The DOI matches its Crossref record; 58 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Frequent itemset mining: A 25 years review
Abstract
Frequent itemset mining (FIM) is an essential task within data analysis since it is responsible for extracting frequently occurring events, patterns, or items in data. Insights from such pattern analysis offer important benefits in decision‐making processes. However, algorithmic solutions for mining such kind of patterns are not straightforward since the computational complexity exponentially increases with the number of items in data. This issue, together with the significant memory consumption that is present in the mining process, makes it necessary to propose extremely efficient solutions. Since the FIM problem was first described in the early 1990s, multiple solutions have been proposed by considering centralized systems as well as parallel (shared or nonshared memory) architectures. Solutions can also be divided into exhaustive search and nonexhaustive search models. Many of such approaches are extensions of other solutions and it is therefore necessary to analyze how this task has been considered during the last decades. This article is categorized under: Algorithmic Development > Association Rules Technologies > Association Rules
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Data mining: concepts and techniques
(2012) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.49-3305 · Cited by 28,531
MapReduce: simplified data processing on large clusters
Dean, J., & Ghemawat, S. (2008) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/1327452.1327492 · Cited by 18,476
Mining association rules between sets of items in large databases
Agrawal, R., Imieliński, T., & Swami, A. (1993) · Proceedings of the 1993 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data · doi:10.1145/170035.170072 · Cited by 14,907
Fast Algorithms for Mining Association Rules in Large Databases
Agrawal, R., & Srikant, R. (1994) · Very Large Data Bases · Cited by 9,419
Mining frequent patterns without candidate generation
Han, J., Pei, J., & Yin, Y. (2000) · ACM SIGMOD Record · doi:10.1145/335191.335372 · Cited by 6,402
Data Mining: Concepts and Techniques
Thamaraiselvi, G., & Kaliammal, A. (2014) · Journal of Information and Knowledge · Cited by 4,088
Dynamic itemset counting and implication rules for market basket data
Brin, S., Motwani, R., Ullman, J. D., & Tsur, S. (1997) · Proceedings of the 1997 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data - SIGMOD '97 · doi:10.1145/253260.253325 · Cited by 1,951
Scalable algorithms for association mining
Zaki, M. J. (2000) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/69.846291 · Cited by 1,751
Mining generalized association rules
Srikant, R., & Agrawal, R. (1997) · Future Generation Computer Systems · doi:10.1016/s0167-739x(97)00019-8 · Cited by 1,618
An Efficient Algorithm for Mining Association Rules in Large Databases
Savasere, A., Omiecinski, E. R., & Navathe, S. B. (1995) · Cited by 1,590
Cited by
Data Organisation for Efficient Pattern Retrieval: Indexing, Storage, and Access Structures
Koukaras, P., & Tjortjis, C. (2025) · Big Data and Cognitive Computing · doi:10.3390/bdcc9100258 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Luna, J. M., Fournier‐Viger, P., & Ventura, S.
- Venue
- WIREs Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2019-07-16
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 6
- ISSN
- 1942-4787 (ISSN-L)
- 1942-4795
- OpenAlex
- W2961234535
- Cited by
- 258
- References
- 58
- FWCI
- 34.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Frequent itemset mining: A 25 years review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/widm.1329
- The paper
- Luna, J. M., Fournier‐Viger, P., & Ventura, S. (2019). Frequent itemset mining: A 25 years review. WIREs Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery. https://doi.org/10.1002/widm.1329
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.