups (F[1, 36] = 0.74, p = 0.40).
“Body weight, which could affect drug uptake, did not differ between treatment groups (F[1, 36] = 0.74, p = 0.40), but body weight was different between male and female mice with males being heavier (F[1, 36] = 62.33, p < 0.0001).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation
We have confirmed the interaction of TMEM97 with NAB61, an antibody that preferentially recognises fibrillar oligomers and reacts with synaptic oligomeric Aβ.
“The structural state of Aβ labelled with 6E10 antibody(monomer, oligomer or fibril) recognised in the present array tomography studies is not clear, which is a limitation of the study, but we have confirmed the interaction of TMEM7 with NAB61, an antibody that preferentially recognises fibrillar oligomers and reacts with synaptic oligomeric Aβ [34].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [34] Koffie RM, Hashimoto T, Tai H-C, Kay KR, Serrano-Pozo A, Joyner D et al (2012) Apolipoprotein E4 effects in Alzheimer’s disease are mediated by synaptotoxic oligomeric amyloid-β. Brain 135:2155–2168. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/aws127 source
- Findingown data
Pathway analysis using MetaCore (unadjusted p < 0.05) revealed enrichment of immune/inflammatory pathways with Aβ treatment compared to immunodepleted Aβ treatment.
“Although only a handful of transcripts reached a statistically significant change after correcting for multiple testing, pathway analysis using a less strict criteria of p < 0.05 unajdusted p values to look for patterns of expression changes using MetaCore, revealed enrichment of immune/inflammatory pathways with Aβ treatment compared to immunodepleted Aβ treatment.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
When treated with Aβ-containing brain homogenate, Aβ accumulates in synapses.
“Immunocytochemistry confirms that TMEM97 is present in homer positive post synaptic puncta in dendritic spines and that when treated with Aβ-containing brain homogenate, Aβ also accumulates in synapses (Fig. 5A).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
There was no statistically significant change in mean densities of Aβ, TMEM97 or PSD95 or the synaptic localization of Aβ and/or TMEM97 in the CT1812 treated group compared to vehicle.
“there was no statistically significant change in mean densities of Aβ, TMEM97 or PSD95 or the synaptic localization of Aβ and/or TMEM97 in the CT1812 treated group compared to vehicle”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Eight genes were differentially expressed with CT1812 treatment after Aβ + homogenate challenge.
“Eight genes were differentially expressed with CT1812 treatment after Aβ + homogenate challenge (Fig. 5E, Supplementary Table 3).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Biological pathways changed by CT1812 vs vehicle treatment after challenge with Aβ homogenate include several processes important for synaptic function.
“Further, biological pathways changed by CT1812 vs vehicle treatment after challenge with Aβ homogenate include several processes important for synaptic function (Supplementary Table 4).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In the present study, we visualized TMEM97 within individual synapses in human brain.
“In the present study, we visualized TMEM97 within individual synapses in human brain.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Increase of estimated receptor occupancy by the drug significantly correlated with a decrease of synaptic FRET signal between Aβ and TMEM97 (rho = −0.94, p = 0.017).
“the increase of estimated receptor occupancy by the drug significantly correlated with a decrease of synaptic FRET signal between Aβ and TMEM97 (rho = − 0.94, p = 0.017, Fig. 4F)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Aβ was found overlapping TMEM97 immunoreactivity in the same post synapses (effect of disease F[1,20.66] = 19.72, p = 0.0002).
“Importantly, that Aβ was found overlapping TMEM97 immunoreactivity in the same post synapses (effect of disease F[1,20.66] = 19.72, p = 0.0002, Fig. 2).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
"Synapse" was the top UniProt Keyword of the Aβ + Drug vs. Aβ + Vehicle (unadjusted p < 0.05), with a strength of 0.54 and a FDR of 0.00019.
“Further, “Synapse” was the top UniProt Keyword of the Aβ + Drug vs. Aβ + Vehicle (unadjusted p < 0.05), with a strength of 0.54 and a FDR of 0.00019.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Acutely across lines from 3 donors, CT1812 treatment does not cause excessive excitation.
“acutely across lines from 3 donors that CT1812 treatment does not cause excessive excitation”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
CHI3L1 was significantly changed by CT1812 treatment.
“One of the transcripts significantly changed by CT1812 treatment, CHI3L1”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Our iPSC-derived neurons are active at 180 days post-differentiation.
“our iPSC-derived neurons are active at 180 days post-differentiation—the time point when RNA was also collected for sequencing”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
CT1812 treatment of human iPSC-derived neurons caused multiple changes in transcripts involved in synaptic function.
“CT1812 treatment of human iPSC-derived neurons caused multiple changes in transcripts involved in synaptic function”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In human Alzheimer's brains, we found close colocalization of TMEM97 with Aβ in synapses.
“close colocalization of TMEM97 with Aβ in synapses”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Pathway analysis using MetaCore revealed enrichment of astrocytic and immune/inflammatory pathways with Aβ treatment compared to immunodepleted Aβ treatment, including the JAK/STAT pathway.
“pathway analysis using MetaCore (unadjusted p value < 0.05) revealed enrichment of astrocytic and immune/inflammatory pathways with Aβ treatment compared to immunodepleted Aβ treatment, including the JAK/STAT pathway”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Functional data using calcium imaging showed an interaction between CT1812 and Aβ treatment.
“Our functional data using calcium imaging similarly showed an interaction between CT1812 and Aβ treatment”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
UniProt pathway analysis identified 'Synapse' as the most significant term in transcripts altered by CT1812.
“UniProt pathway analysis identified “Synapse” as the most significant term in transcripts altered by CT1812”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In plaque-bearing mice, CT1812 treatment reduced astrocyte burden in hippocampus.
“in our plaque-bearing mice, CT1812 treatment reduced astrocyte burden in hippocampus”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Eight transcripts were regulated by CT1812 using a highly stringent statistical criterion (B-H adjusted p < 0.05).
“Of the eight transcripts regulated by CT1812 using a highly stringent statistically criterion (B-H adjusted p < 0.05)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Protocadherin gamma-B4 (PCDHGB4) was one of the eight transcripts regulated by CT1812.
“was Protocadherin gamma-B4 (PCDHGB4)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In human Alzheimer's brains, we found increased synaptic levels of TMEM97.
“in human Alzheimer’s brains we found increased synaptic levels of TMEM97”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Our transcriptomic data from human iPSC-derived neurons challenged with Alzheimer's brain derived Aβ confirms neuroinflammatory and neurodegenerative related changes with Aβ challenge.
“Our transcriptomic data from human iPSC-derived neurons challenged with Alzheimer’s brain derived Aβ confirms neuroinflammatory and neurodegenerative related changes with Aβ challenge.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Treatment with CT1812 reduces astrogliosis in hippocampus in mice.
“We also see in mice that treatment with CT1812 reduces astrogliosis in hippocampus”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Substantial evidence supports an important role for Aβ in synaptotoxicity early in the disease process in Alzheimer's.
“While it is clear that toxicity of tau and changes in non-neuronal cells are also important in disease pathogenesis [24], substantial evidence supports an important role for Aβ in synaptotoxicity early in the disease process in Alzheimer’s [38].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [38] Li S, Selkoe DJ (2020) A mechanistic hypothesis for the impairment of synaptic plasticity by soluble Aβ oligomers from Alzheimer’s brain. J Neurochem 154:583–597. https://doi.org/10.1111/jnc.15007 source
- Premisecitation
In Alzheimer's disease, synapse loss is the strongest pathological correlate of cognitive decline.
“In Alzheimer’s disease, synapse loss is an early event in the aetiology of the disease and is the strongest pathological correlate of cognitive decline [17, 56, 67].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [17] DeKosky ST, Scheff SW (1990) Synapse loss in frontal cortex biopsies in Alzheimer’s disease: correlation with cognitive severity. Ann Neurol 27:457–464. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.410270502 source
- cites [56] Scheff SW, Price DA, Schmitt FA, Mufson EJ (2006) Hippocampal synaptic loss in early Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment. Neurobiol Aging 27:1372–1384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2005.09.012 source
- cites [67] Terry RD, Masliah E, Salmon DP, Butters N, DeTeresa R, Hill R et al (1991) Physical basis of cognitive alterations in alzheimer’s disease: synapse loss is the major correlate of cognitive impairment. Ann Neurol 30:572–580. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.410300410 source
- Premisecitation
Our group recently found increased levels of TMEM97 in synaptoneurosomes from Alzheimer's cases, compared to control, in a proteomics study.
“In addition, our group recently found increased levels of TMEM97 in synaptoneurosomes from Alzheimer’s cases, compared to control, in a proteomics study [25], supporting a potential role in synaptotoxicity in humans.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [25] Hesse R, Hurtado ML, Jackson RJ, Eaton SL, Herrmann AG, Colom-Cadena M et al (2019) Comparative profiling of the synaptic proteome from Alzheimer’s disease patients with focus on the APOE genotype. Acta Neuropathol Commun 7:214. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40478-019-0847-7 source
- Premisecitation
Oligomeric amyloid beta (Aβ) peptide causes synaptic dysfunction.
“We and others have observed that oligomeric amyloid beta (Aβ) peptide causes synaptic dysfunction, accumulates within in synapses, and is associated with synapse loss around plaques [34, 41, 52, 60, 64].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 5 sources checked- cites [34] Koffie RM, Hashimoto T, Tai H-C, Kay KR, Serrano-Pozo A, Joyner D et al (2012) Apolipoprotein E4 effects in Alzheimer’s disease are mediated by synaptotoxic oligomeric amyloid-β. Brain 135:2155–2168. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/aws127 source
- cites [41] Lue LF, Kuo YM, Roher AE, Brachova L, Shen Y, Sue L et al (1999) Soluble amyloid beta peptide concentration as a predictor of synaptic change in Alzheimer’s disease. Am J Pathol 155:853–862. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9440(10)65184-x source
A check is scheduled.
- cites [52] Pickett EK, Koffie RM, Wegmann S, Henstridge CM, Herrmann AG, Colom-Cadena M et al (2016) Non-fibrillar oligomeric amyloid-β within synapses. J Alzheimers Dis 53:787–800. https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-160007 source
- cites [60] Shankar GM, Li S, Mehta TH, Garcia-Munoz A, Shepardson NE, Smith I et al (2008) Amyloid-beta protein dimers isolated directly from Alzheimer’s brains impair synaptic plasticity and memory. Nat Med 14:837–842. https://doi.org/10.1038/nm1782 source
A check is scheduled.
- cites [64] Spires-Jones TL, Hyman BT (2014) The intersection of amyloid beta and tau at synapses in Alzheimer’s disease. Neuron 82:756–771. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2014.05.004 source
A check is scheduled.
- Interpretationown data
Sigma-2 receptor complex allosteric modulator CT1812 can reduce interactions between TMEM97 and Aβ in vivo.
“We demonstrate that TMEM97 is a potential Aβ synaptic binding partner in human brain tissue and confirms that Sigma-2 receptor complex allosteric modulator CT1812 can reduce interactions between TMEM97 and Aβ in vivo.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Oligomeric Aβ is associated with synapse loss around plaques.
“We and others have observed that oligomeric amyloid beta (Aβ) peptide causes synaptic dysfunction, accumulates within in synapses, and is associated with synapse loss around plaques [34, 41, 52, 60, 64].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 5 sources checked- cites [34] Koffie RM, Hashimoto T, Tai H-C, Kay KR, Serrano-Pozo A, Joyner D et al (2012) Apolipoprotein E4 effects in Alzheimer’s disease are mediated by synaptotoxic oligomeric amyloid-β. Brain 135:2155–2168. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/aws127 source
- cites [41] Lue LF, Kuo YM, Roher AE, Brachova L, Shen Y, Sue L et al (1999) Soluble amyloid beta peptide concentration as a predictor of synaptic change in Alzheimer’s disease. Am J Pathol 155:853–862. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9440(10)65184-x source
- cites [52] Pickett EK, Koffie RM, Wegmann S, Henstridge CM, Herrmann AG, Colom-Cadena M et al (2016) Non-fibrillar oligomeric amyloid-β within synapses. J Alzheimers Dis 53:787–800. https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-160007 source
- cites [60] Shankar GM, Li S, Mehta TH, Garcia-Munoz A, Shepardson NE, Smith I et al (2008) Amyloid-beta protein dimers isolated directly from Alzheimer’s brains impair synaptic plasticity and memory. Nat Med 14:837–842. https://doi.org/10.1038/nm1782 source
- cites [64] Spires-Jones TL, Hyman BT (2014) The intersection of amyloid beta and tau at synapses in Alzheimer’s disease. Neuron 82:756–771. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2014.05.004 source
- Premisecitation
In Alzheimer's disease, synapse loss is an early event in the aetiology of the disease.
“In Alzheimer’s disease, synapse loss is an early event in the aetiology of the disease and is the strongest pathological correlate of cognitive decline [17, 56, 67].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [17] DeKosky ST, Scheff SW (1990) Synapse loss in frontal cortex biopsies in Alzheimer’s disease: correlation with cognitive severity. Ann Neurol 27:457–464. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.410270502 source
- cites [56] Scheff SW, Price DA, Schmitt FA, Mufson EJ (2006) Hippocampal synaptic loss in early Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment. Neurobiol Aging 27:1372–1384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2005.09.012 source
- cites [67] Terry RD, Masliah E, Salmon DP, Butters N, DeTeresa R, Hill R et al (1991) Physical basis of cognitive alterations in alzheimer’s disease: synapse loss is the major correlate of cognitive impairment. Ann Neurol 30:572–580. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.410300410 source
- Premisecitation
In cellular models, TMEM97 forms a ternary complex with PGRMC1 and LDLR.
“Linking this function to Alzheimer’s, in cellular models, TMEM97 has recently been shown to form a ternary complex with Progesterone receptor membrane component 1 (PGRMC1) and LDLR [55] that may control the internalization of monomers and oligomers of Aβ [54].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [55] Riad A, Zeng C, Weng C-C, Winters H, Xu K, Makvandi M et al (2018) Sigma-2 receptor/TMEM97 and PGRMC-1 increase the rate of internalization of LDL by LDL receptor through the formation of a ternary complex. Sci Rep 8:16845. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-35430-3 source
- Premisecitation
Most Aβ binding partners have not been validated in Alzheimer's cases nor using human derived Aβ species.
“An important outstanding question in the field is which of these potential partners binds Aβ in human synapses, as most binding partners have not been validated in Alzheimer’s cases nor using human derived Aβ species [38, 63].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [38] Li S, Selkoe DJ (2020) A mechanistic hypothesis for the impairment of synaptic plasticity by soluble Aβ oligomers from Alzheimer’s brain. J Neurochem 154:583–597. https://doi.org/10.1111/jnc.15007 source
- cites [63] Smith LM, Strittmatter SM (2017) Binding sites for amyloid-β oligomers and synaptic toxicity. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med 7:a024075. https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a024075 source
- Study design and conductcitation
Sample sizes were based on power calculations using effect size of 0.79 from previous human array tomography studies looking at colocalization of clusterin and Aβ in synapses in Alzheimer's, indicating that n = 6 per group is sufficient at power = 0.8 to detect a difference between colocalization of proteins at synapses between AD and controls.
“Sample sizes were based on power calculations using effect size of 0.79 from our previous human array tomography studies looking at colocalization of clusterin and Aβ in synapses in Alzheimer’s [29] indicating that n = 6 per group is sufficient at power = 0.8 to detect a difference between colocalization of proteins at synapses between AD and controls (calculated using the WebPower package in R 4.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [29] Jackson RJ, Rose J, Tulloch J, Henstridge C, Smith C, Spires-Jones TL (2019) Clusterin accumulates in synapses in Alzheimer’s disease and is increased in apolipoprotein E4 carriers. Brain Commun 1:fcz003. https://doi.org/10.1093/braincomms/fcz003 source
- Study design and conductown data
The Alzheimer's and control cohorts are age matched (Wilcoxon test W = 29.5, p = 0.13).
“Our Alzheimer’s and control cohorts are age (Wilcoxon test W = 29.5, p = 0.13) and sex matched (p = 1 Fisher’s exact test) and matched for APOE4 allele status (Fisher’s exact test p = 0.41).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Izzo and colleagues included only male mice in the study.
“Izzo and colleagues included only male mice in the study”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [27] Izzo NJ, Staniszewski A, To L, Fa M, Teich AF, Saeed F et al (2014) Alzheimer’s therapeutics targeting amyloid beta 1–42 oligomers I: Abeta 42 oligomer binding to specific neuronal receptors is displaced by drug candidates that improve cognitive deficits. PLoS ONE 9:e111898. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0111898 source
- Interpretationreasoning
The beneficial effects of modulating TMEM97 and PrPc could be through a similar mechanism.
“these data indicate their beneficial effects could be through a similar mechanism”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
These findings link a therapeutic target (TMEM97) with a suspected pathological peptide (Aβ) in a key cellular structure (the synapse).
“Taken together, these findings link a therapeutic target (TMEM97) with a suspected pathological peptide (Aβ) in a key cellular structure (the synapse).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The FRET effect between TMEM97 and Aβ does not conclusively show a direct interaction.
“but does not conclusively show a direct interaction”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Previous studies demonstrating CT1812-mediated improvement in cognitive performance were conducted following 9-10 weeks of administration.
“previous studies demonstrating CT1812-mediated improvement in cognitive performance were conducted following 9–10 weeks of administration [27]”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [27] Izzo NJ, Staniszewski A, To L, Fa M, Teich AF, Saeed F et al (2014) Alzheimer’s therapeutics targeting amyloid beta 1–42 oligomers I: Abeta 42 oligomer binding to specific neuronal receptors is displaced by drug candidates that improve cognitive deficits. PLoS ONE 9:e111898. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0111898 source
- Study design and conductown data
The Alzheimer's and control cohorts are sex matched (p = 1 Fisher's exact test).
“Our Alzheimer’s and control cohorts are age (Wilcoxon test W = 29.5, p = 0.13) and sex matched (p = 1 Fisher’s exact test) and matched for APOE4 allele status (Fisher’s exact test p = 0.41).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Sigma-2 receptor modulators reduce oligomeric Aβ binding to neuronal synapses.
“showing a reduction in oligomeric Aβ binding to neuronal synapses in the presence of Sigma-2 receptor modulators [27]”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [27] Izzo NJ, Staniszewski A, To L, Fa M, Teich AF, Saeed F et al (2014) Alzheimer’s therapeutics targeting amyloid beta 1–42 oligomers I: Abeta 42 oligomer binding to specific neuronal receptors is displaced by drug candidates that improve cognitive deficits. PLoS ONE 9:e111898. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0111898 source
- Interpretationreasoning
The Aβ that is interacting with TMEM97 observed in this study may be predominantly fibril as opposed to oligomeric.
“suggesting that the Aβ that is interacting with TMEM97 observed in this study may be predominantly fibril as opposed to oligomeric”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Our data support the idea of protein complexes interacting with Aβ.
“our data do support the idea of protein complexes interacting with Aβ”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
In human cases, TMEM97 is increased in biochemically isolated synapses of Alzheimer's patients compared to age-matched controls, using an unbiased proteomic approach.
“In human cases, we observed TMEM97 is increased in biochemically isolated synapses of Alzheimer’s patients compared to age-matched controls, using an unbiased proteomic approach [25].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [25] Hesse R, Hurtado ML, Jackson RJ, Eaton SL, Herrmann AG, Colom-Cadena M et al (2019) Comparative profiling of the synaptic proteome from Alzheimer’s disease patients with focus on the APOE genotype. Acta Neuropathol Commun 7:214. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40478-019-0847-7 source
- Study design and conductown data
The Alzheimer's and control cohorts are matched for APOE4 allele status (Fisher's exact test p = 0.41).
“Our Alzheimer’s and control cohorts are age (Wilcoxon test W = 29.5, p = 0.13) and sex matched (p = 1 Fisher’s exact test) and matched for APOE4 allele status (Fisher’s exact test p = 0.41).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
In CT1812 treated APP/PS1 + Tau mice with estimated receptor occupancy in the therapeutic range, there was a decreased synaptic FRET signal between Aβ and TMEM97, indicating increased distance between the two proteins.
“Taken together, we found that in the CT1812 treated APP/PS1 + Tau mice with estimated receptor occupancy in the therapeutic range, there was a decreased synaptic FRET signal between Aβ and TMEM97, indicating increased distance between the two proteins.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisereasoning
Those findings and the fact that TMEM97 modulators are pharmacologically well studied, have brought the use of TMEM97 modulators into Phase II clinical trials for Alzheimer's treatment.
“Those findings and the fact that TMEM97 modulators are pharmacologically well studied, have brought the use of TMEM97 modulators into Phase II clinical trials for Alzheimer’s treatment [11, 21].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [11] Cognition Therapeutics (2020) A Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, phase 2 study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of CT1812 in subjects with mild to moderate Alzheimer’s disease. https://iadrp.nia.nih.gov/project/randomized-double-blind-placebo-controlled-parallel-group-phase-ii-study-evaluate-safety-1
- cites [21] Grundman M, Morgan R, Lickliter JD, Schneider LS, DeKosky S, Izzo NJ et al (2019) A phase 1 clinical trial of the sigma-2 receptor complex allosteric antagonist CT1812, a novel therapeutic candidate for Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement (N Y) 5:20–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trci.2018.11.001 source
- Premisecitation
The 80% receptor occupancy threshold has been previously reported to be required for efficacy.
“the 80% receptor occupancy threshold for which has been previously reported to be required for efficacy”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [27] Izzo NJ, Staniszewski A, To L, Fa M, Teich AF, Saeed F et al (2014) Alzheimer’s therapeutics targeting amyloid beta 1–42 oligomers I: Abeta 42 oligomer binding to specific neuronal receptors is displaced by drug candidates that improve cognitive deficits. PLoS ONE 9:e111898. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0111898 source
- Premisecitation
It is likely that Aβ is in fact interacting with more than one protein.
“It is likely that Aβ is in fact interacting with more than one protein [62].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [62] Smith LM, Kostylev MA, Lee S, Strittmatter SM (2019) Systematic and standardized comparison of reported amyloid-β receptors for sufficiency, affinity, and Alzheimer’s disease relevance. J Biol Chem 294:6042–6053. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.RA118.006252 source
- Interpretationown data
Our current results support a mechanistic explanation that includes a potentially direct interaction between Aβ and TMEM97, as suggested by the FRET findings.
“Our current results support a mechanistic explanation that includes a potentially direct interaction between Aβ and TMEM97, as suggested by the FRET findings (Fig. 6).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
CT1812 dosed orally can engage the target, the TMEM97 (Sigma-2) receptor, in the brain, in a drug exposure-dependent manner.
“is supportive that CT1812 dosed orally can engage the target, the TMEM97 (Sigma-2) receptor, in the brain, in a drug exposure-dependent manner”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
In cellular models, treatment with modulators or knocking out Sigma-2 receptor (S2R) constituents TMEM97 or the co-receptor PGRMC1 reduces the internalization of Aβ.
“More specifically, in cellular models, treatment with modulators or knocking out Sigma-2 receptor (S2R) constituents TMEM97 or the co-receptor PGRMC1 reduces the internalization of Aβ [27, 54].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [27] Izzo NJ, Staniszewski A, To L, Fa M, Teich AF, Saeed F et al (2014) Alzheimer’s therapeutics targeting amyloid beta 1–42 oligomers I: Abeta 42 oligomer binding to specific neuronal receptors is displaced by drug candidates that improve cognitive deficits. PLoS ONE 9:e111898. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0111898 source
- cites [54] Riad A, Lengyel-Zhand Z, Zeng C, Weng C-C, Lee VM-Y, Trojanowski JQ et al (2020) The sigma-2 receptor/TMEM97, PGRMC1, and LDL receptor complex are responsible for the cellular uptake of Aβ42 and its protein aggregates. Mol Neurobiol 57:3803–3813. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12035-020-01988-1 source
- Premisecitation
In an animal model with Alzheimer's-like plaque deposition, TMEM97 (Sigma-2) modulators improved cognitive deficits.
“In an animal model with Alzheimer’s-like plaque deposition, TMEM97 (Sigma-2) modulators improved cognitive deficits [27, 77].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [27] Izzo NJ, Staniszewski A, To L, Fa M, Teich AF, Saeed F et al (2014) Alzheimer’s therapeutics targeting amyloid beta 1–42 oligomers I: Abeta 42 oligomer binding to specific neuronal receptors is displaced by drug candidates that improve cognitive deficits. PLoS ONE 9:e111898. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0111898 source
- cites [77] Yi B, Sahn JJ, Ardestani PM, Evans AK, Scott L, Chan JZ et al (2017) Small molecule modulator of sigma 2 receptor is neuroprotective and reduces cognitive deficits and neuro-inflammation in experimental models of Alzheimer’s disease. J Neurochem 140:561–575. https://doi.org/10.1111/jnc.13917 source
- Study design and conductown data
The FRET quantification allowed detection only when both donor and acceptor were present in synapses and within approximately 10nm of each other.
“This quantification allowed us to detect FRET only when both donor and acceptor were present in synapses and within approximately 10nm of each other.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Aβ has multiple synaptic binding partners at synapses of Alzheimer's cases.
“reinforces the idea of multiple synaptic binding partners of Aβ at the synapses of Alzheimer’s cases”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Astrocytes play an important role in protecting synapses and ultimately cognition.
“further supporting an important role for astrocytes in protecting synapses and ultimately cognition”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductnone given
The cells after 24 h of pre-incubation with human brain homogenate did not appear as healthy as the cells which had acute treatment.
“the cells after 24 h of pre-incubation with human brain homogenate did not appear as healthy as the cells which had acute treatment”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
TMEM97 is a synaptic binding partner for Aβ either directly or indirectly.
“This supports the idea that TMEM97 is a synaptic binding partner for Aβ either directly or indirectly”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Data suggest a role for CT1812 in modulating inflammatory pathways, perhaps indirectly by glia.
“Together, data suggest a role for CT1812 in modulating inflammatory pathways, perhaps indirectly by glia”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
The data represent a context of cortical neuron and astrocyte interaction.
“data therefore represents a context of cortical neuron and astrocyte interaction”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
Transcriptomic and functional data from human iPSC-derived neuronal cultures treated with soluble fraction of Alzheimer's brain homogenate with CT1812 support a synaptic localization and mechanism.
“transcriptomic and functional data from human iPSC-derived neuronal cultures treated with soluble fraction of Alzheimer’s brain homogenate with the Sigma-2 modulator CT1812 support a synaptic localization and mechanism”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Probably not a substantial claim. 65
- It may state two separate claims as one. 42
Probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationTMEM97 was recently identified as the gene that codes for the Sigma-2 receptor.
“TMEM97 was recently identified as the gene that codes for the Sigma-2 receptor [3].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [3] Alon A, Schmidt HR, Wood MD, Sahn JJ, Martin SF, Kruse AC (2017) Identification of the gene that codes for the σ2 receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 114:7160–7165. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1705154114 source
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
PremisecitationOther suggested Aβ binding partners at synapses include the α7-nicotinic receptor, Ephrin A4, PSD95 and LilrB2.
“Other suggested Aβ binding partners at synapses include the α7-nicotinic receptor [49], Ephrin A4 [73], PSD95 [35, 50, 52] and LilrB2 [32].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 5 sources checked- cites [49] Parri HR, Hernandez CM, Dineley KT (2011) Research update: Alpha7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor mechanisms in Alzheimer’s disease. Biochem Pharmacol 82:931–942. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcp.2011.06.039 source
- cites [73] Vargas LM, Leal N, Estrada LD, González A, Serrano F, Araya K et al (2014) EphA4 activation of c-Abl mediates synaptic loss and LTP blockade caused by amyloid-β oligomers. PLoS ONE 9:e92309. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0092309 source
- cites [35] Lacor PN, Buniel MC, Chang L, Fernandez SJ, Gong Y, Viola KL et al (2004) Synaptic targeting by Alzheimer’s-related amyloid beta oligomers. J Neurosci 24:10191–10200. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3432-04.2004 source
In “Clusters of ADDL binding sites are coincident with synapses” (page unavailable), the paper reports that Aβ oligomer binding sites colocalize with PSD-95 at synapses. It treats PSD-95 as a synaptic marker, not an established Aβ binding partner; the Discussion (page unavailable) says the identity of the binding sites remains unknown. The citation is attached to PSD-95, so the other proteins in the sentence are not assessed here. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [50] Pham E, Crews L, Ubhi K, Hansen L, Adame A, Cartier A et al (2010) Progressive accumulation of amyloid-beta oligomers in Alzheimer’s disease and in amyloid precursor protein transgenic mice is accompanied by selective alterations in synaptic scaffold proteins. FEBS J 277:3051–3067. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-4658.2010.07719.x source
- cites [52] Pickett EK, Koffie RM, Wegmann S, Henstridge CM, Herrmann AG, Colom-Cadena M et al (2016) Non-fibrillar oligomeric amyloid-β within synapses. J Alzheimers Dis 53:787–800. https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-160007 source
Probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationSigma-2 modulators including CT1812 can improve cognitive deficits in a mouse model of Alzheimer's.
“In the context of Alzheimer’s, in 2014, Izzo and colleagues found that Sigma-2 modulators including CT1812 could displace Aβ synthetic oligomers from their synaptic receptors in cellular models and could improve cognitive deficits in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s [27].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [27] Izzo NJ, Staniszewski A, To L, Fa M, Teich AF, Saeed F et al (2014) Alzheimer’s therapeutics targeting amyloid beta 1–42 oligomers I: Abeta 42 oligomer binding to specific neuronal receptors is displaced by drug candidates that improve cognitive deficits. PLoS ONE 9:e111898. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0111898 source
The Results sections on neuronal binding and in vivo efficacy report that sigma-2/PGRMC1-targeting compounds displaced synthetic Aβ oligomers from neuronal cultures and improved memory deficits in transgenic Alzheimer’s-model mice. The compounds named for these findings include CT0093, CT0109, CT01344 and CT01346; our copy does not identify CT1812 as one of them. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationThe most studied binding partner of Aβ is PrPc, which through a cascade involving a complex with mGluR5 may lead to toxicity independently or via tau.
“The most studied binding partner is the PrPc, which through a cascade involving a complex with mGluR5 may lead to toxicity independently or via tau [37, 62, 72, 79].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 3 sources checked- cites [37] Laurén J, Gimbel DA, Nygaard HB, Gilbert JW, Strittmatter SM (2009) Cellular prion protein mediates impairment of synaptic plasticity by amyloid-β oligomers. Nature 457:1128–1132. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07761 source
The paper reports that PrPC binds Aβ42 oligomers and is required for their inhibition of hippocampal long-term potentiation (Abstract; page not specified). It proposes a downstream signaling cascade and a putative co-receptor, but does not identify mGluR5 or describe a tau-dependent or tau-independent route. It also does not establish that PrPC is the most studied Aβ binding partner. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [62] Smith LM, Kostylev MA, Lee S, Strittmatter SM (2019) Systematic and standardized comparison of reported amyloid-β receptors for sufficiency, affinity, and Alzheimer’s disease relevance. J Biol Chem 294:6042–6053. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.RA118.006252 source
- cites [72] Um JW, Kaufman AC, Kostylev M, Heiss JK, Stagi M, Takahashi H et al (2013) Metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 is a coreceptor for Alzheimer aβ oligomer bound to cellular prion protein. Neuron 79:887–902. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2013.06.036 source
The Introduction and Discussion identify PrPC as an Aβ oligomer binding partner and report that the Aβo–PrPC–mGluR5 complex contributes to dendritic spine loss and impaired neuronal function. The Discussion notes that Fyn binds Tau but presents implications beyond glutamate-receptor dysregulation as a possibility, not an established route to toxicity. The paper also does not establish that PrPC is the most studied Aβ binding partner. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
PremisecitationIzzo and colleagues found an improvement of cognition in mice exhibiting more than 80% estimated receptor occupancy.
“Izzo and colleagues found an improvement of cognition in mice exhibiting more than 80% estimated receptor occupancy”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [27] Izzo NJ, Staniszewski A, To L, Fa M, Teich AF, Saeed F et al (2014) Alzheimer’s therapeutics targeting amyloid beta 1–42 oligomers I: Abeta 42 oligomer binding to specific neuronal receptors is displaced by drug candidates that improve cognitive deficits. PLoS ONE 9:e111898. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0111898 source
Probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationAβ oligomers have been shown to bind saturably to a single site, suggesting specific pharmacological interactions with receptors.
“Further, while Aβ fibrils bind non-specifically to a variety of surfaces, and Aβ monomers bind to several receptors when applied exogenously [5], Aβ oligomers have been shown to bind saturably to a single site[27, 62] suggesting specific pharmacological interactions with receptors.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [27] Izzo NJ, Staniszewski A, To L, Fa M, Teich AF, Saeed F et al (2014) Alzheimer’s therapeutics targeting amyloid beta 1–42 oligomers I: Abeta 42 oligomer binding to specific neuronal receptors is displaced by drug candidates that improve cognitive deficits. PLoS ONE 9:e111898. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0111898 source
- cites [62] Smith LM, Kostylev MA, Lee S, Strittmatter SM (2019) Systematic and standardized comparison of reported amyloid-β receptors for sufficiency, affinity, and Alzheimer’s disease relevance. J Biol Chem 294:6042–6053. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.RA118.006252 source
It may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataThe density of TMEM97 objects was significantly higher in Alzheimer's than control cases (fold increase: 1.56; effect of disease F[1,19.36] = 4.41, p = 0.049, no significant sex differences).
“The density of TMEM97 objects was significantly higher in Alzheimer’s than control cases (fold increase: 1.56; effect of disease F[1,19.36] = 4.41, p = 0.049, no significant sex differences).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataBody weight was different between male and female mice with males being heavier (F[1, 36] = 62.33, p < 0.0001).
“Body weight, which could affect drug uptake, did not differ between treatment groups (F[1, 36] = 0.74, p = 0.40), but body weight was different between male and female mice with males being heavier (F[1, 36] = 62.33, p < 0.0001).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataThere was no treatment:sex interaction in analysis of body weight nor a significant difference in the numbers of male vs female mice in the different treatment groups (Fisher test p = 1, 95% CI = 0.30, 5.04).
“There was no treatment:sex interaction in analysis of body weight nor was there a significant difference in the numbers of male vs female mice in the different treatment groups (Fisher test p = 1, 95% CI = 0.30, 5.04).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataPre-incubation with homogenate for 24 h before CT1812 or vehicle treatment induced a significant interaction between Aβ status of the homogenate and drug treatment (F[1,257] = 9.06, p = 0.003) with a significant decrease in peak frequency between Aβ-incubation followed by vehicle treatment and Aβ + followed by CT1812 treatment.
“Pre-incubation with homogenate for 24 h before CT1812 or vehicle treatment induced a significant interaction between Aβ status of the homogenate and drug treatment (F[1,257] = 9.06, p = 0.003) with a significant decrease in peak frequency between Aβ–incubation followed by vehicle treatment and Aβ + followed by CT1812 treatment.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataCT1812 did not statistically significantly influence the overall densities of Aβ, TMEM97 or PSD95 nor the synaptic localization of Aβ and/or TMEM97.
“CT1812 did not statistically significantly influence the overall densities of Aβ, TMEM97 or PSD95 nor the synaptic localization of Aβ and/or TMEM97 (Fig. 4A,C,E).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
FindingcitationWith our technique, we do not observe somatic labelling of PSD95, rather we observe discrete puncta that are opposed to presynaptic terminal labelling.
“There will be synaptic protein in cell bodies of neurons where they are produced before transport to synapses; however, with our technique, we do not observe somatic labelling of PSD95, rather we observe discrete puncta that are opposed to presynaptic terminal labelling [12].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [12] Colom-Cadena M, Davies C, Sirisi S, Lee J-E, Simzer EM, Tzioras M et al (2023) Synaptic oligomeric tau in Alzheimer’s disease—a potential culprit in the spread of tau pathology through the brain. Neuron 111:2170-2183.e6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2023.04.020 source
- Rests on an assumption: There will be synaptic protein in cell bodies of neurons where they are produced before transport to synapses.
It may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataMale APP/PS1 + Tau mice had an average of 85.13 ± 6.4% estimated receptor occupancy, while females had an average of 69.69 ± 11% (β = 15.44; p < 0.001).
“Male APP/PS1 + Tau mice had an average of 85.13 ± 6.4% estimated receptor occupancy, while females had an average of 69.69 ± 11% (β = 15.44; p < 0.001, Fig. 4B).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataTreatment of the Alzheimer's mouse model with TMEM97 modulators did not result in a recovery of synaptic densities nor a decrease of Aβ synaptic localization.
“the treatment of the Alzheimer’s mouse model with TMEM97 modulators did not result in a recovery of synaptic densities nor a decrease of Aβ synaptic localization”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataSTRING protein interaction analysis of Aβ + Drug vs. Aβ + Vehicle conditions (unadjusted p < 0.05) confirmed the findings of TMEM97 localization to synapses. The top 8 GO Components (sorted by strength) were involved in synaptic biology.
“STRING (Version 11.5) protein interaction analysis of Aβ + Drug vs. Aβ + Vehicle conditions (unadjusted p value < 0.05) confirmed the findings of TMEM97 localization to synapses. The top 8 GO Components (sorted by strength) were involved in synaptic biology (Fig. 5G).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataIn post synapses, FRET was observed between Aβ and PrPc, between TMEM97 and PGRMC1, and between TMEM97 and PrPc.
“In post synapses, we also observed FRET between Aβ and PrPc—which has also been observed to bind Aβ in model systems[62]—and between TMEM97 and PGRMC1 which are known to be binding partners in vitro and in human cases [55], and between TMEM97 and PrPc (Fig. 3).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [62] Smith LM, Kostylev MA, Lee S, Strittmatter SM (2019) Systematic and standardized comparison of reported amyloid-β receptors for sufficiency, affinity, and Alzheimer’s disease relevance. J Biol Chem 294:6042–6053. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.RA118.006252 source
- cites [55] Riad A, Zeng C, Weng C-C, Winters H, Xu K, Makvandi M et al (2018) Sigma-2 receptor/TMEM97 and PGRMC-1 increase the rate of internalization of LDL by LDL receptor through the formation of a ternary complex. Sci Rep 8:16845. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-35430-3 source
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Findingown dataThere were no sex effects in the proportion of synapses containing TMEM97.
“There were no sex effects in the proportion of synapses containing TMEM97.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Findingown dataNeurons were active in all conditions.
“Images of GCaMP6 fluorescence show that neurons were active in all conditions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataThe difference between Aβ− and Aβ + homogenate was much smaller with only 7 differentially expressed genes (adjusted p value < 0.05), 3 upregulated and 4 downregulated.
“The difference between Aβ− and Aβ + homogenate was much smaller with only 7 differentially expressed genes (adjusted p value < 0.05), 3 upregulated and 4 downregulated (Fig. 5D).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataSeveral of the transcripts regulated by CT1812 are expressed in astrocytes, which are observed in small numbers in our cultures (averaging 16% GFAP positive cells in the 200 day old cultures used).
“Several of the transcripts regulated by CT1812 are expressed in astrocytes, which are observed in small numbers in our cultures (averaging 16% GFAP positive cells in the 200 day old cultures used, Fig. 5F).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
FindingcitationPost-synaptic terminal density was reduced in AD (7% reduction in PSD density F[1,28.73] = 4.36, p = 0.046, no significant sex differences).
“As previously described [34], post-synaptic terminal density was reduced in AD (Fig. 1B, 7% reduction in PSD density F[1,28.73] = 4.36, p = 0.046, no significant sex differences).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [34] Koffie RM, Hashimoto T, Tai H-C, Kay KR, Serrano-Pozo A, Joyner D et al (2012) Apolipoprotein E4 effects in Alzheimer’s disease are mediated by synaptotoxic oligomeric amyloid-β. Brain 135:2155–2168. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/aws127 source
It may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataCT1812 treatment in transgenic mice did not change plaque burdens but did reduce astrogliosis in hippocampus.
“CT1812 treatment in transgenic mice did not change plaque burdens but did reduce astrogliosis in hippocampus (Supplementary Fig S4).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataFRET experiments confirm close proximity within synapses of Aβ and TMEM97, Aβ and PrPc, TMEM97 and PrPc, TMEM97 and PGRMC1 and Aβ and PSD95, but not PSD95 and synaptophysin or PSD95 and PGRMC1.
“In summary, our FRET experiments confirm close proximity within synapses of Aβ and TMEM97, Aβ and PrPc, TMEM97 and PrPc, TMEM97 and PGRMC1 and Aβ and PSD95, but not PSD95 and synaptophysin or PSD95 and PGRMC1, which are robust as both technical and biological negative controls do not show FRET signal.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataThere was a significant interaction between disease and sex in the proportion of synapses with Aβ (disease*sex interaction F[1,21.86] = 5.1, p = 0.034) with female subjects having more synaptic Aβ.
“Interestingly, there was a significant interaction between disease and sex in the proportion of synapses with Aβ (disease* sex interaction F[1,21.86] = 5.1, p = 0.034) with female subjects having more synaptic Aβ.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataBoth human brain homogenate treated groups are lower than the control (vehicle treatment; p < 0.0001), indicating that exposure to human brain homogenate affects cell function.
“However, both human brain homogenate treated groups are lower than the control (vehicle treatment; Tukey-corrected post-hoc test after linear mixed effects model, p < 0.0001) indicating that exposure to human brain homogenate affects cell function.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Findingown dataIn the cultures studied, ~16% of cells were GFAP+ astrocytes.
“In the cultures studied, ~ 16% of cells were GFAP + astrocytes”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataThe top gene ontology terms important are synaptic and include post-synaptic density and post-synaptic membrane.
“the top gene ontology terms important are synaptic and include post-synaptic density and post-synaptic membrane”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
PremisecitationSigma-2 receptor ligands prevent neurodegeneration in a worm model expressing human amyloid precursor protein.
“Yi et al.and Mondal et al.similarly found that Sigma-2 receptor ligands prevent neurodegeneration in a worm model expressing human amyloid precursor protein [44, 77].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [44] Mondal S, Hegarty E, Sahn JJ, Scott LL, Gökçe SK, Martin C et al (2018) High-content microfluidic screening platform used to identify σ2R/Tmem97 binding ligands that reduce age-dependent neurodegeneration in C. elegans SC_APP model. ACS Chem Neurosci 9:1014–1026. https://doi.org/10.1021/acschemneuro.7b00428 source
- cites [77] Yi B, Sahn JJ, Ardestani PM, Evans AK, Scott L, Chan JZ et al (2017) Small molecule modulator of sigma 2 receptor is neuroprotective and reduces cognitive deficits and neuro-inflammation in experimental models of Alzheimer’s disease. J Neurochem 140:561–575. https://doi.org/10.1111/jnc.13917 source
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
PremisecitationChanges in non-neuronal cells are important in Alzheimer's disease pathogenesis.
“While it is clear that toxicity of tau and changes in non-neuronal cells are also important in disease pathogenesis [24], substantial evidence supports an important role for Aβ in synaptotoxicity early in the disease process in Alzheimer’s [38].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [24] Henstridge CM, Hyman BT, Spires-Jones TL (2019) Beyond the neuron–cellular interactions early in Alzheimer disease pathogenesis. Nat Rev Neurosci 20:94–108. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41583-018-0113-1 source
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationSigma-2 receptors have been studied for more than four decades and are drug targets for several conditions including cancer, pain and diverse CNS disorders.
“Sigma-2 receptors have been studied for more than four decades and are drug targets for several conditions including cancer, pain and diverse CNS disorders [22, 58]; and most notably, a Sigma-2 modulator, CT1812, is in clinical development in Phase 2 trials for Alzheimer’s disease and dementia with Lewy bodies [11, 21].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [22] Guo L, Zhen X (2015) Sigma-2 receptor ligands: neurobiological effects. Curr Med Chem 22:989–1003. https://doi.org/10.2174/0929867322666150114163607 source
- cites [58] Schmidt HR, Kruse AC (2019) The molecular function of σ receptors: past, present, and future. Trends Pharmacol Sci 40:636–654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tips.2019.07.006 source
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
Premisenone givenThe study of synapses in the human brain represents a technical challenge due to their small volumes, which are smaller than the diffraction limit of light microscopy, making colocalization studies difficult.
“The study of synapses in the human brain represents a technical challenge due to their small volumes, which are smaller than the diffraction limit of light microscopy, making colocalization studies difficult.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationSynaptic Aβ binding partners have been identified in cell culture systems and mouse models.
“Synaptic Aβ binding partners have been identified in cell culture systems and mouse models, but their human relevance is still debated (reviewed in [5, 30, 46, 63]).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 4 sources checked- cites [5] Benilova I, De Strooper B (2013) Promiscuous Alzheimer’s amyloid: yet another partner. Science 341:1354–1355. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1244166 source
- cites [30] Jarosz-Griffiths HH, Noble E, Rushworth JV, Hooper NM (2016) Amyloid-β receptors: the good, the bad, and the prion protein. J Biol Chem 291:3174–3183. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.R115.702704 source
- cites [46] Mroczko B, Groblewska M, Litman-Zawadzka A, Kornhuber J, Lewczuk P (2018) Cellular receptors of amyloid β oligomers (AβOs) in Alzheimer’s disease. Int J Mol Sci 19:1884. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19071884 source
- cites [63] Smith LM, Strittmatter SM (2017) Binding sites for amyloid-β oligomers and synaptic toxicity. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med 7:a024075. https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a024075 source
Probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationSigma-2 modulators including CT1812 can displace Aβ synthetic oligomers from their synaptic receptors in cellular models.
“In the context of Alzheimer’s, in 2014, Izzo and colleagues found that Sigma-2 modulators including CT1812 could displace Aβ synthetic oligomers from their synaptic receptors in cellular models and could improve cognitive deficits in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s [27].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [27] Izzo NJ, Staniszewski A, To L, Fa M, Teich AF, Saeed F et al (2014) Alzheimer’s therapeutics targeting amyloid beta 1–42 oligomers I: Abeta 42 oligomer binding to specific neuronal receptors is displaced by drug candidates that improve cognitive deficits. PLoS ONE 9:e111898. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0111898 source
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
PremisecitationTMEM97 is believed to be a key player of cholesterol homeostasis.
“TMEM97, initially known as MAC30 [47], is overexpressed in some cancers and it is believed to be a key player of cholesterol homeostasis [78] and calcium regulation [8, 74, 77].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [78] Zeng C, Weng C-C, Schneider ME, Puentes L, Riad A, Xu K et al (2019) TMEM97 and PGRMC1 do not mediate sigma-2 ligand-induced cell death. Cell Death Discovery 5:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41420-019-0141-2 source
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
PremisecitationToxicity of tau is important in Alzheimer's disease pathogenesis.
“While it is clear that toxicity of tau and changes in non-neuronal cells are also important in disease pathogenesis [24], substantial evidence supports an important role for Aβ in synaptotoxicity early in the disease process in Alzheimer’s [38].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [24] Henstridge CM, Hyman BT, Spires-Jones TL (2019) Beyond the neuron–cellular interactions early in Alzheimer disease pathogenesis. Nat Rev Neurosci 20:94–108. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41583-018-0113-1 source
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
PremisecitationCellular prion protein (PrPc) is the most studied Aβ binding candidate at synapses, either alone or through a complex with mGluR5.
“Among the Aβ binding candidates, cellular prion protein (PrPc) represents the most studied, either alone or through a complex with mGluR5 [37, 62, 72, 79].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 4 sources checked- cites [37] Laurén J, Gimbel DA, Nygaard HB, Gilbert JW, Strittmatter SM (2009) Cellular prion protein mediates impairment of synaptic plasticity by amyloid-β oligomers. Nature 457:1128–1132. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07761 source
- cites [62] Smith LM, Kostylev MA, Lee S, Strittmatter SM (2019) Systematic and standardized comparison of reported amyloid-β receptors for sufficiency, affinity, and Alzheimer’s disease relevance. J Biol Chem 294:6042–6053. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.RA118.006252 source
- cites [72] Um JW, Kaufman AC, Kostylev M, Heiss JK, Stagi M, Takahashi H et al (2013) Metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 is a coreceptor for Alzheimer aβ oligomer bound to cellular prion protein. Neuron 79:887–902. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2013.06.036 source
- cites [79] Zhang Y, Zhao Y, Zhang L, Yu W, Wang Y, Chang W (2019) Cellular prion protein as a receptor of toxic amyloid-β42 oligomers is important for Alzheimer’s disease. Front Cell Neurosci 13:339. https://doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2019.00339 source
Probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationThe human relevance of synaptic Aβ binding partners identified in cell culture systems and mouse models is still debated.
“Synaptic Aβ binding partners have been identified in cell culture systems and mouse models, but their human relevance is still debated (reviewed in [5, 30, 46, 63]).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 4 sources checked- cites [5] Benilova I, De Strooper B (2013) Promiscuous Alzheimer’s amyloid: yet another partner. Science 341:1354–1355. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1244166 source
- cites [30] Jarosz-Griffiths HH, Noble E, Rushworth JV, Hooper NM (2016) Amyloid-β receptors: the good, the bad, and the prion protein. J Biol Chem 291:3174–3183. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.R115.702704 source
- cites [46] Mroczko B, Groblewska M, Litman-Zawadzka A, Kornhuber J, Lewczuk P (2018) Cellular receptors of amyloid β oligomers (AβOs) in Alzheimer’s disease. Int J Mol Sci 19:1884. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19071884 source
- cites [63] Smith LM, Strittmatter SM (2017) Binding sites for amyloid-β oligomers and synaptic toxicity. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med 7:a024075. https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a024075 source
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationIn model systems, Aβ is often overexpressed or applied exogenously, and due to the 'sticky' nature of Aβ oligomers, this can result in false positive signals for interacting partners.
“Further, in model systems, Aβ is often overexpressed or applied exogenously, and due to the “sticky” nature of Aβ oligomers, this can result in false positive signals for interacting partners, which has been highlighted as a problem for translation in the field [5].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [5] Benilova I, De Strooper B (2013) Promiscuous Alzheimer’s amyloid: yet another partner. Science 341:1354–1355. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1244166 source
It may state two separate claims as one.
Interpretationown dataTMEM97 is a potential Aβ synaptic binding partner in human Alzheimer's disease brain, where it may mediate synaptotoxicity.
“These data support a role for transmembrane protein 97 in the synaptic binding of Aβ in human Alzheimer’s disease brain where it may mediate synaptotoxicity.”
- Also stated in: § Introduction · boosted
“We demonstrate that TMEM97 is a potential Aβ synaptic binding partner in human brain tissue and confirms that Sigma-2 receptor complex allosteric modulator CT1812 can reduce interactions between TMEM97 and Aβ in vivo.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § Introduction · boosted
It may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationArray tomography allows a 70nm axial resolution, which enables the identification of single synaptic terminals in three dimensions.
“Array tomography allows us to reach a 70nm axial resolution, which enables the identification of single synaptic terminals in three dimensions [31].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [31] Kay KR, Smith C, Wright AK, Serrano-Pozo A, Pooler AM, Koffie R et al (2013) Studying synapses in human brain with array tomography and electron microscopy. Nat Protoc 8:1366–1380. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2013.078 source
Probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationThe mechanism(s) underlying synapse degeneration are still largely unknown.
“The mechanism(s) underlying synapse degeneration, however, are still largely unknown [10].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [10] Chen Y, Fu AKY, Ip NY (2019) Synaptic dysfunction in Alzheimer’s disease: mechanisms and therapeutic strategies. Pharmacol Ther 195:186–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pharmthera.2018.11.006 source
Probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationThe TMEM97/PGRMC1/LDLR complex may control the internalization of monomers and oligomers of Aβ.
“Linking this function to Alzheimer’s, in cellular models, TMEM97 has recently been shown to form a ternary complex with Progesterone receptor membrane component 1 (PGRMC1) and LDLR [55] that may control the internalization of monomers and oligomers of Aβ [54].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [54] Riad A, Lengyel-Zhand Z, Zeng C, Weng C-C, Lee VM-Y, Trojanowski JQ et al (2020) The sigma-2 receptor/TMEM97, PGRMC1, and LDL receptor complex are responsible for the cellular uptake of Aβ42 and its protein aggregates. Mol Neurobiol 57:3803–3813. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12035-020-01988-1 source
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
PremisecitationA Sigma-2 modulator, CT1812, is in clinical development in Phase 2 trials for Alzheimer's disease and dementia with Lewy bodies.
“Sigma-2 receptors have been studied for more than four decades and are drug targets for several conditions including cancer, pain and diverse CNS disorders [22, 58]; and most notably, a Sigma-2 modulator, CT1812, is in clinical development in Phase 2 trials for Alzheimer’s disease and dementia with Lewy bodies [11, 21].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [11] Cognition Therapeutics (2020) A Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, phase 2 study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of CT1812 in subjects with mild to moderate Alzheimer’s disease. https://iadrp.nia.nih.gov/project/randomized-double-blind-placebo-controlled-parallel-group-phase-ii-study-evaluate-safety-1
- cites [21] Grundman M, Morgan R, Lickliter JD, Schneider LS, DeKosky S, Izzo NJ et al (2019) A phase 1 clinical trial of the sigma-2 receptor complex allosteric antagonist CT1812, a novel therapeutic candidate for Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement (N Y) 5:20–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trci.2018.11.001 source
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
PremisecitationTMEM97 is believed to be a key player of calcium regulation.
“TMEM97, initially known as MAC30 [47], is overexpressed in some cancers and it is believed to be a key player of cholesterol homeostasis [78] and calcium regulation [8, 74, 77].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [8] Cassano G, Gasparre G, Niso M, Contino M, Scalera V, Colabufo NA (2009) F281, synthetic agonist of the sigma-2 receptor, induces Ca2+ efflux from the endoplasmic reticulum and mitochondria in SK-N-SH cells. Cell Calcium 45:340–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceca.2008.12.005 source
- cites [74] Vilner BJ, Bowen WD (2000) Modulation of cellular calcium by sigma-2 receptors: release from intracellular stores in human SK-N-SH neuroblastoma cells. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 292:900–911 source
- cites [77] Yi B, Sahn JJ, Ardestani PM, Evans AK, Scott L, Chan JZ et al (2017) Small molecule modulator of sigma 2 receptor is neuroprotective and reduces cognitive deficits and neuro-inflammation in experimental models of Alzheimer’s disease. J Neurochem 140:561–575. https://doi.org/10.1111/jnc.13917 source
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationDrug concentrations above 80% estimated receptor occupancy are effective and concentrations lower than 60% were ineffective.
“Since it has been reported that drug concentrations above 80% estimated receptor occupancy are effective and concentrations lower than 60% were ineffective [27], the effect on synaptic TMEM97 and Aβ localization was studied on the mice that reached an 80% estimated receptor occupancy threshold (n = 5 APP/PS1 + Tau mice, Table S1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [27] Izzo NJ, Staniszewski A, To L, Fa M, Teich AF, Saeed F et al (2014) Alzheimer’s therapeutics targeting amyloid beta 1–42 oligomers I: Abeta 42 oligomer binding to specific neuronal receptors is displaced by drug candidates that improve cognitive deficits. PLoS ONE 9:e111898. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0111898 source
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
PremisecitationThe study of synaptic binding partners of Aβ yielded many candidates.
“The study of synaptic binding partners of Aβ yielded many candidates—reviewed in [30, 46, 63].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [30] Jarosz-Griffiths HH, Noble E, Rushworth JV, Hooper NM (2016) Amyloid-β receptors: the good, the bad, and the prion protein. J Biol Chem 291:3174–3183. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.R115.702704 source
- cites [46] Mroczko B, Groblewska M, Litman-Zawadzka A, Kornhuber J, Lewczuk P (2018) Cellular receptors of amyloid β oligomers (AβOs) in Alzheimer’s disease. Int J Mol Sci 19:1884. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19071884 source
- cites [63] Smith LM, Strittmatter SM (2017) Binding sites for amyloid-β oligomers and synaptic toxicity. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med 7:a024075. https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a024075 source
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
Study design and conductnone givenLaser and detector settings were maintained through the whole study avoiding major saturation.
“Laser and detector settings were maintained through the whole study avoiding major saturation, which is only applied in figures for image visualization purposes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Study design and conductreasoningWith the current methodology, we cannot conclusively determine the proportion of Aβ bound to each potential receptor in synapses.
“With the current methodology, we cannot conclusively determine the proportion of Aβ bound to each potential receptor in synapses”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Study design and conductcitationThe linear mixed effects model including only diagnosis as a fixed effect and sample nested in case as a random effect was the best fit for the data as assessed with the Akaike Information Criteria (AIC).
“The linear mixed effects model including only diagnosis as a fixed effect and sample nested in case as a random effect was the best fit for the data as assessed with the Akaike Information Criteria (AIC) [9].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [9] Cavanaugh JE, Neath AA (2019) The Akaike information criterion: background, derivation, properties, application, interpretation, and refinements. WIREs Comput Stat 11:e1460. https://doi.org/10.1002/wics.1460 source
It may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationThe combination of array tomography with FRET enhances the lateral resolution to ~10 nm in the selected single synaptic terminals allowing us to determine whether proteins are close enough to be interacting.
“The combination of array tomography with FRET enhances the lateral resolution to ~ 10 nm in the selected single synaptic terminals allowing us to determine whether proteins are close enough to be interacting [23, 52].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [23] Hellenkamp B, Schmid S, Doroshenko O, Opanasyuk O, Kühnemuth R, Rezaei Adariani S et al (2018) Precision and accuracy of single-molecule FRET measurements-a multi-laboratory benchmark study. Nat Methods 15:669–676. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-018-0085-0 source
- cites [52] Pickett EK, Koffie RM, Wegmann S, Henstridge CM, Herrmann AG, Colom-Cadena M et al (2016) Non-fibrillar oligomeric amyloid-β within synapses. J Alzheimers Dis 53:787–800. https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-160007 source
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Study design and conductreasoningBoth Braak stage and Thal phase were higher in AD than control group due to the inclusion criteria for the groups (p < 0.01 Fisher's exact tests).
“Both Braak stage and Thal phase were higher in AD than control group due to our inclusion criteria for the groups (p < 0.01 Fisher’s exact tests).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Study design and conductown dataThe structural state of Aβ labelled with 6E10 antibody (monomer, oligomer or fibril) recognised in the present array tomography studies is not clear, which is a limitation of the study.
“The structural state of Aβ labelled with 6E10 antibody(monomer, oligomer or fibril) recognised in the present array tomography studies is not clear, which is a limitation of the study, but we have confirmed the interaction of TMEM7 with NAB61, an antibody that preferentially recognises fibrillar oligomers and reacts with synaptic oligomeric Aβ [34].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [34] Koffie RM, Hashimoto T, Tai H-C, Kay KR, Serrano-Pozo A, Joyner D et al (2012) Apolipoprotein E4 effects in Alzheimer’s disease are mediated by synaptotoxic oligomeric amyloid-β. Brain 135:2155–2168. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/aws127 source
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Study design and conductnone givenMice of both sexes were randomised into vehicle or control groups.
“Mice of both sexes were randomised into vehicle or control groups.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim.
Interpretationnone givenWithin the limitations of the technique, we are able to observe proximity of synaptic proteins to a degree that has not previously been possible within human synapses.
“Within the limitations of the technique, we are able to observe proximity of synaptic proteins to a degree that has not previously been possible within human synapses.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationCT1812 selectively displaces Aβ oligomers, but not monomer, from synaptic receptor sites and facilitates its clearance out of the brain.
“CT1812 has been previously demonstrated to selectively displace Aβ oligomers, but not monomer, from synaptic receptor sites and facilitate its clearance out of the brain [27]”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [27] Izzo NJ, Staniszewski A, To L, Fa M, Teich AF, Saeed F et al (2014) Alzheimer’s therapeutics targeting amyloid beta 1–42 oligomers I: Abeta 42 oligomer binding to specific neuronal receptors is displaced by drug candidates that improve cognitive deficits. PLoS ONE 9:e111898. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0111898 source
Probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationThe 80% estimated receptor occupancy is the drug concentration threshold previously defined as effective.
“the drug concentration threshold previously defined as effective [27]”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [27] Izzo NJ, Staniszewski A, To L, Fa M, Teich AF, Saeed F et al (2014) Alzheimer’s therapeutics targeting amyloid beta 1–42 oligomers I: Abeta 42 oligomer binding to specific neuronal receptors is displaced by drug candidates that improve cognitive deficits. PLoS ONE 9:e111898. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0111898 source
Probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationAβ can be found in synapses of Alzheimer's cases.
“It has been shown that Aβ can be found in synapses of Alzheimer’s cases [6, 29, 34, 51, 65, 66], but the mechanisms by which Aβ induces synaptic toxicity remain unclear.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [6] Bilousova T, Miller CA, Poon WW, Vinters HV, Corrada M, Kawas C et al (2016) Synaptic amyloid-β oligomers precede p-tau and differentiate high pathology control cases. Am J Pathol 186:185–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajpath.2015.09.018 source
- cites [29] Jackson RJ, Rose J, Tulloch J, Henstridge C, Smith C, Spires-Jones TL (2019) Clusterin accumulates in synapses in Alzheimer’s disease and is increased in apolipoprotein E4 carriers. Brain Commun 1:fcz003. https://doi.org/10.1093/braincomms/fcz003 source
- cites [34] Koffie RM, Hashimoto T, Tai H-C, Kay KR, Serrano-Pozo A, Joyner D et al (2012) Apolipoprotein E4 effects in Alzheimer’s disease are mediated by synaptotoxic oligomeric amyloid-β. Brain 135:2155–2168. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/aws127 source
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
Study design and conductnone givenMice were randomly assigned to treatment groups and treated by blinded experimenters.
“Mice were randomly assigned to treatment groups and treated by blinded experimenters.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationTMEM97 (Sigma-2) has been previously linked to Alzheimer's, through in vitro and in vivo pharmacological modulation studies and with regard to a change in expression levels on synapses in Alzheimer's patients.
“TMEM97 (Sigma-2) has been previously linked to Alzheimer’s, through in vitro and in vivo pharmacological modulation studies and with regard to a change in expression levels on synapses in Alzheimer’s patients.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationDue its hydrophobic nature, Aβ binds to lipid membranes interrupting membrane fluidity and destabilizing several membrane receptors.
“Due its hydrophobic nature, Aβ binds to lipid membranes interrupting membrane fluidity and destabilizing several membrane receptors [38].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [38] Li S, Selkoe DJ (2020) A mechanistic hypothesis for the impairment of synaptic plasticity by soluble Aβ oligomers from Alzheimer’s brain. J Neurochem 154:583–597. https://doi.org/10.1111/jnc.15007 source
It may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationModulating TMEM97 with CT1812 and modulating PrPc rescue cognition in plaque-bearing transgenic mice.
“both modulating TMEM97 with CT1812 and modulating PrPc rescue cognition in plaque-bearing transgenic mice [15, 27]”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [15] Cox TO, Gunther EC, Brody AH, Chiasseu MT, Stoner A, Smith LM et al (2019) Anti-PrPC antibody rescues cognition and synapses in transgenic alzheimer mice. Ann Clin Transl Neurol 6:554–574. https://doi.org/10.1002/acn3.730 source
- cites [27] Izzo NJ, Staniszewski A, To L, Fa M, Teich AF, Saeed F et al (2014) Alzheimer’s therapeutics targeting amyloid beta 1–42 oligomers I: Abeta 42 oligomer binding to specific neuronal receptors is displaced by drug candidates that improve cognitive deficits. PLoS ONE 9:e111898. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0111898 source
It may state two separate claims as one.
Study design and conductown dataIncluding an interaction between sex and diagnosis was a better fit than without the interaction, and the final statistical model applied in the study was diagnosis*sex + (1|case/sample).
“Including an interaction between sex and diagnosis was a better fit than without the interaction, thus our final statistical model applied in the study was diagnosis*sex + (1|case/sample).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductcitationFor FRET analysis, donor-only (Cy3) and acceptor-only (Cy5) samples were imaged in each imaging session to calculate the donor-emission crosstalk with the acceptor emission (beta parameter) and the direct excitation of the acceptor by the donor excitation laser line (gamma parameter).
“For FRET analysis, donor-only (Cy3) and acceptor-only (Cy5) samples were imaged in each imaging session to calculate the donor-emission crosstalk with the acceptor emission (beta parameter) and the direct excitation of the acceptor by the donor excitation laser line (gamma parameter) [75, 80].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [75] Wouters FS, Verveer PJ, Bastiaens PI (2001) Imaging biochemistry inside cells. Trends Cell Biol 11:203–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0962-8924(01)01982-1 source
- cites [80] Zimmermann T (2019) Photobleaching and sensitized emission-based methods for the detection of förster resonance energy transfer. Methods Mol Biol 2040:235–274. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-9686-5_12 source
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationThe synapse is believed to be the earliest affected structure in the context of Alzheimer's and the best pathological correlate of the characteristic cognitive decline.
“Importantly, we found that this potential interaction may occur at the synapses, believed to be the earliest affected structure in the context of Alzheimer’s and the best pathological correlate of the characteristic cognitive decline [17, 56, 67].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [17] DeKosky ST, Scheff SW (1990) Synapse loss in frontal cortex biopsies in Alzheimer’s disease: correlation with cognitive severity. Ann Neurol 27:457–464. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.410270502 source
- cites [56] Scheff SW, Price DA, Schmitt FA, Mufson EJ (2006) Hippocampal synaptic loss in early Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment. Neurobiol Aging 27:1372–1384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2005.09.012 source
- cites [67] Terry RD, Masliah E, Salmon DP, Butters N, DeTeresa R, Hill R et al (1991) Physical basis of cognitive alterations in alzheimer’s disease: synapse loss is the major correlate of cognitive impairment. Ann Neurol 30:572–580. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.410300410 source
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
PremisecitationThe relationship between Aβ and synapses has been widely studied.
“The relationship between Aβ and synapses has been widely studied [19, 71].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [19] Forner S, Baglietto-Vargas D, Martini AC, Trujillo-Estrada L, LaFerla FM (2017) Synaptic impairment in Alzheimer’s disease: a dysregulated symphony. Trends Neurosci 40:347–357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2017.04.002 source
- cites [71] Tzioras M, McGeachan RI, Durrant CS, Spires-Jones TL (2023) Synaptic degeneration in Alzheimer disease. Nat Rev Neurol 19:19–38. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41582-022-00749-z source
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Study design and conductnone givenThe immunostaining, image acquisition, image processing and analyses were performed blinded to the clinicopathological diagnosis.
“The immunostaining, image acquisition, image processing and analyses were performed blinded to the clinicopathological diagnosis.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Study design and conductnone givenExperimenters administering jelly were blind to condition.
“Mice were weighed at the beginning of each week to determine the weight of jelly to be given for that week, and were dosed daily for one month with jelly containing vehicle or CT1812 10 mg/kg/day (experimenters administering jelly were blind to condition).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationMost binding partners have not been studied in human brain nor using human derived Aβ species.
“It is relevant to note that most binding partners have not been studied in human brain nor using human derived Aβ species [38, 63].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [38] Li S, Selkoe DJ (2020) A mechanistic hypothesis for the impairment of synaptic plasticity by soluble Aβ oligomers from Alzheimer’s brain. J Neurochem 154:583–597. https://doi.org/10.1111/jnc.15007 source
- cites [63] Smith LM, Strittmatter SM (2017) Binding sites for amyloid-β oligomers and synaptic toxicity. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med 7:a024075. https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a024075 source
It may state two separate claims as one.
Interpretationown dataIn Alzheimer's brain, TMEM97 levels were increased in synapses, and TMEM97 was found in close enough proximity to Aβ to be binding.
“In Alzheimer’s brain, TMEM97 levels were increased in synapses, and TMEM97 was found in close enough proximity to Aβ to be binding.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationAβ fibrils bind non-specifically to a variety of surfaces, and Aβ monomers bind to several receptors when applied exogenously.
“Further, while Aβ fibrils bind non-specifically to a variety of surfaces, and Aβ monomers bind to several receptors when applied exogenously [5], Aβ oligomers have been shown to bind saturably to a single site[27, 62] suggesting specific pharmacological interactions with receptors.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [5] Benilova I, De Strooper B (2013) Promiscuous Alzheimer’s amyloid: yet another partner. Science 341:1354–1355. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1244166 source
It may state two separate claims as one.
InterpretationcitationThis potential interaction may occur at the synapses, believed to be the earliest affected structure in the context of Alzheimer's and the best pathological correlate of the characteristic cognitive decline.
“Importantly, we found that this potential interaction may occur at the synapses, believed to be the earliest affected structure in the context of Alzheimer’s and the best pathological correlate of the characteristic cognitive decline [17, 56, 67].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [17] DeKosky ST, Scheff SW (1990) Synapse loss in frontal cortex biopsies in Alzheimer’s disease: correlation with cognitive severity. Ann Neurol 27:457–464. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.410270502 source
- cites [56] Scheff SW, Price DA, Schmitt FA, Mufson EJ (2006) Hippocampal synaptic loss in early Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment. Neurobiol Aging 27:1372–1384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2005.09.012 source
- cites [67] Terry RD, Masliah E, Salmon DP, Butters N, DeTeresa R, Hill R et al (1991) Physical basis of cognitive alterations in alzheimer’s disease: synapse loss is the major correlate of cognitive impairment. Ann Neurol 30:572–580. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.410300410 source
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationOther binding partners that have been suggested to bind Aβ include the α7-nicotinic receptor, Ephrin A4 (EphA4), PSD95 or LilrB2.
“Other binding partners that have been suggested to bind Aβ include the α7-nicotinic receptor [49], Ephrin A4 (EphA4) [73], PSD95 [35, 50, 52] or LilrB2 [32].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [49] Parri HR, Hernandez CM, Dineley KT (2011) Research update: Alpha7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor mechanisms in Alzheimer’s disease. Biochem Pharmacol 82:931–942. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcp.2011.06.039 source
- cites [73] Vargas LM, Leal N, Estrada LD, González A, Serrano F, Araya K et al (2014) EphA4 activation of c-Abl mediates synaptic loss and LTP blockade caused by amyloid-β oligomers. PLoS ONE 9:e92309. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0092309 source
- cites [35] Lacor PN, Buniel MC, Chang L, Fernandez SJ, Gong Y, Viola KL et al (2004) Synaptic targeting by Alzheimer’s-related amyloid beta oligomers. J Neurosci 24:10191–10200. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3432-04.2004 source
It may state two separate claims as one.
Interpretationown dataIn mouse and human iPSC models, Aβ is in close proximity to TMEM97 in synapses and CT1812 treatment to disrupt this interaction is beneficial.
“Further we confirm in mouse and human iPSC models that Aβ is in close proximity to TMEM97 in synapses and that CT1812 treatment to disrupt this interaction is beneficial.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Study design and conductnone givenEach experiment was repeated with three different differentiations of each of the three lines.
“Each experiment was repeated with three different differentiations of each of the three lines.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Study design and conductown dataPost-mortem interval (PMI) was slightly longer in the Alzheimer's group (Welch's t test, t = − 2.36, p = 0.030).
“Post-mortem interval (PMI) was slightly longer in Alzheimer’s group (Welch’s t test, t = − 2.36, p = 0.030).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductreasoningOnly those objects detected in more than one consecutive section (3D objects) were quantified, allowing us to reduce non-specific signals.
“Importantly, only those objects detected in more than one consecutive Sect. (3D objects) were quantified, allowing us to reduce non-specific signals.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Study design and conductnone givenBias was minimized by setting the same parameters for image acquisition and image analysis for all the included cases.
“Bias was also minimized by setting the same parameters for image acquisition and image analysis for all the included cases.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationIn AD cases, images were acquired with a plaque in the field since our previous work demonstrated that synaptic Aβ accumulation is most prominent around plaques.
“In AD cases, images were acquired with a plaque in the field since our previous work demonstrated that synaptic Aβ accumulation is most prominent around plaques [29, 34].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [29] Jackson RJ, Rose J, Tulloch J, Henstridge C, Smith C, Spires-Jones TL (2019) Clusterin accumulates in synapses in Alzheimer’s disease and is increased in apolipoprotein E4 carriers. Brain Commun 1:fcz003. https://doi.org/10.1093/braincomms/fcz003 source
- cites [34] Koffie RM, Hashimoto T, Tai H-C, Kay KR, Serrano-Pozo A, Joyner D et al (2012) Apolipoprotein E4 effects in Alzheimer’s disease are mediated by synaptotoxic oligomeric amyloid-β. Brain 135:2155–2168. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/aws127 source
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Study design and conductown dataA post-hoc power calculation using the results from the primary question in this study-whether Aβ and TMEM97 generate a FRET signal in human synapses-indicates that with our n and effect size, we have 100% power to detect a positive FRET signal.
“A post-hoc power calculation using the results from the primary question in this study—whether Aβ and TMEM97 generate a FRET signal in human synapses—indicates that with our n and effect size, we have 100% power to detect a positive FRET signal (effect size 3.8 based on the % Aβ-TMEM97 FRET positive pixels within PSDs 38.4% ± 9.66 and the biological negative control—the % PSD-synaptophysin FRET”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Study design and conductnone givenThe precise binding location of CT1812 has not been directly determined.
“the precise binding location of CT1812 has not been directly determined”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
PremisecitationA previously published model proposes that CT1812 does not compete directly with oligomers at the same site.
“Therefore suggesting that CT1812 does not compete directly with oligomers at the same site [28]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [28] Izzo NJ, Yuede CM, LaBarbera KM, Limegrover CS, Rehak C, Yurko R et al (2021) Preclinical and clinical biomarker studies of CT1812: A novel approach to Alzheimer’s disease modification. Alzheimers Dement 17:1365–1382. https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.12302 source
Probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductown dataWe cannot rule out that Aβ may be binding to other nearby proteins instead of directly interacting with TMEM97.
“we cannot rule out that Aβ may be binding to other nearby proteins instead of directly interacting with TMEM97”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Interpretationnone givenThis interaction can be modulated by drugs.
“which is important as this interaction can be modulated by drugs”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationTMEM97 is thought to be an endo-lysosome-related protein linked to cellular toxicity and essential for the internalization of cholesterol molecules like LDL through the formation of a complex with PGRMC1.
“TMEM97 is thought to be an endo-lysosome-related protein which has itself been linked to cellular toxicity and is essential for the internalization of cholesterol molecules like LDL through the formation of a complex with PGRMC1 [4, 55]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [4] Bartz F, Kern L, Erz D, Zhu M, Gilbert D, Meinhof T et al (2009) Identification of cholesterol-regulating genes by targeted RNAi screening. Cell Metab 10:63–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2009.05.009 source
- cites [55] Riad A, Zeng C, Weng C-C, Winters H, Xu K, Makvandi M et al (2018) Sigma-2 receptor/TMEM97 and PGRMC-1 increase the rate of internalization of LDL by LDL receptor through the formation of a ternary complex. Sci Rep 8:16845. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-35430-3 source
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationCHI3L1 encodes YKL-40 protein, is expressed in astrocytes, and is a biomarker of inflammation in Alzheimer's disease.
“CHI3L1, which encodes YKL-40 protein, is expressed in astrocytes and is a biomarker of inflammation in Alzheimer’s disease [48]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [48] Olsson B, Lautner R, Andreasson U, Öhrfelt A, Portelius E, Bjerke M et al (2016) CSF and blood biomarkers for the diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Neurol 15:673–684. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(16)00070-3 source
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
PremisecitationIn tumor cells, the canonical Sigma-2 ligand DTG binds to Sigma-2 receptors at a location on the TMEM97 protein.
“In tumor cells, the canonical Sigma-2 ligand DTG binds to Sigma-2 receptors at a location on the TMEM97 protein [3]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [3] Alon A, Schmidt HR, Wood MD, Sahn JJ, Martin SF, Kruse AC (2017) Identification of the gene that codes for the σ2 receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 114:7160–7165. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1705154114 source
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Study design and conductnone givenWe only had capacity to image 1-2 cell lines per group in the 24 h condition.
“we only had capacity to image 1–2 cell lines per group (albeit with hundreds of imaged objects) in the 24 h condition”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationPCDHGB4 is a cell adhesion molecule on neuronal synapses involved in synaptic maturation and stabilization.
“a cell adhesion molecule on neuronal synapses, which is involved in synaptic maturation and stabilization [36]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [36] LaMassa N, Sverdlov H, Mambetalieva A, Shapiro S, Bucaro M, Fernandez-Monreal M et al (2021) Gamma-protocadherin localization at the synapse is associated with parameters of synaptic maturation. J Comp Neurol 529:2407–2417. https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.25102 source
The paper relies on this without support.
No direct interrogation has been done of whether TMEM97, PGRMC1 and Aβ are found within the same synapses in human brain, whether CT1812 affects TMEM97 binding to Aβ within synapses, or whether PrPC binding to TMEM97 may underlie the ability of Sigma-2 receptor modulators to displace Aβ oligomers.
“To date, there has been no direct interrogation of whether TMEM97, PGRMC1 and Aβ are found within the same synapses in human brain, whether CT1812 affects TMEM97 binding to Aβ within synapses, or whether PrPC binding to TMEM97 may underlie the ability of Sigma-2 receptor modulators to displace Aβ oligomers.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Pre-incubating iPSC-derived neurons with Aβ+ homogenate for 24 h before CT1812 treatment models the human treatment condition in which people have Aβ accumulation before treatment with CT1812 begins.
“Cells were pre-incubated with Aβ + homogenate for 24 h before CT1812 treatment to model the human treatment condition in which people have Aβ accumulation before treatment with CT1812 begins.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The relationship between Aβ and TMEM97 in human synapses was not previously clear.
“However, the relationship between Aβ and TMEM97 in human synapses was not previously clear.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The mechanisms by which Aβ induces synaptic toxicity remain unclear.
“It has been shown that Aβ can be found in synapses of Alzheimer’s cases [6, 29, 34, 51, 65, 66], but the mechanisms by which Aβ induces synaptic toxicity remain unclear.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Oligomers of Aβ at physiological concentrations in human brain cause synaptic damage and not neuron death directly.
“Both cell counts and TUNEL assay showed that the brain homogenate treatments were not cytotoxic compared to media (Fig. 5B, C), which is important as we wish to model synaptic damage, not neuron death, since oligomers of Aβ at physiological concentrations in human brain are thought to cause synaptic damage and not to induce neuron death directly.”
The paper relies on this without support.
There will be synaptic protein in cell bodies of neurons where they are produced before transport to synapses.
“There will be synaptic protein in cell bodies of neurons where they are produced before transport to synapses; however, with our technique, we do not observe somatic labelling of PSD95, rather we observe discrete puncta that are opposed to presynaptic terminal labelling [12].”
The authors state this as an assumption.
TMEM97 and PrPc interact.
“Given that TMEM97 and PrPc and PrPc and Aβ interact”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Prior exploratory CSF analyses supported an impact of zervimesine on AD pathophysiology including amyloid biology, synaptic function, inflammation and lipoprotein-related biological processes.
“These exploratory analyses supported an impact of zervimesine on AD pathophysiology [1, 36, 39, 40] including amyloid biology, synaptic function [4–6], inflammation and lipoprotein-related biological processes [5, 6, 41]”
From Impact of zervimesine on the neuroinflammatory biomarker GFAP and related proteomic molecular correlates in plasma of participants from a phase 2 clinical trial in Alzheimer’s disease (2026) · cites this paper as [36]
The Results section (page unavailable) reports that CT1812 altered pathways important for synaptic function in human iPSC-derived neurons, supporting the synaptic-function portion cited to this paper. The paper does not report exploratory CSF analyses, so it cannot substantiate the claim that those analyses showed this effect. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe oligomer receptor prion protein, PrPC, binds TMEM97 (S2R) and amyloid precursor protein (APP).
“the oligomer receptor prion protein, PrPC, not only binds TMEM97 (S2R) [36], it is also known to bind amyloid precursor protein (APP) [37]”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
RNA collection is placed at both approximately day 200 and day 180
MinorThe methods place the neuronal treatments and subsequent RNA harvest at approximately day 200 post-induction, while the discussion identifies day 180 as the time RNA was collected for sequencing.
“Neurons from three iPSC donors were grown to approximately day 200 post-induction in 24 well plates. Cells were treated with media, Aβ + homogenate, or Aβ− homogenate diluted 1:4 in media for 24 h followed by addition of CT1812 (10 mM) or DMSO (Merck, D2438-50ML) vehicle treatment for a further 24 h.”
“our iPSC-derived neurons are active at 180 days post-differentiation—the time point when RNA was also collected for sequencing”
Citations
Cites
Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2
Love, M. I., Huber, W., & Anders, S. (2014) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8 · Cited by 95,106
Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis
Schindelin, J., Arganda-Carreras, I., Frise, E., Kaynig, V., Longair, M., Pietzsch, T., Preibisch, S., Rueden, C., Saalfeld, S., Schmid, B., et al. (2012) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.2019 · Cited by 66,890
NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis
Schneider, C. A., Rasband, W. S., & Eliceiri, K. W. (2012) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.2089 · Cited by 64,638
STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner
Dobin, A., Davis, C. A., Schlesinger, F., Drenkow, J., Zaleski, C., Jha, S., Batut, P., Chaisson, M., & Gingeras, T. R. (2013) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bts635 · Cited by 51,709
featureCounts: an efficient general purpose program for assigning sequence reads to genomic features
Liao, Y., Smyth, G. K., & Shi, W. (2014) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btt656 · Cited by 27,219
Szklarczyk, D., Gable, A. L., Lyon, D., Junge, A., Wyder, S., Huerta-Cepas, J., Simonovic, M., Doncheva, N. T., Morris, J. H., Bork, P., et al. (2019) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gky1131 · Cited by 17,749
Terry, R. D., Masliah, E., Salmon, D. P., Butters, N., DeTeresa, R., Hill, R., Hansen, L. A., & Katzman, R. (1991) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.410300410 · Cited by 4,397
Shankar, G. M., Li, S., Mehta, T. H., Garcia-Munoz, A., Shepardson, N. E., Smith, I., Brett, F. M., Farrell, M. A., Rowan, M. J., Lemere, C. A., et al. (2008) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm1782 · Cited by 3,685
Phases of Aβ-deposition in the human brain and its relevance for the development of AD
Thal, D. R., Rüb, U., Orantes, M., & Braak, H. (2002) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.58.12.1791 · Cited by 3,490
Braak, H., Alafuzoff, I., Arzberger, T., Kretzschmar, H., & Del Tredici, K. (2006) · Acta Neuropathologica · doi:10.1007/s00401-006-0127-z · Cited by 3,172
Hyman, B. T., Phelps, C. H., Beach, T. G., Bigio, E. H., Cairns, N. J., Carrillo, M. C., Dickson, D. W., Duyckaerts, C., Frosch, M. P., Masliah, E., et al. (2012) · Alzheimer's & Dementia · doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2011.10.007 · Cited by 3,092
Montine, T. J., Phelps, C. H., Beach, T. G., Bigio, E. H., Cairns, N. J., Dickson, D. W., Duyckaerts, C., Frosch, M. P., Masliah, E., Mirra, S. S., et al. (2012) · Acta Neuropathologica · doi:10.1007/s00401-011-0910-3 · Cited by 2,894
Synapse loss in frontal cortex biopsies in Alzheimer's disease: Correlation with cognitive severity
DeKosky, S. T., & Scheff, S. W. (1990) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.410270502 · Cited by 2,376
Olsson, B., Lautner, R., Andreasson, U., Öhrfelt, A., Portelius, E., Bjerke, M., Hölttä, M., Rosén, C., Olsson, C., Strobel, G., et al. (2016) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(16)00070-3 · Cited by 2,049
Cellular prion protein mediates impairment of synaptic plasticity by amyloid-β oligomers
Laurén, J., Gimbel, D. A., Nygaard, H. B., Gilbert, J. W., & Strittmatter, S. M. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07761 · Cited by 1,560
Soluble Amyloid β Peptide Concentration as a Predictor of Synaptic Change in Alzheimer's Disease
Lue, L.-F., Kuo, Y.-M., Roher, A. E., Brachova, L., Shen, Y., Sue, L., Beach, T., Kurth, J. H., Rydel, R. E., & Rogers, J. (1999) · The American Journal of Pathology · doi:10.1016/s0002-9440(10)65184-x · Cited by 1,530
The Intersection of Amyloid Beta and Tau at Synapses in Alzheimer’s Disease
Spires-Jones, T. L., & Hyman, B. T. (2014) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2014.05.004 · Cited by 1,201
Self-citationHippocampal synaptic loss in early Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment
Scheff, S. W., Price, D. A., Schmitt, F. A., & Mufson, E. J. (2006) · Neurobiology of Aging · doi:10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2005.09.012 · Cited by 1,017
Shi, Y., Kirwan, P., & Livesey, F. J. (2012) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/nprot.2012.116 · Cited by 972
Synaptic Targeting by Alzheimer's-Related Amyloid β Oligomers
Lacor, P. N., Buniel, M. C., Chang, L., Fernandez, S. J., Gong, Y., Viola, K. L., Lambert, M. P., Velasco, P. T., Bigio, E. H., Finch, C. E., et al. (2004) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.3432-04.2004 · Cited by 954
Cavanaugh, J. E., & Neath, A. A. (2019) · WIREs Computational Statistics · doi:10.1002/wics.1460 · Cited by 910
Micheva, K. D., & Smith, S. J. (2007) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2007.06.014 · Cited by 787
Takahashi, R. H., Milner, T. A., Li, F., Nam, E. E., Edgar, M. A., Yamaguchi, H., Beal, M. F., Xu, H., Greengard, P., & Gouras, G. K. (2002) · The American Journal of Pathology · doi:10.1016/s0002-9440(10)64463-x · Cited by 706
Um, J. W., Kaufman, A. C., Kostylev, M., Heiss, J. K., Stagi, M., Takahashi, H., Kerrisk, M. E., Vortmeyer, A., Wisniewski, T., Koleske, A. J., et al. (2013) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2013.06.036 · Cited by 572
Precision and accuracy of single-molecule FRET measurements—a multi-laboratory benchmark study
Hellenkamp, B., Schmid, S., Doroshenko, O., Opanasyuk, O., Kühnemuth, R., Rezaei Adariani, S., Ambrose, B., Aznauryan, M., Barth, A., Birkedal, V., et al. (2018) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-018-0085-0 · Cited by 519
Synaptic degeneration in Alzheimer disease
Tzioras, M., McGeachan, R. I., Durrant, C. S., & Spires-Jones, T. L. (2023) · Nature Reviews Neurology · doi:10.1038/s41582-022-00749-z · Cited by 504
Self-citationOligomerization of Alzheimer's β-Amyloid within Processes and Synapses of Cultured Neurons and Brain
Takahashi, R. H., Almeida, C. G., Kearney, P. F., Yu, F., Lin, M. T., Milner, T. A., & Gouras, G. K. (2004) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.5167-03.2004 · Cited by 445
Synaptic Impairment in Alzheimer’s Disease: A Dysregulated Symphony
Forner, S., Baglietto-Vargas, D., Martini, A. C., Trujillo-Estrada, L., & LaFerla, F. M. (2017) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/j.tins.2017.04.002 · Cited by 430
Kim, T., Vidal, G. S., Djurisic, M., William, C. M., Birnbaum, M. E., Garcia, K. C., Hyman, B. T., & Shatz, C. J. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1242077 · Cited by 410
Imaging biochemistry inside cells
Wouters, F. S., Verveer, P. J., & Bastiaens, P. I. H. (2001) · Trends in Cell Biology · doi:10.1016/s0962-8924(01)01982-1 · Cited by 395
Beyond the neuron–cellular interactions early in Alzheimer disease pathogenesis
Henstridge, C. M., Hyman, B. T., & Spires-Jones, T. L. (2019) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41583-018-0113-1 · Cited by 348
Self-citationThe clinical promise of biomarkers of synapse damage or loss in Alzheimer’s disease
the Synaptic Health Endpoints Working Group, Colom-Cadena, M., Spires-Jones, T., Zetterberg, H., Blennow, K., Caggiano, A., DeKosky, S. T., Fillit, H., Harrison, J. E., Schneider, L. S., et al. (2020) · Alzheimer's Research & Therapy · doi:10.1186/s13195-020-00588-4 · Cited by 328
Self-citationApolipoprotein E4 effects in Alzheimer’s disease are mediated by synaptotoxic oligomeric amyloid-β
Koffie, R. M., Hashimoto, T., Tai, H.-C., Kay, K. R., Serrano-Pozo, A., Joyner, D., Hou, S., Kopeikina, K. J., Frosch, M. P., Lee, V. M., et al. (2012) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/aws127 · Cited by 327
Self-citationIdentification of the gene that codes for the σ 2 receptor
Alon, A., Schmidt, H. R., Wood, M. D., Sahn, J. J., Martin, S. F., & Kruse, A. C. (2017) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1705154114 · Cited by 267
Li, S., & Selkoe, D. J. (2020) · Journal of Neurochemistry · doi:10.1111/jnc.15007 · Cited by 263
Synaptic dysfunction in Alzheimer's disease: Mechanisms and therapeutic strategies
Chen, Y., Fu, A. K. Y., & Ip, N. Y. (2019) · Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1016/j.pharmthera.2018.11.006 · Cited by 258
Amyloid-β Receptors: The Good, the Bad, and the Prion Protein
Jarosz-Griffiths, H. H., Noble, E., Rushworth, J. V., & Hooper, N. M. (2016) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.r115.702704 · Cited by 256
Colom-Cadena, M., Davies, C., Sirisi, S., Lee, J.-E., Simzer, E. M., Tzioras, M., Querol-Vilaseca, M., Sánchez-Aced, É., Chang, Y. Y., Holt, K., et al. (2023) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2023.04.020 · Cited by 224
Self-citationPham, E., Crews, L., Ubhi, K., Hansen, L., Adame, A., Cartier, A., Salmon, D., Galasko, D., Michael, S., Savas, J. N., et al. (2010) · The FEBS Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1742-4658.2010.07719.x · Cited by 206
Identification of Cholesterol-Regulating Genes by Targeted RNAi Screening
Bartz, F., Kern, L., Erz, D., Zhu, M., Gilbert, D., Meinhof, T., Wirkner, U., Erfle, H., Muckenthaler, M., Pepperkok, R., et al. (2009) · Cell Metabolism · doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2009.05.009 · Cited by 198
Research update: Alpha7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor mechanisms in Alzheimer's disease
Parri, H. R., Hernandez, C. M., & Dineley, K. T. (2011) · Biochemical Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.bcp.2011.06.039 · Cited by 187
Izzo, N. J., Staniszewski, A., To, L., Fa, M., Teich, A. F., Saeed, F., Wostein, H., Walko, T., Vaswani, A., Wardius, M., et al. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0111898 · Cited by 180
Self-citationPickett, E. K., Herrmann, A. G., McQueen, J., Abt, K., Dando, O., Tulloch, J., Jain, P., Dunnett, S., Sohrabi, S., Fjeldstad, M. P., et al. (2019) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2019.11.044 · Cited by 179
Self-citationThe Molecular Function of σ Receptors: Past, Present, and Future
Schmidt, H. R., & Kruse, A. C. (2019) · Trends in Pharmacological Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tips.2019.07.006 · Cited by 177
A second X chromosome contributes to resilience in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease
Davis, E. J., Broestl, L., Abdulai-Saiku, S., Worden, K., Bonham, L. W., Miñones-Moyano, E., Moreno, A. J., Wang, D., Chang, K., Williams, G., et al. (2020) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.aaz5677 · Cited by 176
Hong, W., Wang, Z., Liu, W., O’Malley, T. T., Jin, M., Willem, M., Haass, C., Frosch, M. P., & Walsh, D. M. (2018) · Acta Neuropathologica · doi:10.1007/s00401-018-1846-7 · Cited by 163
Identification and characterization of genes differentially expressed in meningiomas.
Murphy, M. E., Pykett, M. J., Harnish, P. R., Zang, K. D., & George, D. L. (1993) · PubMed · Cited by 160
Izzo, N. J., Xu, J., Zeng, C., Kirk, M. J., Mozzoni, K., Silky, C., Rehak, C., Yurko, R., Look, G., Rishton, G., et al. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0111899 · Cited by 157
Self-citationRiad, A., Zeng, C., Weng, C.-C., Winters, H., Xu, K., Makvandi, M., Metz, T., Carlin, S., & Mach, R. H. (2018) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-35430-3 · Cited by 147
Synaptic phosphorylated α-synuclein in dementia with Lewy bodies
Colom‐Cadena, M., Pegueroles, J., Herrmann, A. G., Henstridge, C. M., Muñoz, L., Querol‐Vilaseca, M., Martín-Paniello, C. S., Luque-Cabecerans, J., Clarimón, J., Belbin, O., et al. (2017) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awx275 · Cited by 127
Self-citationStudying synapses in human brain with array tomography and electron microscopy
Kay, K. R., Smith, C., Wright, A. K., Serrano-Pozo, A., Pooler, A. M., Koffie, R., Bastin, M. E., Bak, T. H., Abrahams, S., Kopeikina, K. J., et al. (2013) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/nprot.2013.078 · Cited by 116
Self-citationYi, B., Sahn, J. J., Ardestani, P. M., Evans, A. K., Scott, L. L., Chan, J. Z., Iyer, S., Crisp, A., Zuniga, G., Pierce, J. T., et al. (2017) · Journal of Neurochemistry · doi:10.1111/jnc.13917 · Cited by 116
Synaptic Amyloid-β Oligomers Precede p-Tau and Differentiate High Pathology Control Cases
Bilousova, T., Miller, C. A., Poon, W. W., Vinters, H. V., Corrada, M., Kawas, C., Hayden, E. Y., Teplow, D. B., Glabe, C., Albay, R., et al. (2016) · The American Journal of Pathology · doi:10.1016/j.ajpath.2015.09.018 · Cited by 115
Tzioras, M., Daniels, M. J. D., Davies, C., Baxter, P. S., King, D., McKay, S., Varga, B. V., Popovic, K., Hernandez, M., Stevenson, A. J., et al. (2023) · Cell Reports Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.xcrm.2023.101175 · Cited by 114
Self-citationVilner, B. J., & Bowen, W. D. (2000) · The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics · doi:10.1016/s0022-3565(24)35369-8 · Cited by 112
Binding Sites for Amyloid-β Oligomers and Synaptic Toxicity
Smith, L. M., & Strittmatter, S. M. (2017) · Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Medicine · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a024075 · Cited by 109
Hesse, R., Hurtado, M. L., Jackson, R. J., Eaton, S. L., Herrmann, A. G., Colom-Cadena, M., Tzioras, M., King, D., Rose, J., Tulloch, J., et al. (2019) · Acta Neuropathologica Communications · doi:10.1186/s40478-019-0847-7 · Cited by 107
Self-citationCellular Receptors of Amyloid β Oligomers (AβOs) in Alzheimer’s Disease
Mroczko, B., Groblewska, M., Litman-Zawadzka, A., Kornhuber, J., & Lewczuk, P. (2018) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms19071884 · Cited by 97
Grundman, M., Morgan, R., Lickliter, J. D., Schneider, L. S., DeKosky, S., Izzo, N. J., Guttendorf, R., Higgin, M., Pribyl, J., Mozzoni, K., et al. (2019) · Alzheimer's & Dementia: Translational Research & Clinical Interventions · doi:10.1016/j.trci.2018.11.001 · Cited by 96
Self-citationIzzo, N. J., Yuede, C. M., LaBarbera, K. M., Limegrover, C. S., Rehak, C., Yurko, R., Waybright, L., Look, G., Rishton, G., Safferstein, H., et al. (2021) · Alzheimer's & Dementia · doi:10.1002/alz.12302 · Cited by 95
Self-citationNon-Fibrillar Oligomeric Amyloid-β within Synapses
Pickett, E. K., Koffie, R. M., Wegmann, S., Henstridge, C. M., Herrmann, A. G., Colom-Cadena, M., Lleo, A., Kay, K. R., Vaught, M., Soberman, R., et al. (2016) · Journal of Alzheimer's Disease · doi:10.3233/jad-160007 · Cited by 90
Self-citationFörster, T. (1967) · Comprehensive biochemistry · doi:10.1016/b978-1-4831-9712-8.50010-2 · Cited by 88
EphA4 Activation of c-Abl Mediates Synaptic Loss and LTP Blockade Caused by Amyloid-β Oligomers
M. Vargas, L., Leal, N., Estrada, L. D., González, A., Serrano, F., Araya, K., Gysling, K., Inestrosa, N. C., Pasquale, E. B., & Alvarez, A. R. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0092309 · Cited by 85
Riad, A., Lengyel-Zhand, Z., Zeng, C., Weng, C.-C., Lee, V. M.-Y., Trojanowski, J. Q., & Mach, R. H. (2020) · Molecular Neurobiology · doi:10.1007/s12035-020-01988-1 · Cited by 81
Abd‐Elrahman, K. S., Albaker, A. B., de Souza, J. M., Ribeiro, F. M., Schlossmacher, M. G., Tiberi, M., Hamilton, A., & Ferguson, S. S. G. (2020) · Science Signaling · doi:10.1126/scisignal.abd2494 · Cited by 79
Smith, L. M., Kostylev, M. A., Lee, S., & Strittmatter, S. M. (2019) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.ra118.006252 · Cited by 73
Jackson, R. J., Rose, J., Tulloch, J., Henstridge, C., Smith, C., & Spires-Jones, T. L. (2019) · Brain Communications · doi:10.1093/braincomms/fcz003 · Cited by 69
Self-citationPromiscuous Alzheimer's Amyloid: Yet Another Partner
Benilova, I., & De Strooper, B. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1244166 · Cited by 67
Sigma-2 Receptor Ligands: Neurobiological Effects
Guo, L., & Zhen, X. (2015) · Current Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.2174/0929867322666150114163607 · Cited by 66
Proportion of Women and Reporting of Outcomes by Sex in Clinical Trials for Alzheimer Disease
Martínková, J., Quevenco, F., Karcher, H., Ferrari, A., Sandset, E. C., Szoeke, C. E. I., Hort, J., Schmidt, R., Chadha, A. S., & Ferretti, M. T. (2021) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.24124 · Cited by 64
The whole transcriptome and proteome changes in the early stage of myocardial infarction
Li, Y., Wang, C., Li, T., Ma, L., Fan, F., Jin, Y., & Shen, J. (2019) · Cell Death Discovery · doi:10.1038/s41420-019-0152-z · Cited by 58
Zhang, Y., Zhao, Y., Zhang, L., Yu, W., Wang, Y., & Chang, W. (2019) · Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fncel.2019.00339 · Cited by 58
Cassano, G., Gasparre, G., Niso, M., Contino, M., Scalera, V., & Colabufo, N. A. (2009) · Cell Calcium · doi:10.1016/j.ceca.2008.12.005 · Cited by 51
TMEM97 and PGRMC1 do not mediate sigma-2 ligand-induced cell death
Zeng, C., Weng, C.-C., Schneider, M. E., Puentes, L., Riad, A., Xu, K., Makvandi, M., Jin, L., Hawkins, W. G., & Mach, R. H. (2019) · Cell Death Discovery · doi:10.1038/s41420-019-0141-2 · Cited by 48
Agostini, A., Ding, Y., Bai, L., Kendall, D. A., & Pardon, M. (2019) · Brain Behavior and Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.bbi.2019.09.019 · Cited by 43
Mondal, S., Hegarty, E., Sahn, J. J., Scott, L. L., Gökçe, S. K., Martin, C., Ghorashian, N., Satarasinghe, P. N., Iyer, S., Sae-Lee, W., et al. (2018) · ACS Chemical Neuroscience · doi:10.1021/acschemneuro.7b00428 · Cited by 41
Synaptic resilience is associated with maintained cognition during ageing
King, D., Holt, K., Toombs, J., He, X., Dando, O., Okely, J. A., Tzioras, M., Rose, J. L., Gunn, C., Correia, A., et al. (2022) · Alzheimer s & Dementia · doi:10.1002/alz.12894 · Cited by 34
Self-citationAnti‐PrPC antibody rescues cognition and synapses in transgenic alzheimer mice
Cox, T. O., Gunther, E. C., Brody, A. H., Chiasseu, M. T., Stoner, A., Smith, L. M., Haas, L. T., Hammersley, J., Rees, G., Dosanjh, B., et al. (2019) · Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology · doi:10.1002/acn3.730 · Cited by 33
Toombs, J., Panther, L., Ornelas, L., Liu, C., Gomez, E., Martín‐Ibáñez, R., Cox, S. R., Ritchie, S. J., Harris, S. E., Taylor, A. M., et al. (2020) · Stem Cell Research · doi:10.1016/j.scr.2020.101851 · Cited by 18
Self-citationYeap, J., Sathyaprakash, C., Toombs, J., Tulloch, J., Scutariu, C., Rose, J. L., Burr, K., Davies, C., Colom‐Cadena, M., Chandran, S., et al. (2022) · Brain and Neuroscience Advances · doi:10.1177/23982128221086464 · Cited by 16
Self-citationGamma‐protocadherin localization at the synapse is associated with parameters of synaptic maturation
LaMassa, N., Sverdlov, H., Mambetalieva, A., Shapiro, S., Bucaro, M., Fernandez‐Monreal, M., & Phillips, G. R. (2021) · Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/cne.25102 · Cited by 13
Zimmermann, T. (2019) · Methods in Molecular Biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-9686-5_12 · Cited by 5
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Updates in Alzheimer's disease: from basic research to diagnosis and therapies
Liu, E., Zhang, Y., & Wang, J. (2024) · Translational Neurodegeneration · doi:10.1186/s40035-024-00432-x · Cited by 230
Colom-Cadena, M., Davies, C., Sirisi, S., Lee, J.-E., Simzer, E. M., Tzioras, M., Querol-Vilaseca, M., Sánchez-Aced, É., Chang, Y. Y., Holt, K., et al. (2023) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2023.04.020 · Cited by 224
Self-citationAmyloid-β and Tau in Alzheimer’s disease: pathogenesis, mechanisms, and interplay
Abdulkhaliq, A. A., Kim, B., Almoghrabi, Y. M., Khan, J., Ajoolabady, A., Ren, J., Bahijri, S., Tuomilehto, J., Borai, A., & Pratico, D. (2026) · Cell Death & Disease · doi:10.1038/s41419-025-08186-8 · Cited by 87
Lizama, B. N., Kahle, J., Catalano, S. M., Caggiano, A. O., Grundman, M., & Hamby, M. E. (2023) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms24076251 · Cited by 54
Self-citationArnsten, A. F. T., Tredici, K. D., Barthélemy, N. R., Gabitto, M. I., van Dyck, C. H., Lein, E. S., Braak, H., & Datta, D. (2025) · Alzheimer s & Dementia · doi:10.1002/alz.70404 · Cited by 39
The Sigma Receptors in Alzheimer’s Disease: New Potential Targets for Diagnosis and Therapy
Wang, T., & Jia, H. (2023) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms241512025 · Cited by 29
Synapse vulnerability and resilience across the clinical spectrum of dementias
Taddei, R. N., & Duff, K. (2025) · Nature Reviews Neurology · doi:10.1038/s41582-025-01094-7 · Cited by 26
Lizama, B. N., North, H. A., Pandey, K., Williams, C., Duong, D., Cho, E., Di Caro, V., Ping, L., Blennow, K., Zetterberg, H., et al. (2024) · Neurobiology of Disease · doi:10.1016/j.nbd.2024.106575 · Cited by 19
Self-citationEhrenberg, A. J., Sant, C., Pereira, F. L., Li, S. H., Buxton, J., Langlois, S., Trinidad, M. I., Oh, I. M., Leite, R. E. P., Rodriguez, R. D., et al. (2025) · Alzheimer s & Dementia · doi:10.1002/alz.70087 · Cited by 16
The evolving therapeutic landscape of dementia with Lewy bodies
Kaila, L. V., Ikeda, M., Sultana, J., Chouliaras, L., O'Brien, J. T., & Taylor, J. (2025) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(25)00323-0 · Cited by 14
Barbanente, A., Kopecka, J., Vitone, D., Niso, M., Rizzi, R., Cuocci, C., Abatematteo, F. S., Mastropasqua, F., Colabufo, N. A., Margiotta, N., et al. (2024) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.jmedchem.4c01410 · Cited by 11
Lizama, B. N., Keeling, E., Cho, E.-A., Malagise, E. M., Knezovich, N., Waybright, L., Watto, E., Look, G. C., Caro, V. D., Caggiano, A. O., et al. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-87921-9 · Cited by 11
Self-citationClinical Update on an Anti-Alzheimer Drug Candidate CT1812: A Sigma-2 Receptor Antagonist
Kaur, G., Dar, Z. A., Bajpai, A., Singh, R., & Bansal, R. (2024) · Clinical Therapeutics · doi:10.1016/j.clinthera.2024.08.013 · Cited by 9
McGeachan, R. I., Ewbank, L., Watt, M., Sordo, L., Malbon, A. J., Salamat, M. K. F., Tzioras, M., Frias, J. M. D., Tulloch, J., Houston, F. E., et al. (2025) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1111/ejn.70180 · Cited by 8
Self-citationFederated Learning for Clients’ Data Privacy Assurance in Food Service Industry
Gorji, H. T., Saeedi, M., Mushtaq, E., Zadeh, H. K., Husarik, K., Shahabi, S. M., Qin, J., Chan, D. E., Baek, I., Kim, M. S., et al. (2023) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app13169330 · Cited by 8
Lotlikar, M. S., Zellmer, J. C., & Bhattacharyya, R. (2025) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2025.1733659 · Cited by 7
Chiarini, A., Armato, U., Gui, L., Yin, M., Chang, S., & Prà, I. D. (2024) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2024.149283 · Cited by 7
Lizama, B. N., Williams, C., North, H. A., Pandey, K., Duong, D., Di Caro, V., Mecca, A. P., Blennow, K., Zetterberg, H., Levey, A. I., et al. (2024) · Alzheimer's & Dementia · doi:10.1002/alz.14152 · Cited by 8
Self-citationSteinfield, S. R., Stenn, D. F., Chen, H., & Kalisch, B. E. (2025) · Pharmaceuticals · doi:10.3390/ph18050659 · Cited by 7
A synaptic-astrocytic proteomic signature associated with synaptopathy in Alzheimer’s DiseasePreprint
Griffiths, J., Schneegans, E., Whitwell, H. J., Qiu, Z., Notman, B., Cheung, T. K. D., Willumsen, N., Matthews, P. M., Grant, S. G. N., & Jackson, J. (2025) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2025.01.23.634408 · Cited by 7
Analysis of Blood Gene Expression Data Toward Early Detection of Alzheimer’s DiseasePreprint
Gorji, H. T., Kardan, R., & Rezagholizadeh, N. (2021) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2021.07.26.21261147 · Cited by 6
Extracellular Vesicles in Alzheimer’s Disease: Mechanisms, Biomarkers, and Therapeutic Engineering
Wang, L., Mao, L., & Zong, X. (2026) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms27093974 · Cited by 4
Hong, V. M., Rade, A., Bhaskara, A., Ehsan, T., Tack, S. H., Yousuf, M. S., Martin, S. F., Price, T. J., & Kolber, B. J. (2025) · ACS Pharmacology & Translational Science · doi:10.1021/acsptsci.5c00157 · Cited by 3
Neuroprotective effect of Sigma-2 modulator CT2074 in a mouse model of ocular hypertension
Donkor, N., Kiehlbauch, C. C., Pappenhagen, N., Look, G. C., Morgan, A. B., Shin, R. S., Hamby, M. E., & Inman, D. M. (2024) · Experimental Eye Research · doi:10.1016/j.exer.2024.110143 · Cited by 2
Self-citationStathopoulos, A., Wang, J. J., Martin, S. F., & Zhang, S. X. (2025) · Biomolecules · doi:10.3390/biom15091228 · Cited by 2
Randomized, double-blind study of zervimesine in mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease
Vijverberg, E. G. B., Scharre, D. W., Woodward, M., Catalano, S., Hamby, M. E., Grundman, M., Morgan, R. E., Iaci, J., Devins, T., & Caggiano, A. O. (2026) · Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease · doi:10.1177/13872877261437145 · Cited by 2
Self-citationIsolation and Bioassay of Linear Veraguamides from a Marine Cyanobacterium (Okeania sp.)
Parker, S. J., Hough, A., Wright, T. D., Lax, N. C., Faruk, A., Fofié, C. K., Simcik, R. D., Cavanaugh, J. E., Kolber, B. J., & Tidgewell, K. J. (2025) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules30030680 · Cited by 2
Di Caro, V., Cho, E., North, H. A., Caldwell, J., Pandey, K., Duong, D., Grundman, M., de Haan, W., Vijverberg, E. G., Teunissen, C. E., et al. (2025) · Alzheimer's & Dementia: Translational Research & Clinical Interventions · doi:10.1002/trc2.70119 · Cited by 2
Self-citationDi Caro, V., Cho, E., Thiel, J., Lizama, B. N., Koel-Simmelink, M. J. A., Pandey, K., Duong, D., Seyfried, N. T., Grundman, M., Teunissen, C. E., et al. (2026) · Alzheimer's Research & Therapy · doi:10.1186/s13195-026-02025-4 · Cited by 1
Self-citationZervimesine, a Small Sigma-2 Receptor Selective Modulator for Alzheimer’s Disease
Iriepa, I., Contino, M., Abate, C., & Marco, J. L. (2025) · ACS Medicinal Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1021/acsmedchemlett.5c00653 · Cited by 1
Holt, K., Chang, Y. Y., Li, M., Albertini, G., Smith, C., Tulloch, J., Strooper, B. D., Hardingham, G. E., & Spires‐Jones, T. L. (2026) · medRxiv · doi:10.64898/2026.05.08.26352549 · Cited by 1
Self-citationMechanisms of Selective Vulnerability in Alzheimer’s Disease and Stress Disorders
Ehrenberg, A. J. (2024) · eScholarship (California Digital Library)
Elucidation of the role of sigma-2 receptors in the anticancer Activity of siramesine
Δημητρίου, Μ.-Χ. Ι., & Δημητρίου, Μ.-Χ. Ι. (2025) · University of Thessaly Institutional Repository (University of Thessaly)
Wu, T., Yan, M., Liu, Y., Huifang, W., Ma, C., Liu, X., Guo, Y., Zhang, H., Xu, Y., Xu, Y., et al. (2025) · Journal of Environmental Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.jes.2025.12.086
Lin, Z., Cai, L., Lin, J.-X., & Zheng, G.-Y. (2026) · Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine · doi:10.1007/s11655-025-3940-8
Gobbo, F., King, D., Tulloch, J., Gobbo, D., Bonthron, C., Meftah, S., Stoddart‐Campbelton, C., Tamura, A., Rose, J. L., Smith, C. M., et al. (2026) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1111/ejn.70480
Self-citationCrystal Structure of the Sigma-2 Receptor Complexed with Investigational Drug Zervimesine (CT1812)
Look, G. C., Gilzer, D., Preuß, F., Wollenhaupt, J., Nitsche, J., Amaudrut, J., Malancona, S., Montalbetti, C., Caggiano, A. O., & Hamby, M. E. (2026) · ACS Medicinal Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1021/acsmedchemlett.6c00215
Self-citationWang, Q., Wei, Y., Shen, C., Kang, W., & Wang, L. (2026) · Neurochemical Research · doi:10.1007/s11064-026-04864-x
Current treatments for dementias
Spires‐Jones, T. L. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780198995296.003.0006
Self-citationThe neuroscience of Alzheimer’s disease
Spires‐Jones, T. L. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780198995296.003.0003
Self-citationLi, B., Zhang, Z., Bao, H., Wang, Y., Ye, X., Haixia, T., & Fang, W. (2026) · Neuroreport · doi:10.1097/wnr.0000000000002300
Li, Y., Liao, Y., Zhang, S., Xu, C., Lan, R., Zhao, P., Liu, R., Song, Y., & Zhang, X. (2026) · Frontiers in Synaptic Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnsyn.2026.1923815
Synaptic tau pathology in Alzheimer's Disease
Sánchez‐Aced, É. (2026) · Tesis Doctorals en Xarxa (Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya)
Limitations of current neuroprotective therapies in dementia with Lewy bodies
O’Shea, D. M., Disla, S., Gosling, A. E., Valdelamar, G. A., Tolea, M. I., & Galvin, J. E. (2026) · Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology · doi:10.1080/17512433.2026.2742316
Metadata
- Authors
- Colom-Cadena, M., Toombs, J., Simzer, E., Holt, K., McGeachan, R., Tulloch, J., Jackson, R. J., Catterson, J. H., Spires-Jones, M. P., Rose, J., Waybright, L., Caggiano, A. O., King, D., Gobbo, F., Davies, C., Hooley, M., Dunnett, S., Tempelaar, R., Meftah, S., Tzioras, M., Hamby, M. E., Izzo, N. J., Catalano, S. M., Durrant, C. S., Smith, C., Dando, O., & Spires-Jones, T. L.
- Affiliations
- UK Dementia Research Institute (GB)
- Harvard University (US)
- Cognition Therapeutics (United States) (US)
- University of Edinburgh (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Spires-Jones, Maxwell P.
- ORCID
- Toombs, Jamie
- Simzer, Elizabeth
- McGeachan, Robert
- Tulloch, Jane
- Jackson, Rosemary J.
- Catterson, James H.
- Spires-Jones, Maxwell P.
- Rose, Jamie
- Caggiano, Anthony O.
- King, Declan
- Gobbo, Francesco
- Hooley, Monique
- Tzioras, Makis
- Hamby, Mary E.
- Izzo, Nicholas J.
- Catalano, Susan M.
- Durrant, Claire S.
- Smith, Colin
- Dando, Owen
- Spires-Jones, Tara L.
- Venue
- Acta Neuropathologica
- Published
- 2024-02-06
- Volume
- 147
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 32-32
- ISSN
- 0001-6322 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-0533
- PMC
- PMC10847197
- OpenAlex
- W4391575659
- Cited by
- 44
- References
- 82
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 8
- FWCI
- 5.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Acta Neuropathologica (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Discovery Research Portal (University of Dundee) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- UK Dementia Research Institute (UKDRI-Edin005)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
- Keywords
- amyloid-beta, Alzheimer's disease, synaptotoxicity, amyloid-beta oligomers, synaptic terminals, presynaptic terminals, postsynaptic density, cellular prion protein, PSD-95, allosteric modulators, iPSC-derived neurons, neuroinflammation, neurodegeneration, temporal cortex
- MeSH terms
- Alzheimer Disease, Animals, Brain, Humans, Membrane Proteins, Synapses, Amyloid beta-Peptides, Mice, Cognitive Dysfunction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-11-10, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-10 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review